Small icosacronic hexecontahedron

In geometry, the small icosacronic hexecontahedron (or small lanceal trisicosahedron) is a nonconvex isohedral polyhedron. It is the dual of the uniform small icosicosidodecahedron. Its faces are kites. Part of each kite lies inside the solid, hence is invisible in solid models.

Small icosacronic hexecontahedron

Type	Star polyhedron
Face
Elements	F = 60, E = 120 V = 52 (χ = −8)
Symmetry group	I_h, [5,3], *532
Index references	DU₃₁
dual polyhedron	Small icosicosidodecahedron

3D model of a small icosacronic hexecontahedron

Proportions

The kites have two angles of $\arccos({\frac {3}{4}}-{\frac {1}{20}}{\sqrt {5}})\approx 50.342\,524\,343\,87^{\circ }$ , one of $\arccos(-{\frac {1}{12}}-{\frac {19}{60}}{\sqrt {5}})\approx 142.318\,554\,460\,55^{\circ }$ and one of $\arccos(-{\frac {5}{12}}-{\frac {1}{60}}{\sqrt {5}})\approx 116.996\,396\,851\,70^{\circ }$ . The dihedral angle equals $\arccos({\frac {-44-3{\sqrt {5}}}{61}})\approx 146.230\,659\,755\,53^{\circ }$ . The ratio between the lengths of the long and short edges is ${\frac {31+5{\sqrt {5}}}{38}}\approx 1.110\,008\,944\,41$ .

gollark: Unicode should be the default, and something should not be named `char` if it cannot actually hold a character.

gollark: Just because many old languages do the char-is-byte thing doesn't make it not stupid and harmful in this era of unicode.

gollark: Wrong and bad. A char should be a !!CODEPOINT!!.

gollark: Yes. This is what I am complaining about.

gollark: And not have a special `iterator` keyword to declare them?

References

Wenninger, Magnus (1983), Dual Models, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-54325-5, MR 0730208

External links

Weisstein, Eric W. "Small icosacronic hexecontahedron". MathWorld.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.