Shrivardhan (Vidhan Sabha constituency)
Shrivardhan is one of the 288 Vidhan Sabha (Assembly) constituencies of Maharashtra state in Western India.
Members of Assembly
| Election | Member | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | Ukaye A. Shakur A. Karim | Janata Party | |
| 1980 | Ravindra Raut | Indian National Congress (I) | |
| 1985 | A. R. Antulay | Independent | |
| 1990 | Ravindra Raut | Indian National Congress | |
| 1995 | Shyam Sawant | Shiv Sena | |
| 1999 | Shyam Sawant | Shiv Sena | |
| 2004 | Shyam Sawant | Shiv Sena | |
| 2004 (By-election) | Tukaram Surve | Shiv Sena | |
| 2009 | Sunil Tatkare | Nationalist Congress Party | |
| 2014 | Avdhoot Tatkare | Nationalist Congress Party | |
| 2019 | Aditi Sunil Tatkare | Nationalist Congress Party | |
Election results
General elections 2009
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCP | Sunil Tatkare | 66,141 | 47.70 | ||
| SHS | Tukaram Surve | 55,270 | 39.86 | ||
| Independent | Gulam Peshimam | 7,210 | 5.20 | ||
| Majority | 10,871 | 7.84 | |||
| Turnout | 1,38,643 | ||||
| NCP gain from SHS | Swing | ||||
gollark: Firing your pandemic response team a while before a pandemic is at least not as stupid as doing it during one.
gollark: I blame some sort of weird interaction between insurance companies, regulation/the government, consumers of healthcare services, and the companies involved in healthcare.
gollark: The US healthcare system is just really quite broken and there is probably not some individual there who's just going "MWAHAHAHA, my plan to increase the price of healthcare has succeeded, and I could easily make everything reasonable but I won't because I'm evil!", or one person who could decide to just make some stuff free right now without introducing some huge issues. It's a systemic issue.
gollark: Yes, they do have considerations other than minimizing short-term COVID-19 deaths, but that is sensible because other things do matter.
gollark: The US government, and large business owners and whoever else ("capitalism"), don't really want people to die in large numbers *either*, they're:- still *people*- adversely affected by said large numbers dying, because: - if lots of people die in the US compared to elsewhere, they'll look bad come reelection - most metrics people look at will also be worse off if many die and/or are ill for a while - many deaths would reduce demand for their stuff, and they might lose important workers, and more deaths means a worse recession
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.