Soft State

The Soft State is a term introduced by Gunnar Myrdal in his Asian Drama to describe a general societal “indiscipline” prevalent in South Asia and by extension much of the developing world - in comparison to kind of modern state that had emerged in Europe. Myrdal used the term to describe:

... all the various types of social indiscipline which manifest themselves by deficiencies in legislation and, in particular, law observance and enforcement, a widespread disobedience by public officials and, often, their collusion with powerful persons and groups ... whose conduct they should regulate. Within the concept of the soft states belongs also corruption (Myrdal, (1970), p 208).
This article is about the term in sociology. For the term in computer science, see Soft state.

For Myrdal a major causal factor was colonial powers' destruction of many of the traditional centers of local power and influence and failure to create viable alternatives. Coupled with this was the development of an attitude of disobedience to any authority which was central to the nationalist politics resistance. This attitude persisted after independence. Such soft states are seen as unlikely to capable of imposing the right development policies and would be unwilling to act against corruption at all levels.[1][2][3]

Soft state paradigm

According to the soft state paradigm, there are two types of statehood: empirical and juridical, or soft. The state in its empirical sense is defined and determined by its demonstrable capacity in such matters as competitive pressures of the classical states-system (for example, was the respect and recognition accorded by other governments) and the development of armed forces, courts and magistrates, and police forces. This type of state, originating in competitive Europe, was built by under strong pressures for disintegration, both domestic and international. This empirical state is also found in North America, South America, the Middle East, and Asia. The juridical state is the novel-moral-legal foundation of the collaborative states-system that has emerged in many parts of the ex-colonial world, particularly tropical Africa; it lacks the essentials of statehood, sovereignty is guaranteed by the world community of states as embodied in the United Nations.[4]

gollark: I'm trying to confirm what you said about WiFi there.
gollark: I think that's America-based?
gollark: It says here the IEEE developed the standards.
gollark: How is WiFi an Australian thing? I thought it was mostly a globally developed standard.
gollark: That isn't ONLY dependent on the intelligence of local people, you know.

References
  1. Myrdal, G., (1968), Asian Drama. An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, 3 Vols., New York: Pantheon
  2. Myrdal, G., (1970) The Challenge of World Poverty. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  3. Myrdal, G., (1970) The 'Soft State' in Undeveloped Countries. In Unfashionable Economics: Essays in Honour of Lord Balogh, edited by Paul Streeten. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  4. Sangmpam, S. N. (September 1993). "Neither Soft nor Dead: The African State is Alive and Well". African Studies Review. 36: 73–94.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.