Cover (topology)

In mathematics, particularly topology, a cover of a set is a collection of sets whose union includes as a subset. Formally, if is an indexed family of sets , then is a cover of if

Cover in topology

Covers are commonly used in the context of topology. If the set X is a topological space, then a cover C of X is a collection of subsets Uα of X whose union is the whole space X. In this case we say that C covers X, or that the sets Uα cover X. Also, if Y is a subset of X, then a cover of Y is a collection of subsets of X whose union contains Y, i.e., C is a cover of Y if

Let C be a cover of a topological space X. A subcover of C is a subset of C that still covers X.

We say that C is an open cover if each of its members is an open set (i.e. each Uα is contained in T, where T is the topology on X).

A cover of X is said to be locally finite if every point of X has a neighborhood that intersects only finitely many sets in the cover. Formally, C = {Uα} is locally finite if for any xX, there exists some neighborhood N(x) of x such that the set

is finite. A cover of X is said to be point finite if every point of X is contained in only finitely many sets in the cover. A cover is point finite if it is locally finite, though the converse is not necessarily true.

Refinement

A refinement of a cover C of a topological space X is a new cover D of X such that every set in D is contained in some set in C. Formally,

.

In other words, there is a refinement map satisfying for every . This map is used, for instance, in the Čech cohomology of X.[1]

Every subcover is also a refinement, but the opposite is not always true. A subcover is made from the sets that are in the cover, but omitting some of them; whereas a refinement is made from any sets that are subsets of the sets in the cover.

The refinement relation is a preorder on the set of covers of X.

Generally speaking, a refinement of a given structure is another that in some sense contains it. Examples are to be found when partitioning an interval (one refinement of being ), considering topologies (the standard topology in euclidean space being a refinement of the trivial topology). When subdividing simplicial complexes (the first barycentric subdivision of a simplicial complex is a refinement), the situation is slightly different: every simplex in the finer complex is a face of some simplex in the coarser one, and both have equal underlying polyhedra.

Yet another notion of refinement is that of star refinement.

Subcover

A simple way to get a subcover is to omit the sets contained in another set in the cover. Consider specifically open covers. Let be a topological basis of and be an open cover of . First take . Then is a refinement of . Next, for each , we select a containing (requiring the axiom of choice). Then is a subcover of . Hence the cardinality of a subcover of an open cover can be as small as that of any topological basis. Hence in particular second countability implies a space is Lindelöf.

Compactness

The language of covers is often used to define several topological properties related to compactness. A topological space X is said to be

Compact
if every open cover has a finite subcover, (or equivalently that every open cover has a finite refinement);
Lindelöf
if every open cover has a countable subcover, (or equivalently that every open cover has a countable refinement);
Metacompact
if every open cover has a point-finite open refinement;
Paracompact
if every open cover admits a locally finite open refinement.

For some more variations see the above articles.

Covering dimension

A topological space X is said to be of covering dimension n if every open cover of X has a point-finite open refinement such that no point of X is included in more than n+1 sets in the refinement and if n is the minimum value for which this is true.[2] If no such minimal n exists, the space is said to be of infinite covering dimension.

gollark: You can also do that.
gollark: You certainly can.
gollark: Sure, why not.
gollark: Defaults are the tyranny of the majority.
gollark: CC's amount of global state is very annoying.

See also

Notes

  1. Bott, Tu (1982). Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. p. 111.
  2. Munkres, James (1999). Topology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-181629-2.

References

  1. Introduction to Topology, Second Edition, Theodore W. Gamelin & Robert Everist Greene. Dover Publications 1999. ISBN 0-486-40680-6
  2. General Topology, John L. Kelley. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. Princeton, NJ. 1955.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.