Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co.

Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co.
Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co.
Court	United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Full case name	Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co.
Argued	March 27, 1963
Decided	April 15, 1963
Citation(s)	316 F.2d 304; 137 U.S.P.Q. 275
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting	Sterry R. Waterman, Irving Kaufman, Edward Weinfeld (S.D.N.Y.)
Case opinions
Majority	Kaufman, joined by a unanimous court
Laws applied
	Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101(e)

Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1963)[1], was a landmark case dealing with secondary liability (vicarious liability) for copyright infringement. The law in question was Section 101(e) of the Copyright Act.[2]

Underlying action

The trial court was the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the judge was Thomas F. Murphy.

The plaintiff in the underlying action was the proprietor of certain copyrights (Shapiro, Bernstein and Co.), and it sued two defendants: a record concessionaire (Jalen Amusement Company, Inc.), which allegedly infringed Shapiro's copyrights by selling bootleg copies, and the chain store in which the record concessionaire was based (H. L. Green Company) which allegedly engaged in contributory infringement of those copyrights by virtue of its business relationship with the record concessionaire. The lower court concluded, based on factual findings as to H.L. Green's business relationship with Jalen, that as a matter of law no contributory infringement could have occurred, and dismissed the complaint as to Green. Shapiro appealed this legal conclusion. (The lower court found as a matter of fact that Jalen did in fact infringe, and Jalen declined to appeal.)

Holding

The Court of Appeals, Kaufman, Circuit Judge, held that store owner was liable for unauthorized sale of ‘bootleg’ records infringing on plaintiffs' copyrights. He based this conclusion on the observation that the owner retained ultimate right of supervision over conduct of record concession and concessionaire's employees and reserved for itself a proportionate share of gross receipts from concessionaire's sale of phonograph records. Knowledge was not relevant.

gollark: (there are probably, at most, something like a thousand offices getting that)

gollark: This furniture budget thing probably doesn't add up to a significant amount of the total spend, so it's a bad comparison.

gollark: Apparently American healthcare spending is something like 17% of GDP for some insane reason. So it would be a big fraction of the government budget, if they ran it as efficiently as it currently operated.

gollark: Possibly. Paying people if they want to move out seems more reasonable than doing stupid things to local property markets, or whatever, or adjusting taxes so those already there can afford it.

gollark: That doesn't mean the cost can't/shouldn't be *reduced*.

References

Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1963).
Leaffer, Marshall A. (2010). Understanding Copyright Law. Lexis Nexis. ISBN 9781422478912. Retrieved 18 October 2017.

External links

Text of Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1963) is available from: CourtListener Justia OpenJurist Google Scholar

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1963).

[2] Leaffer, Marshall A. (2010). Understanding Copyright Law. Lexis Nexis. ISBN 9781422478912. Retrieved 18 October 2017.