Shemiah LeGrande
Shemiah LeGrande (born September 16, 1986) is a former American football defensive tackle. He was signed as an undrafted free agent by the Detroit Lions in 2008. He played college football at Hofstra.
| Position: | Defensive tackle | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal information | |||
| Born: | September 16, 1986 Staten Island, New York | ||
| Height: | 6 ft 0 in (1.83 m) | ||
| Weight: | 290 lb (132 kg) | ||
| Career information | |||
| High school: | Curtis (Staten Island, New York) | ||
| College: | Hofstra | ||
| Undrafted: | 2008 | ||
| Career history | |||
| |||
| * Offseason and/or practice squad member only | |||
| Career NFL statistics | |||
| |||
He has also been a member of the Arizona Cardinals, Bloomington Extreme and Hartford Colonials.
Detroit Lions
On May 29, the Detroit Lions signed Shemiah LeGrande as an undrafted free agent. On June 24, he was placed on injured reserve.
Arizona Cardinals
In 2009, LeGrande spent training camp with the Arizona Cardinals. Ultimately, he was cut before the regular season started.
Bloomington Extreme
On December 1, 2009, the Bloomington Extreme announced that they had signed LeGrande for the 2010 season.
gollark: Immediately undergo exponentiation modulo 7, then.
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.