Soft coup

A soft coup, sometimes referred to as a silent coup, is a coup d'état without the use of violence, but based on a conspiracy or plot that has as its objective the taking of state power by partially or wholly illegal means, in order to facilitate an exchange of political leadership - and in some cases also of the current institutional order.[1][2]

Context

A soft coup is a strategy attributed to the American political scientist Gene Sharp, a Professor Emeritus of political science at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, who has been a theorist and author of groundbreaking works on the dynamics of nonviolent conflict. He studied the potential to spark, guide, and maximize the power of sometimes short-lived mass uprisings, as he tried to understand how unarmed insurrections have been far more politically significant than observers focused on military warfare have cared to admit.[3]

According to Axel Kaiser, a Chilean lawyer member of the Mises Institute, soft coup is nothing but a conspiracy theory used by Latin American populists who seek the centralization of power, but do so under the pretense of improving democracy. Kayser argues that the Latin American leaders rationale is that democracy should be a system where the general will must be absolute, and that the populist leader describes himself as the representative of the general will by virtue of having been elected by the people. Kayser says that these leaders feel that the will of the leader equals the general will, and that any limits on the will of the leader would be also a limit to the general will itself.[4] In this scenario, opposition to the leader is supposedly treated as an act against democracy, which would be used to justify persecution of the opposition, forced nationalizations and limits to the freedom of the press[5] - a notion of democracy that is opposed to the one held in the United States, which considers instead that rulers must have limits to their power,[5] but also conflicting with minority rights.[6]

As several military coups took place in South America during the 20th century, in particular during the Cold War, there is a strong popular perception of those coups as highly negative events. The mere legacy of Operation Condor evokes great mistrust among the general population. Hence, as the supporters of the deposed leaders often attribute the old coups to generalized authors instead of specific ones (such as the press, the private sector of the economy, the judiciary and imperialism), they tend to argue that the alleged coups have been attempted by those same authors.[7]

Notable cases
gollark: I've analytically continued cryoapioforms into the complex plane.
gollark: Hey lyric look.
gollark: It would not.
gollark: I'm sure you'd like to think so.
gollark: The International Standards Organisation cannot save you.

References
  1. Roberto Scaruffi. "What coups d'État are". The mechanics of the political destabilisation and Constitutional subversion in the 1990s’ Italy. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2018-02-14.
  2. Steven A. Cook. "Military soft 'coup' in Egypt has precedent". CSMonitor.com.
  3. Engler, Mark (2013). "The Machiavelli of Nonviolence: Gene Sharp and the Battle Against Corporate Rule". Dissent Magazine. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
  4. Kaiser, p. 53
  5. Kaiser, p. 55
  6. Kaiser, p. 56
  7. "When a "coup" is not a coup". The Economist. April 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2016.

Bibliography
  • Kaiser, Axel (2016). El engaño populista [The populist lie] (in Spanish). Colombia: Ariel. ISBN 978-987-3804-39-7.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.