South West Staffordshire (UK Parliament constituency)
South West Staffordshire was a parliamentary constituency in Staffordshire. It returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post system.
| South West Staffordshire | |
|---|---|
| Former County constituency for the House of Commons | |
| County | Staffordshire |
| 1974–1983 | |
| Number of members | One |
| Replaced by | South Staffordshire |
| Created from | Wolverhampton North East, Brierley Hill and Cannock (parts) |
History
The constituency was created for the February 1974 general election, and abolished for the 1983 general election.
Boundaries
The Rural Districts of Cannock and Seisdon.
Members of Parliament
| Election | Member | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1974 | Patrick Cormack | Conservative | |
| 1983 | renamed South Staffordshire | ||
Election results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Patrick Cormack | 23,878 | 48.84 | n/a | |
| Labour | Ivor Wymer | 14,120 | 28.88 | n/a | |
| Liberal | Eric Freeman | 10,408 | 21.29 | n/a | |
| English National | David Maxwell | 482 | 0.99 | n/a | |
| Majority | 9,758 | 19.96 | n/a | ||
| Turnout | 48,888 | 80.74 | n/a | ||
| Conservative win | |||||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Patrick Cormack | 22,604 | 49.11 | +0.27 | |
| Labour | Ivor Wymer | 15,065 | 32.73 | +3.85 | |
| Liberal | Anthony Lambert | 8,355 | 18.15 | -3.14 | |
| Majority | 7,539 | 16.38 | -3.58 | ||
| Turnout | 46,024 | 75.40 | -5.34 | ||
| Conservative hold | Swing | -1.79 | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Patrick Cormack | 32,153 | 60.39 | +11.28 | |
| Labour | GJ Lane | 14,720 | 27.65 | -5.08 | |
| Liberal | R Fox | 5,460 | 10.25 | -7.90 | |
| National Front | J Thomas | 912 | 1.71 | n/a | |
| Majority | 17,433 | 32.74 | +16.36 | ||
| Turnout | 53,245 | 79.02 | +3.62 | ||
| Conservative hold | Swing | +8.18 | |||
gollark: No overloading... except `make`/`new`, which just do all kinds of magic depending on what the language implementors wanted.
gollark: It has a sort of "don't trust the programmer" mentality with lots of stuff.
gollark: They also just bodge in a bunch of half-features instead of actually making a sane consistent language in the interest of being "simple".
gollark: Er, package management.
gollark: Until recently the packaging model was just "pull latest version from specified online git repository".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.