Stewart Foo Fighter

The Stewart Foo Fighter JD2FF is a single-seat biplane homebuilt aircraft design that emulates fighter aircraft of World War I.[1]

Stewart Foo Fighter
Role Homebuilt aircraft
National origin United States
Manufacturer Stewart Aircraft Corporation
Designer Don Stewart
First flight 1967
Introduction 1970

Design and development

The Foo Fighter was developed using similar construction features as the Stewart Headwind. The fuselage is welded steel tubing with fabric covering. The lower wing design is unusual, passing below the fuselage rather than attaching to it on either side. The first aircraft built used a Ford Falcon 200 CID engine that proved to be too heavy. A Franklin 130 hp engine was used next, but the engine went out of production. The final design was changed to accommodate a Lycoming O-235 or O-320 engine.[2]

Operational history

The Foo Fighter was demonstrated for over 30 hours during the one-week Experimental Aircraft Association Convention in Oshkosh, Wisconsin In 1972.[3]

Specifications (Stewart Foo Fighter)

Data from http://www.stewartaircraft.com/main.html

General characteristics

  • Crew: one
  • Length: 18 ft 9 in (5.72 m)
  • Wingspan: 20 ft 8 in (6.30 m)
  • Height: 7 ft (2.1 m)
  • Empty weight: 720 lb (327 kg)
  • Gross weight: 1,100 lb (499 kg)
  • Fuel capacity: 19 U.S. gallons (72 L; 16 imp gal)
  • Powerplant: 1 × Lycoming O-235 piston aircraft engine

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 126 kn (145 mph, 233 km/h)
  • Cruise speed: 117 kn (135 mph, 217 km/h)
  • Stall speed: 45 kn (52 mph, 83 km/h)
  • Range: 300 nmi (345 mi, 555 km)
  • Rate of climb: 1,200 ft/min (6.1 m/s)
gollark: You have a reasonable point that you can be nice to people inside a conversation but (possibly inadvertently) non-nice to those outside it. I think niceness within conversations is more important, as people outside them can more easily choose not to participate in them, but this doesn't work excellently. Banning discussion of anything some people do not like reading is *a* fix for some of this, but I don't like the tradeoffs, given the wide range of things in this category. Isolating that elsewhere is also not good for various reasons I indicated before. A generalized rule-4-y approach could end up doing basically the same thing as preemptively banning it, and people seem dissatisfied with "ignore the channel for a bit". Thus, I'm unsure of how the issue can be solved nicely and it's worth actually investigating the options.
gollark: What a strange name.
gollark: You are to wait while I:- type- think- move a mouse cursor around somewhat- get distracted by unrelated topics repeatedly
gollark: Too bad, you are to wait.
gollark: Somewhat, maybe. Please hold on while I engage in typing™.

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era

References
  1. Don Dwiggins (Winter 1971). "Meet the Foo Fighter". Sports Planes.
  2. http://www.stewartaircraft.com/main.html
  3. Sport Aviation, Jan 1973, pp 53-55. Foo Fighter Flight Report
  • Sport Aviation, Jan 1973, pp 53–55. Foo Fighter Flight Report
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.