Spiritual Counterfeits Project

The Spiritual Counterfeits Project (also known as SCP) is a Christian evangelical parachurch organization located in Berkeley, California. Since its inception in the early 1970s, it has been involved in the fields of Christian apologetics and the Christian countercult movement. Its current president is Tal Brooke. In its role as a think tank, SCP has sought to publish evangelically based analyses of new religious movements, New Age movements, and alternative spiritualities in light of broad cultural trends. SCP has also been at the center of two controversial US lawsuits, one involving church-state issues (Malnak v. Yogi) and the other being a religious defamation case (Lee et al v. Duddy et al).

Background

The Spiritual Counterfeits Project began as a ministry within the Christian World Liberation Front, an outreach to students at the University of California, Berkeley, It was founded by Brooks Alexander, David Fetcho (who named the ministry), and Bill Squires. Both Alexander and Fetcho were converts to Christianity from the counterculture. Alexander had participated in the psychedelic drug usage of the counterculture, was an initiate of Transcendental Meditation, and lived in the famous Haight-Ashbury community in San Francisco.[1] Fetcho had been involved with the Ananda Marga Yoga Society before converting to Christianity.[2]

History of SCP

In 1973 Brooks Alexander and others distributed Christian leaflets at Millennium '73, a festival held at the Houston Astrodome by Guru Maharaj Ji's Divine Light Mission.[3] That same year, Alexander, Fetcho and David Haddon launched a grass-roots campaign to oppose the practice of Transcendental Meditation in US public high schools. In 1975 the SCP was formally incorporated as an "independent Christian nonprofit organization."[4]

The four primary purposes of SCP included:

"1. To research today's spiritual movements and critique them biblically. 2. To equip Christians with the knowledge, analysis, and discernment that will enable them to understand the significance of today's spiritual explosion. 3. To suggest a Christian response which engages the church with all levels of situation. 4. To bring the good news of Jesus Christ and extend a hand of rescue to those in psycho-spiritual bondage."[5]

Transcendental Meditation

The campaign against Transcendental Meditation (TM) was premised on the grounds that transcendental meditation represented itself as a non-religious activity and was promoted as the Science of Creative Intelligence (SCI). The SCP staff maintained that transcendental meditation was not religiously neutral, and that its SCI was based on Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's Hindu faith. The SCP's Right On newsletter was the first to publish portions of the TM teacher's manual, including details of the Puja ceremony.[6]

The focal point for an anti-Transcendental Meditation campaign was a civil action lawsuit No.76-431 in the US District Court of New Jersey. The lawsuit known as Malnak v. Yogi contested whether transcendental meditation was religious or not, and if the former then it could not be taught in US public high schools. The plaintiffs, which included the SCP, presented evidence to show that the initiatory ceremony of transcendental meditation (known as the puja) was religious in nature and the practice of meditation presented as SCI involved chanting Hindu mantras.[7] SCP's Brooks Alexander and Bill Squires, along with SCP's attorney Michael Woodruff, moved into the Malnak's home and provided research, fund raising, and legal support, respectively.[8]

Justice Curtis Meanor who presided over the case concluded that Transcendental Meditation/SCI are "religious in nature within the context of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and the teaching thereof in the New Jersey public schools is therefore unconstitutional."[9] On February 2, 1979, the Third Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's ruling.[10] The success of this campaign catapulted the SCP into prominence among evangelical Christians in North America and internationally.[11]

Local church controversy

In 1977 SCP published an 80-page booklet called The God-Men: Witness Lee and the Local Church. An expanded edition was published first in 1979 in German as Die Sonderlehre by Schwengeler-Verlag and then in 1981 in English as The God-Men: An Inquiry into Witness Lee and the Local Church by InterVarsity Press. In the book SCP alleged that the Local Church was both theologically and sociologically deviant. The dispute between the Local Church and SCP escalated into a lawsuit for defamation that was filed in Oakland, California in December 1980 and known as Lee et al v. Duddy et al.[12]

According to Bill Squires of SCP, the four and a half years of pre-trial preparations and depositions involved expenditure that brought SCP into legal debt with their defense lawyers. The parties were to appear in court on March 4, 1985, to schedule the start of the defamation trial. Squires said, "The law firm representing us withdrew from the case" and SCP decided to file for Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code. Squires stated, "That move imposed an immediate stay on the plaintiffs' action against us, thus ending the financial drain of litigation. On that day, SCP, while continuing its larger ministry, officially dropped out of the lawsuit."[13] However, SCP’s version of these events has been disputed.[14] While SCP's Chapter 11 filing was proceeding through California bankruptcy court, action against the German publisher and the second edition's primary author proceeded, resulting in a finding that the book was "in all major respects false, defamatory and unprivileged, and, therefore, libelous."[15] The judge’s award of $11.9 million in damages was to that date the largest awarded in a libel case.[16]

Post-litigation history

In the aftermath of the litigation SCP sharply reduced staff and services. In 1989 the entire editorial staff and many other staff members left, some over what they perceived as a radical shift in SCP’s ideology. [17] In 2013 SCP left its office in Berkeley because of severe financial problems and established a virtual office in Pasadena, California. Tal Brooke moved to Hawaii but continued as SCP's president and editor of its newsletter.[18]

gollark: Do you mean a Discord bot?
gollark: There's already MathBot, which among other things can render TeX or something, but sure?
gollark: I'm hopeful on the driver thing, as their integrated drivers work fine.
gollark: They *currently* only make iGPUs, but are releasing dGPUs soon™️.
gollark: And Intel's releasing GPUs this year too. Exciting.

References
  1. Alexander, Brooks (1984). Reflections of an Ex (revised ed.). Berkeley, CA: SCP. Originally published in Right On, September 1973.
  2. Fetcho, David (Winter 1984). "Last Meditation/Lotus Adept". SCP Journal. Vol. 6 no. 1. pp. 31–36.
  3. Haddon, David (1974). "The Houston Report on the Festival of Maharaji". Right On.
  4. Yamamoto, J. Isamu (Winter 1984). "Preface". SCP Journal. Vol. 6 no. 1. p. 5.
  5. "Masthead". SCP Journal. Vol. 2 no. 1. August 1978. p. 2.
  6. Dart, John (October 29, 1977). "TM Ruled Religious, Banned in Schools". Los Angeles Times. p. 29.
  7. Patton, John E. (1976). The Case Against TM in the Schools. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
  8. Gordon, Sarah Barringer (2010). "Malnak v. Yogi: The New Age and the New Law". In Griffin, Leslie C. (ed.). Law and Religion: Cases in Context. Austin, TX: Wolters Kluwer. pp. 14–16.
  9. TM in Court. Berkeley, CA: SCP. 1978. p. 74.
  10. Malnak v. Yogi., 440 F. Supp. 1284 (Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1977).
  11. "U.S. Court of Appeals Rules Against TM Movement". Archived from the original on March 14, 2007. Retrieved 2006-02-07.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link), New Religious Movements Up-date 3/2 (July 1979)
  12. Squires, Bill (November 1986). "The Lawsuit in Perspective". SCP Newsletter. Vol. 11 no. 4. p. 6.
  13. Squires, "Lawsuit," p.8.
  14. Brothers, Hear Our Defense (4): Repeating False Witness Concerning SCP Bankruptcy. Fullerton, CA: DCP Press. 2011. pp. 17–28.
  15. Seyranian, Leon J. Statement of Decision (Report).Case No 540 585-9, Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Alameda, June 26, 1985, p. 2
  16. MLRC 2010 Report on Trials and Damages. New York: Media Law Resource Center. 2010. p. 79.
  17. Digitale, Robert (January 15, 1990). "Major Shift at Spiritual Counterfeits Project". Christianity Today. Vol. 34 no. 1. pp. 53–54.
  18. Brooke, Tal (Summer 2013). "SCP Leaps into a New Future". SCP Newsletter. Vol. 17 no. 4. pp. 1, 4–5, 14–15.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.