Simulation theory of empathy

Simulation theory of empathy is a theory that holds that humans anticipate and make sense of the behavior of others by activating mental processes that, if carried into action, would produce similar behavior. This includes intentional behavior as well as the expression of emotions. The theory states that children use their own emotions to predict what others will do. Therefore, we project our own mental states onto others.
Simulation theory is not primarily a theory of empathy, but rather a theory of how people understand others—that they do so by way of a kind of empathetic response. This theory uses more biological evidence than other theories of mind, such as the theory-theory.

Origin

Simulation theory is based in philosophy of mind, a branch of philosophy that studies the nature of the mind and its relationship to the brain, especially the work of Alvin Goldman and Robert Gordon. The discovery of mirror neurons in macaque monkeys has provided a physiological mechanism for the common coding between perception and action (see Wolfgang Prinz)[1] and the hypothesis of a similar mirror neuron system in the human brain.[2][3] Since the discovery of the mirror neuron system, many studies have been carried out to examine the role of this system in action understanding, emotion and other social functions.

Development

Mirror neurons are activated both when actions are executed and the actions are observed. This unique function of mirror neurons may explain how people recognize and understand the states of others; mirroring observed action in the brain as if they conducted the observed action.[4]

Two sets of evidence suggest that mirror neurons in the monkey have a role in action understanding. First, the activation of mirror neurons requires biological effectors such as hand or mouth. Mirror neurons do not respond to the action with tools like pliers.[5] Mirror neurons respond to neither the sight of an object alone nor an action without an object (intransitive action). Umilta and colleagues[6] demonstrated that a subset of mirror neurons fired when final critical part of the action was not visible to the observer. The experimenter showed his hand moving toward a cube and grasping it, and later showed the same action without showing later part grasping the cube (placing the cube behind the occluder). Mirror neurons fired on both visible and invisible conditions. On the other hand, mirror neurons did not discharge when the observer knew that there was not a cube behind the occluder.

Second, responses of mirror neurons to same actions are different depending on context of the action. A single cell recording experiment with monkeys demonstrated the different level of activation of mouth mirror neurons when monkey observed mouth movement depending on context (ingestive actions such as sucking juice vs. communicative actions such as lip-smacking or tongue protrusions).[7] An fMRI study also showed that mirror neurons respond to the action of grasping a cup differently depending on context (to drink a cup of coffee vs. to clean a table on which a cup was placed).[8]

One criticism of mirror neurons is that since they show that same muscle groups is used for someone watching an action as someone completing an action, they only predict actions, not beliefs or desires. While someone acts a certain way, they may not believe that what they are doing is the right thing.

Emotion understanding

Shared neural representation for a motor behavior and its observation has been extended into the domains of feelings and emotions. Not only movements but also facial expressions activate the same brain regions that are activated by direct experiences. In an fMRI study, same brain regions on action representation found to be activated when people both imitated and observed emotional facial expressions such as happy, sad, angry, surprise, disgust, and afraid.[9]

Observing video clips that displayed facial expression of feeling disgust activated the neural networks typical of direct experience of disgust.[10] Similar results have been found in the case of touch. Watching movies that someone touched legs or faces activated the somatosensory cortex for direct feeling of the touch.[11] A similar mirror system exists in perceiving pain. When people see other people feel pain, people feel pain not only affectively,[12] but also sensorially.[13]

These results suggest that understanding other's feelings and emotions is driven not by cognitive deduction of what the stimuli means but by automatic activation of somatosensory neurons. A recent study on pupil size directly demonstrated emotion perception was automatic process modulated by mirror systems.[14] When people saw sad faces, pupil sizes influenced viewers in perceiving and judging emotional states without explicit awareness of differences of pupil size. When pupil size was 180% of original size, people perceived a sad face as less negative and less intense than when pupil was smaller than or equal to original pupil size. This mechanism was correlated with brain regions that implicated in emotion process, the amygdala. Furthermore, viewers mimic the size of their own pupils to those of sad faces they watched. Considering that pupil size is beyond voluntary control, the change of pupil size upon emotion judgment is a good indication that understanding emotions is automatic process. However, the study could not find other emotional faces such as happiness and anger influence pupil size as sadness did.

Epistemological role of empathy

Understanding other's actions and emotions is believed to facilitate efficient human communication. Based on findings from neuroimaging studies, de Vignemont and Singer[15] proposed empathy as a crucial factor in human communication arguing its epistemological role; "Empathy might enable us to make faster and more accurate predictions of other people's needs and actions and discover salient aspects of our environment." Mental mirroring of actions and emotions may enable humans to understand other's actions and their related environment quickly, and thus help humans communicate efficiently.[4]

In an fMRI study, a mirror system has been proposed as common neural substrates to mediate the experiences of basic emotions.[16] Participants watched video clips of happy, sad, angry and disgust facial expressions, and measured their empathy quotient (EQ). Specific brain regions relevant to the four emotions were found to be correlated with the EQ while the mirror system (i.e., the left dorsal inferior frontal gyrus/premotor cortex) was correlated to the EQ across all emotions. The authors interpreted this result as an evidence that action perception mediates face perception to emotion perception.

Empathy for pain

A paper published in Science (Singer et al., 2005)[13] challenges the idea that pain sensations and mirror neurons play a role in empathy for pain. Specifically, the authors found that activity in the anterior insula and the anterior cingulate cortex was present both when one's self and another person were presented with a painful stimulus, two regions known to be responsible for the affective experience of pain, but the rest of the pain matrix, responsible for sensation, was not active. Furthermore, participants merely saw the hand of another person with the electrode on it, making it unlikely that 'mirroring' could have caused the empathic response. However, a number of other studies, using magnetoencephalography and functional MRI have since demonstrated that empathy for pain does involve the somatosensory cortex, which supports the simulation theory.[17][18][19][20]

Support for anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex being the neural substrates of empathy include Wicker et al., 2003 who report that their "core finding is that the anterior insula is activated both during observation of disgusted facial expressions and during the emotion of disgust evoked by unpleasant odorants"[10] (p. 655).

Furthermore, one study demonstrated that "for actions, emotions, and sensations both animate and inanimate touch activates our inner representation of touch." They note, however that "it is important at this point to clarify the fact that we do not believe that the activation we observe evolved in order to empathize with other objects or human beings"[11] (p. 343).

Empathy activating altruism
See also: Empathy-altruism

This model states that empathy activates only one interpersonal motivation: altruism. Theoretically, this model makes sense, because empathy is an other-focused emotion. There is an impressive history of research suggesting that empathy, when activated, causes people to act in ways to benefit the other, such as receiving electric shocks for the other.[21][22] These findings have often been interpreted in terms of empathy causing increased altruistic motivation, which in turn causes helping behavior.

gollark: I would honestly expect the balance to tilt more towards "more player satisfaction", though.
gollark: I don't have any, but that doesn't mean the status quo is fine.
gollark: The raffle numbers are far too low.
gollark: Because you can increase average player satisfaction!
gollark: I mean, prizes in the market would have been pretty good for everyone. Doesn't even need that much hunting but does require some actual gameplay.

See also

References
  1. di Pellegrino, G.; Fadiga, L.; Fogassi, L.; Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). "Understanding motor events - A neurophysiological study" (PDF). Experimental Brain Research. 91 (1): 176–180. doi:10.1007/BF00230027. PMID 1301372.
  2. Preston, S.D. & de Wall, F.B.M. (2002). "Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases" (PDF). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 25 (1): 1–20, discussion 20–71. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.554.2794. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018. PMID 12625087.
  3. Iacoboni, M.; Woods, R. P.; Brass, M.; Bekkering, H.; Mazziotta, J. C. & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). "Cortical mechanisms of human imitation". Science. 286 (5449): 2526–2528. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.555.8075. doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526. PMID 10617472.
  4. Gallese, V.; Keysers, C. & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). "A unifying view of the basis of social cognition". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 8 (9): 396–403. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002. PMID 15350240.
  5. Gallese, V.; Fadiga, L.; Fogassi, L. & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). "Action recognition in the premotor cortex" (PDF). Brain. 119 (Pt 2): 593–609. doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.593. PMID 8800951.
  6. Umilta, M. A.; Kohler, E.; Gallese, V.; Fogassi, L.; Fadiga, L.; Keysers, C.; et al. (2001). "I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study". Neuron. 31 (1): 155–165. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00337-3. PMID 11498058.
  7. Ferrari, P. F.; Gallese, V.; Rizzolatti, G. & Fogassi, L. (2003). "Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex". European Journal of Neuroscience. 17 (8): 1703–1714. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.177.2287. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02601.x. PMID 12752388.
  8. Iacoboni, M.; Molnar-Szakacs, I.; Gallese, V.; Buccino, G.; Mazziotta, J. C. & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). "Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system". PLOS Biology. 3 (3): 529–535. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079. PMC 1044835. PMID 15736981.
  9. Carr, L.; Iacoboni, M.; Dubeau, M. C.; Mazziotta, J. C. & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). "Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (9): 5497–5502. doi:10.1073/pnas.0935845100. PMC 154373. PMID 12682281.
  10. Wicker, B.; Keysers, C.; Plailly, J.; Royet, J. P.; Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). "Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust". Neuron. 40 (3): 655–664. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00679-2. PMID 14642287.
  11. Keysers, C.; Wicker, B.; Gazzola, V.; Anton, J. L.; Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2004). "A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch". Neuron. 42 (2): 335–346. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00156-4. PMID 15091347.
  12. Avenanti, A.; Paluello, L. M.; Bufalari, I. & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). "Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others' pain". NeuroImage. 32 (1): 316–324. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.010. PMID 16675270.
  13. Singer, T.; Seymour, B.; O'Doherty, J.; Kaube, H.; Dolan, R. J. & Frith, C. D. (2004). "Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain". Science. 303 (5661): 1157–1162. doi:10.1126/science.1093535. hdl:21.11116/0000-0001-A020-5. JSTOR 3836287. PMID 14976305.
  14. Harrison, N. A.; Singer, T.; Rotshtein, P.; Dolan, R. J. & Critchley, H. D. (2006). "Pupillary contagion: Central mechanisms engaged in sadness processing". SCAN. 1 (1): 5–17. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl006. PMC 1716019. PMID 17186063.
  15. de Vignemont, F. & Singer, T. (2006). "The empathic brain: How, when and why?" (PDF). Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10 (10): 435–441. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008. PMID 16949331.
  16. Chakrabarti, B.; Bullmore, E. & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). "Empathizing with basic emotions: Common and discrete neural substrates". Social Neuroscience. 1 (3&4): 364–384. doi:10.1080/17470910601041317. PMID 18633800.
  17. Cheng, Y.; Yang, C.Y.; Lin, C.P.; Lee, P.R. & Decety, J. (2008). "The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: a magnetoencephalography study". NeuroImage. 40 (4): 1833–1840. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.064. PMID 18353686.
  18. Moriguchi, Y.; Decety, J.; Ohnishi, T.; Maeda, M.; Matsuda, H. & Komaki, G. (2007). "Empathy and judging other's pain: An fMRI study of alexithymia". Cerebral Cortex. 17 (9): 2223–2234. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl130. PMID 17150987.
  19. Lamm, C.; Nusbaum, H.C.; Meltzoff, A.N. & Decety, J. (2007). "What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain". PLoS ONE. 2 (12): e1292. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001292. PMC 2144768. PMID 18091986.
  20. Ogino, Y.; Nemoto, H.; Inui, K.; Saito, S.; Kakigi, R. & Goto, F. (2007). "Inner experience of pain: imagination of pain while viewing images showing painful events forms subjective pain representation in human brain". Cerebral Cortex. 17 (5): 1139–1146. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl023. PMID 16855007.
  21. Batson, C. D (1991). "The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  22. Batson, C. D.; Gilbert, D. T.; Fiske, S. T.; Lindzey, G. (1998). The handbook of social psychology.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.