Soybean mosaic virus

Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is a member of the plant virus genus Potyvirus (family Potyviridae). It infects mainly plants belonging to the family Fabaceae but has also been found infecting other economically important crops.[1][2] SMV is the cause of soybean mosaic disease that occurs in all the soybean productions areas of the world. Soybean (Glycine max) is one of the most important sources of edible oil and proteins and pathogenic infections are responsible for annual yield losses of about $4 billion dollars in the United States. Among these pathogens, SMV is the most important and prevalent viral pathogen in soybean production worldwide.[3] It causes yield reductions of about 8% to 35% but losses as high as 94% have been reported.[1]

Soybean mosaic virus
Virus classification
(unranked): Virus
Realm: Riboviria
Kingdom: Orthornavirae
Phylum: Pisuviricota
Class: Stelpaviricetes
Order: Patatavirales
Family: Potyviridae
Genus: Potyvirus
Species:
Soybean mosaic virus

The virus was first reported from Connecticut in 1915 and described in 1921.[4] Its genome is a single stranded positive sense RNA of about 9.5kb that encodes at least 11 proteins.[3] SMV virion is non envelope, flexuous, filamentous of about 720-800 nm long and 12-15 nm in diameter.[5]

Host and symptoms

In terms of economic damage, soybean is the most important host plant for SMV.[1] However, plants belonging to the families Fabaceae, Amaranthaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Passifloraceae, Schrophulariaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae, Leguminosae and Caricaceae have also been reported infected with SMV.[6][1][2] Fabaceae has been shown to have the largest number of genera infected by SMV.[2] Hosts differ in susceptibility depending on the viral strain and latent infection has been reported in several hosts.[1]

Symptoms are usually more obvious on young, rapidly growing leaves and are variable depending on the host genotype, virus strain, plant age at the moment of infection and the environment.[7][1] Leaves are the tissue where the viral infection is localized and where the infection starts. Macroscopic symptoms can range from apparently asymptomatic plants to severely mottled and deformed leaves.[7] Most of the infected cultivars become slightly stunted and show fewer pods that are sometimes dwarfed and flattened, without hairs and seeds.[1] Trifoliate leaves show distinct mosaic and mottling symptoms with light and dark green areas that later can become raised or blistered along the main veins.[7][1] Chlorosis has also been reported as a symptom of SMV infection especially between the dark green areas. Leaves can appear curly or waved and some cultivars show necrotic local lesions that can later merge into veinal necrosis followed by yellowing and leaf abscission.[7] Some strains can cause severe stunting, systemic necrosis, leaf yellowing, petiole and stem necrosis, terminal necrosis and defoliation leading to the death of the plant due to systemic spread of the viral infection.[1]

Seeds can also show symptoms of viral infection with SMV showing a brown or black mottle that is thought to be associated with suppression of posttranscriptional gene silencing of chalcone synthase by a silencing suppressor protein encoded by SMV.[1] Germination and size of the seeds is considerably reduced as compared with healthy plants seeds. Mottling does not indicate that the virus is present in seeds as not all mottled seeds contain virus and not all seeds from virus infected plants are mottled.[1]

Symptoms are sometimes hard to differentiate when temperatures are above 30 °C and can also be confused with growth regulator herbicide damage where the leaves elongate. Rugosity is most severe in plants grown in temperatures of around 18 °C, while general symptoms are less severe at 24-25 °C. Temperature also influences the incubation period and the time between infection and symptom appearance that ranges from 4 days at 29.5 °C to 14 days at 18.5 °C.[1] Additionally, SMV appears to have a synergistic interaction with Bean Pod Mottle Virus (BPMV) as plants infected with both viruses show drastically more severe symptoms than plants infected with only one virus.[7][8]

Disease cycle
Replication and movement of soybean mosaic virus (SMV) within cell

The main transmission mechanism of SMV is by aphids. 32 aphid species, of 15 different genera, have been shown to transmit SMV in a non-persistent manner. The most important species in terms of efficient transmission include Acyrthosiphon pisum, Aphis fabae, A. glycines, Myzus persicae and Rhopalosiphum maidis. Recently, the soybean aphid (A. glycines) was introduced into North America and because of its high transmission efficiency it has caused major concern. However, it has not been shown that the presence of the aphid along with the other migrating non-colonizing aphids that transmit SMV have significantly increased SMV incidence in the region.[9]

SMV is easily transmitted mechanically when the plant is in direct contact with tools, humans or other plants.[2] The virus moves systemically throughout the plant and can be detected in all tissues including roots.[1]

Transmission through seeds is also considerably important in SMV epidemiology as seeds are the source of primary inoculum with secondary spread by aphids occurring at relatively fast rate.[1] Virus in seeds remains infective for a long period of time and viable virus can be recovered from seeds that no longer have germinating capacity. The transmission efficiency through seeds is dependent upon cultivar with incidence of seed transmission higher in plants infected before the onset of flowering. In the majority of commercial cultivars grown, seed transmission is less than 5% with ranges between no transmission and 75% transmission in older cultivars.[1]

As mentioned before, early plant infections reduces pod sets, increases seed coat mottling and reduces seed size and weight, while late season infection has little effect on seed quality and yield. Additional effects of SMV include reduced oil content and nodulation. SMV also affects nitrogen fixation and can increase susceptibility to other pathogens.[1]

Time of occurrence

All season.

Conditions favoring disease

Plants infected when young tend to show more symptoms than plants that infected when older. Higher activity or populations of aphids favor virus transmission.

Disease management

The main management tool for avoiding yield reduction and severe damage of plants are preventive methods. The use of certified virus-free seeds and timing of planting are crucial to avoid high vector populations when plants are still young.[1] Infected seeds are the most important way that SMV is transmitted and serve as a primary source of infection for later dispersal by aphids. Late planting coincides with higher populations of aphids, which may increase the probability of virus transmission to young seedlings. Infection in the early growth stages has the highest impact in yield loss and seed quality compared to infection late in the life cycle.[10] Serological and molecular techniques for screening viral presence in seeds can be used for detection in seed lots.[1]

Control of aphid vectors should be able to significantly decrease the infection levels. However, no control methods for aphids have been yet successfully developed.[9][7] Insecticides are not considered effective in reducing transmission of SMV by aphids as aphids present at spraying are killed, but the field is quickly recolonized by winged aphids and virus transmission resumes. Aphids that get in contact with the insecticide residues on the leaf surface are killed but are still capable of virus transmission prior to death. Growers shouldn’t spray insecticide below the soybean threshold since using an insecticide will only suppress the vector but not the disease and may make the virus problem worse.[10]

The most effective disease management should be based upon using resistant varieties. At least three naturally occurring independent loci (Rsv1, Rsv3 and Rsv4) have been identified and mapped for resistance to SMV.[1] Because of the high variability of SMV, use of single resistance genes is potentially dangerous and pyramiding available sources of resistance is recommended to achieve disease control.[11]

gollark: According to my calculations, you see, that would be bad.
gollark: I wonder if the neural networks trained for image recognition and stuff have similar types of weird glitch (obviously not exactly the same problems, but similar classes of thing).
gollark: The take-home lesson is probably just that our brains' visual processing is weirdly messed up in some ways.
gollark: Why would you use Flash? Does anything actually still let you run that?
gollark: - https://esolangs.org/wiki/Brainfuck,_but_every_%2B_is_replaced_with_the_bee_movie_script- https://esolangs.org/wiki/Unary- https://esolangs.org/wiki/And_then"Hello I would like to print Hello World please"THEY HAVE PLAYED US FOR ABSOLUTE FOOLS

See also
  • Soybean crinkle leaf virus

References
  1. Hill, John H.; Whitham, Steven A. (2014). "Control of Virus Diseases in Soybeans". Control of Plant Virus Diseases - Seed-Propagated Crops. Advances in Virus Research. 90. pp. 355–390. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801246-8.00007-x. ISBN 9780128012468. PMID 25410106.
  2. Benscher D, Pappu SS, Niblett CL, Varón de Agudelo F, Morales F, Hodson E, Alvarez E, Acosta O, Lee, RF (1996). "A strain of Soybean mosaic virus infecting Passiflora spp. In Colombia" (PDF). Plant Dis. 80 (3): 258–262. doi:10.1094/PD-80-0258.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. Liu, Jian-Zhong; Fang, Yuan; Pang, Hongxi (2016). "The Current Status of the Soybean-Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) Pathosystem". Frontiers in Microbiology. 7: 1906. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01906. ISSN 1664-302X. PMC 5127794. PMID 27965641.
  4. Gardner M, Kendrick JB (1921). "Soybean mosaic". Journal of Agricultural Research. 22: 111–114.
  5. "ViralZone Potyvirus". viralzone.expasy.org. Retrieved 2017-12-11.
  6. Nandakishor, H.V.; Kumaraswamy, B.; Mane, S.S.; Veena, G. Amrutha (2017). "Host Range Studies of Soybean Mosaic Virus". International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6 (7): 304–308. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.035.
  7. "Soybean mosaic virus : Crop Diseases : University of Minnesota Extension". www.extension.umn.edu. Retrieved 2017-12-11.
  8. Calvert LA, Ghabrial SA (1983). "Enhancement by Soybean mosaic virus of Bean pod mottle virus Titer in Doubly Infected Soybean". Physiology and Biochemistry. 73: 992, 997.
  9. Pedersen, Palle; Grau, Craig; Cullen, Eileen; Koval, Nancy; Hill, John H. (2007-09-18). "Potential for Integrated Management of Soybean Virus Disease". Plant Disease. 91 (10): 1255–1259. doi:10.1094/PDIS-91-10-1255. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30780527.
  10. "Soybean mosaic virus and Alfalfa mosaic virus". WISCONSIN FIELD CROPS PATHOLOGY. Retrieved 2017-12-11.
  11. Maroof, Saghai; A, M.; Jeong, S. C.; Gunduz, I.; Tucker, D. M.; Buss, G. R.; Tolin, S. A. (2008-03-01). "Pyramiding of Soybean Mosaic Virus Resistance Genes by Marker-Assisted Selection All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher". Crop Science. 48 (2): 517–526. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0479. ISSN 1435-0653.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.