Sir Samuel Fludyer, 3rd Baronet

Sir Samuel Fludyer, 3rd Baronet (1800–1876) was the grandson of the first Baronet, Sir Samuel Fludyer, who was reckoned at the time of his death to be the richest man in the country with a wealth of £900,000.[1] He was the only son of Sir Samuel Brudenell Fludyer, who inherited most of the first Sir Samuel's fortune, and had his children painted by Thomas Lawrence, the foremost portrait painter of the time, indicating the family's wealth and social standing. The portrait shows Sir Samuel (3rd Baronet) between his sisters Maria and Carolina Louisa.

Thomas Lawrence: Children of Sir Samuel Fludyer (1806),Museu de Arte de São Paulo

He was educated at Christ Church, Oxford and succeeded to the baronetcy in 1833. After an argument with his sisters Sir Samuel was admitted to Ticehurst Private Asylum in Sussex in 1839 and stayed there until his death.[2]

Financial motivations

He was placed in the asylum under certificates from Drs Munro and Sutherland and on the order of his brother-in-law Mr Cobbett Derby, Jr. As a result of his having been confined he died a bachelor and had no issue, and his considerable estate was divided equally between his sisters Maria Fludyer and Caroline Louisa Derby. [3] His father's will stipulated that if Samuel died without an heir his fortune would be transferred to George Fludyer, the second Sir Samuel's brother and his heirs male, along with the Baronetcy, but it reserved £80,000 for Samuel to leave at his discretion. Under the will of the third baronet, each of his sisters would inherit £10,000, but he left no residuary legatee.[4] In the end, the sisters inherited the whole £80,000 shared between them.

In addition, the proprietors of the asylum gained from Sir Samuel's incarceration. At a charge of 12 guineas per week he was the highest paying patient at Ticehurst in the 1840s.[5]

Subsequent developments

His case was one of five from Ticehurst taken up by the Lunacy Law Reform Committee (founded 1873), the others being John William Thomas, Thomas Preston (d.1877), Walter Marshall (b.l837) and Herman Charles Merivale.[4] Louisa Lowe, a former secretary of the Lunacy Law Reform Society (founded 1873) took up the story in her diatribe against private asylums, the Bastilles of England (1883).

The Legislation under which he was incarcerated was replaced by the Lunacy Act 1890.

gollark: I can't actually tell if I can do those "at the same time" or am just switching between them pretty fast.
gollark: But it's fine to just assume something about analyzing emotions and act based on that?
gollark: I don't know about in general.
gollark: This is obviously true for *some* stuff like mental maths.
gollark: Also if you're acting based on it.

See also

References
  1. Members Constituencies Parliaments Surveys. "FLUDYER, Samuel (?1704-68), of Lee, Kent". History of Parliament Online. Retrieved 2017-05-03.
  2. Psychiatry for the Rich: A History of Ticehurst Private Asylum 1792-1917 By Charlotte MacKenzie, Routledge, 22 Jul 2005 p95
  3. Women, Madness, and Spiritualism: Georgina Weldon and Louisa Lowe, Volume 1 edited by Roy Porter, Helen Nicholson, Bridget Bennett, Taylor & Francis p20 et seq
  4. A FAMILY ASYLUM:A HISTORY OF THE PRIVATE MADHOUSE AT TICEHURST IN SUSSEX, 1792-1917. A thesis presented by Charlotte MacKenzie for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London. December 1986
  5. The Anatomy of Madness: Essays in the History of Psychiatry, Volume 2 edited by William F. Bynum, Roy Porter, Michael Shepherd, Taylor and Francis, p 163
Baronetage of Great Britain
Preceded by
Samuel Brudenell Fludyer		 Baronet
(of Lee Place)
1833–1876		 Succeeded by
John Henry Fludyer
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.