Sexualization and sexual exploitation in K-pop

K-pop, which was once a conservative music genre, has become sexualized over time.[1] This is in part due to 21st century globalization[2] and the advent of music videos on social media, most specifically, YouTube.[3] K-pop was adopted by the Japanese idol system in the 90s,[1] which brought with it the western male gaze[4] and Lolita culture[5] which eventually morphed into a global phenomenon over a twenty-year time frame.[1] Currently, K-pop idols are "manufactured" to optimize profit by catering to fan desires.[1] In general, male and female idols follow normative feminine and masculine traits, respectively, as defined by the South Korean patriarchal system and in conjunction with a globally desired façade.[6] Femininity is often defined by a suppressed doll state conforming to Lolita ideals. These ideals consist of a slim figure, long legs and a perfect face.[4][7] Korean masculinity requires a soft or cosmopolitan masculinity. That males are expected to be strong and virile, but also possess soft features such as a sweet personality and a cute face.[8] The manifestation of sexualization is represented in every part of the idol republic, but is most commonly found among modern music videos, which have become increasingly sexualized over the last decade.[3] It should also be noted that female idols are often objectified more than male idols, something complementary to the patriarchal Korean culture.[9]

Historical context

The advent of modern K-pop arguably started in 1992, the genre gained significant foothold by 1996 during the industrialization of K-pop, matured through the mid 2000s,[1] and flourished by 2010.[3] Though beauty is an ever-present ideal for Korean popular culture, these time periods represent shifts in beauty norms and K-pop ideals.[1] The early 1990s brought a young, individualistic cuteness to the scene with stocky builds and chubby faces, following the Korean beauty norms of the 1980s.[1] Following the 1980s Japanese idol system, idol groups were generated in the late 1990s, often mimicking western boy bands with innocence and sunny dispositions, a product directed domestically. During this time a review committee censored all Korean music and music videos for sexual and explicit content.[3] The committee was disbanded in June 1996.[3] After an economic crisis in 1997 and success of this domestic product outside South Korea, the innocence morphed into a more romantic and hipper image in the early 2000s. This presented the first major signs of sexualization.[1][3] This transformation was aided by the increased use of music videos.[3] By 2004, a new generation of K-pop was born, sex became prevalent in K-pop and idol-worshiping adolescents came into being.[3] Within a decade, maturation of K-pop driven by hyper-popularized music videos, propelled idols into a visual medium, thus transforming K-pop into the modern beauty standard of low body fat, well-toned muscles, and perfected body features.[1]

Globalization

The late 2000s brought K-pop into its modern era and introduced it to the international stage with the Korean wave in Asia. The early 2010s bolstered K-pop to an international powerhouse with the global Korean wave. K-pop has always been influenced by western musical styles; however, many link its international success to the globalization caused by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout period (during the 1997 South Korean economic crash) in South Korea's neo-liberalization.[2] Post-IMF South Korea has incorporated more Westernized (specifically, Americanized) culture into their products (i.e. exports) in order to prosper in international sales, thus pressing the popular music industry to become more westernized.[2] Integration of westernization brought the western male gaze[2][4] and the hyper-sexualization of products, especially in the popular music scene.[2] Not only was the music itself altered to enhance exportability, but given the modern age of the music video, the performer was also altered.[2] Combining this with Korea's male-dominated society, one that currently ranks the near the bottom of the Global Gender Gap list for modernized societies (presenting the largest gender wage and working condition gaps), produces an overtly sexualized popular music market.[9] Additionally, the proliferation of K-pop allows for South Korea to enter and even dominate the global "cultural war," a concept tied to a battle for attention between the globalized cultures in the modern era. Thus, the government of South Korea encourages the use of K-pop to promote global recognition. However, because of the turbulence of popular culture which is largely due to sexualization, the government maintains no official backing of K-pop but restrains limiting what are allowable K-pop activities.[10] Ergo, without official sponsorship of K-pop, the government unofficially helps it by reducing governmental constraints on it, especially for exported products.[5] This allows the idols to become an unofficial representation of the South Korean culture, promoting cultural pride and building the nation into an "idol republic," meaning that their image (i.e. bodies) belong to the state and represent the state's people.[5]

Critical issues

Sexualization in K-pop is mainly driven by economic reasoning and forces females into a globalized normative femininity and males into a globalized normative masculinity.

Economic reasoning

Entering the world market to help globalize marketable Korean culture was only a byproduct of the economic conditions behind K-pop's evolution. Early K-pop was not well received critically, but its catchiness and localization enamoured the masses.[1] The success was noticed by a few business-oriented musicians that soon capitalized on the situation.[1] Industrialization of K-pop occurred around the mid 1990s and its popularity just continued to grow.[1] Maintaining localization while hybridizing (not assimilating) with Japan's idol methodology and American popular music stylings helped bolster success internally and as an export, albeit initially limited.[1] The promising external success in conjunction with the diverse extant musical acts drove the music industry to facilitate portfolio diversification of their performing groups to maximize success and profits. This meant optimized pandering to the most consumers. Such optimization lead to increasing numbers of performers per group, each individualized to suit different consumers’ tastes, perfecting the performances, and increasing attractiveness of the group to the different consuming cultures.[1] Therefore, in the group itself there could be a proverbial "good," "bad," cute, or sexy member, while the whole group increased in attractiveness.[1] Also, combining the desires of American culture for blatant sexiness,[11] Korean culture for aegyo (a compound of cute and lovable),[4] and Japanese proclivity for kawaii and patriarchal Lolita ideas made a complex interplay of diverse satisfaction of fantastical desires.[4][5] Following this logic, the music companies substantially invested monetarily and temporally in each performer in an effort to tailor them.[1] A base level of attractiveness and skill is required to be considered as a performer.[1] Years of subsequent training and discipline mold performers into what the public wants to see.[1] They are disallowed from dating to maintain innocence,[1] have a directed public life and persona and shamed for gaining weight or not keeping their appearance up. They may also be required to go through plastic surgery for beautification,[11] and are required to interact with fans in a desirable manner.[1] All-in-all, K-pop is an industry driven by profit; subsequently, it treats its performers like well-molded commodities in order to adhere to consumer desires, often sexual in nature as in the westernized male gaze, and Lolita ideals.

Femininity

As the flagship cultural commodities of South Korea, female K-pop singers are expected to be sexy, strong, and independent, in conjunction with being a product for the patriarchal South Korean capitalist society, which wants them to be submissive, innocent, cute, and lovable.[9] To maximize profit and success, the female stars must have the guise of ambiguity.[5] Ultimately, the ambiguity results as a clash between a virgin and a whore, which nearly all groups have. However, some of them may be more biased to one side than the other.[12] South Korean ideals nominally press an aegyo image, or one that is "attractive and desirable beyond limits of intimate relations," providing vulnerability to the idols but keeping them whimsical.[4] To conform to the westernized male gaze, females portray the part of an exotic sexual object,[9] often under the dollified Asian motif, leading to thoughts of "convenient Asians."[4] Dollification is a construct of placing sexual desire upon a submissive and uncorrupted object of beauty, something common to Asia due to traditional gender roles and patriarchal structure. This applies exceptionally well to the surgically beautified K-pop females.[4] Additionally, dolls are often associated with prostitution or sexual favors, something that idol singers can face when exploited by their employers.[4] Dollification also plays into the Japanese desire for submissive kawaii: dolls are inherently cute and can be controlled at will, something that quenches the yearning for totally submissive females.[4] Similarly, the concept of middle-aged Korean males seeing themselves as Samchon-fans (uncle-fans), or enduring uncles to the idols, has been argued as a facade to deny sexual desire when there is actually an underlying sexual gratification from the female bodies.[5] This makes the female idol fill a Lolita role, one which fulfills a market need by supplying a male pedophilic fantasy of a young female with unconscious sexuality.[5][7] Consequently, girl (female) bodies have become a commodity and given implicit subjugation in the patriarchal structure, the consumption of such is acceptable.[5] The females may present "girl power" given their high popularity status, but their pawn-like nature under their parent companies keeps this a novelty, not a reality, via pacification.[4][5] The justified objectification of girl bodies in such an idol republic, promoted economically and governmentally, makes it a Lolita republic, argued by Yeran Kim.[5] More simply, the beauty of their bodies can belong to a national collective.[6] This beauty and femininity in image is prominently described as that of long legs with "honey thighs", a perfect face and body, while showing ample skin. Breasts are often sexualized, but have only recently been presented as cleavage in K-pop due to the lack of cleavage shown in the general Korean culture.[9][6]

Masculinity

Paralleling female idols, male idols are also commodities to be sexualized in an effort to maximize profit and success. Given the rigorous patriarchal gender roles existing in Korea, the males are normally subjected to the requirement of Korean masculinity. However, to optimize for diverse target audiences, they often present vulnerabilities, forming a non-Korean masculinity.[8][13] Korean (hegemonic) masculinity can consist of patriarchal authority, traditional Confucian masculinity, and violence.[8][14] Contradictorily, non-Korean masculinity contains a range of metrosexuality from charming to chic.[8][13] This dichotomy forces bands to be muscular, potent, and appearing sexually virile, while injecting cuteness and innocence into their presentation. This creates a transnational "soft masculinity" and "global metrosexual masculinity."[8][13] Both a soft masculinity called "flower boys," and a harder masculinity, called "beast idols," appear in K-pop groups, but even the hardest K-pop masculinity maintains a globalized cuteness.[15] The key features of K-pop masculinity are muscular (often nude) torsos and cute actions/personalities.[6] Well-defined muscles, albeit a falsity, can be considered a sign of both individual phallic power in response to feministic movements and nationalistic female desires.[6] This is exemplified by a "body price" (momgap) notion that equates the sexiness of a male body to its (and his) worth,[6] with "chocolate abs" being the most desirable trait.[9][6] Emasculated actions/personalities are often subtly employed to diversify the K-pop masculine act,[6] as previously stated, but have occasionally been stressed by some to help break gender norms.[16] However, removing masculinity as a whole is ineffective. As noted by a Korean studies professor Oh Ingyu of Korea University, Seoul, "[a] male star without well-defined muscles, six-pack abs and a handsome smile won't go far."[12] Stated by Sarah Leung, "[the K-pop industry's] ultimate goal? To sell an image to the screaming girls in the crowd."[8]

Manifestation

Sexualization of the popular Korean music market takes place in many forms: pushing sexy and attractive performers, conforming the performers to fan fantasies, and presenting sexualized songs or music videos.[5]

Dollification

Dollification can be observed in a Japanese quote on the introduction to a performance by Girls’ Generation, "I was shocked by their amazingly beautiful legs, the dance was as if dolls were dancing and it was wondrous."[6] Likewise, employers utilized doll images for advertisement. The idol G.NA’s body measurements were a hot topic with fans, so her employer promoted her, by juxtaposing her with mannequins during photoshoots while calling her body "the mannequin body". This was due to her small face, large breasts, and tiny waist.[4] This representation of a dollified human parallels Girl's Generation's "Gee" music video, in which the members are acting as mannequins in a shop's window that soon come alive or Girl's Day’s music video for "Tilt my Head," in which the members act like doll factory automata producing self-similar dolls that magically come alive (both also following the "coming alive" narrative).[4] Countering the description of a perfect doll image is the group Piggy Dolls, consisting of three heavier set females, engendering diversity in body image.[4]

Female idol bodies

In general, female K-pop idols' bodies are heavily regulated by their employers with the expectation that they conform to certain image norms, and their bodies are heavily sexualized by fans. A member of the popular all male K-pop group, Super Junior, has stated in reference to Girls' Generation, a popular all female group, "[the members] can't get hurt without permission. Their bodies aren't their own. They're treasures of the nation."[6] The members of Girls’ Generation are known for their long legs, and as a result have been nicknamed "The Beautiful Legs Group" and a Japanese pornographic film has been made which focuses on their legs.[6] Bodily perfection is a requirement of the profit-driven entertainment industry, consequently, female idols are expected to be thin and beautiful. K-pop idols that are not thin enough are expected to lose weight. The three members of The Piggy Dolls, who were originally larger than most female K-pop idols, were put through training to lose a total of 56 kg for a comeback.[17][18] For K-pop trainees who's faces are not considered beautiful enough, their employer may enforce mandatory plastic surgery (with the exception of YG entertainment, which prohibits plastic surgery). Not getting a mandatory surgery can mean career failure.[19] Although any surgery is dangerous and can have complications,[20] it is very common for K-pop idols to have undergone small aesthetic plastic surgeries and moderately common to have undergone semi-reconstructive surgeries. Common modifications are a double-eyelid addition, rhinoplasty, chin shaving,[21] and muscular reshaping (mainly of the legs).[6] There are some idols who have openly admitted to aesthetic surgeries, such as Miryo of Brown Eyed Girls who had a double eyelid surgery, Goo Hara of KARA who had an eyelid alteration, and Jessi who had breast implants, rhinoplasty, and eyelid surgery.[22] Some even act as spokespeople for plastic surgery offices, such as G.Na who advertises the services of Dr. Jong Phil.[23] However, most artists keep enhancements private, so there is great conjecture of whether K-pop idols have had plastic surgery, including even the biggest names, such as members of Girls’ Generation[24] and Hyuna.[25] With so much conjecture, some K-pop artists, such as Lee Hyori and Jang Yoon-Ju, have even gone so far as to medically prove they have had no breast augmentation.[26] On the other hand, some artists openly embrace cosmetic surgery. The group Six Bomb has even made a song and music video called "Getting Pretty After" in reference to cosmetic surgery.[27] In fact, their manager, Kim Il-woong, has openly admitted that all the members have had surgical augmentations to their faces and breasts.[27] This candor, together with the idolization of K-pop artists, has influenced many young Korean's to desire plastic surgery in an effort to emulate their favorite stars.[23] South Korea has the most cosmetic surgeries per capita out of anywhere in the world.[6]

Male idol bodies

Males are likewise subjected to rigorous body standards, with a requirement to keep up their "body price"[6] while balancing their soft masculinity.[8][13] The singer Rain is the embodiment of effeminate hyper-masculinity.[28] His well-defined abs and upper muscular body, often seen naked and oiled (or wet), is contrasted to his cute and young face.[28] He is described as having "an angelic face and a killer body" or "a man's body with a boy's face."[28][29] Rain is an exemplary of the image required: shirtless, muscular male, with some grounding cute elements. To keep this image, rigorous training is required, normally employing trainers and intense daily workout routines.[6] As with their female counterparts, there is sometimes a need for plastic surgery. Similarly, conjecture exists for those who had undergone surgery, but again, some idols have explicitly stated their surgical augmentations. For example, Kwanghee of ZE:A had eyelid, nose, and forehead alterations, Kim Heechul from Super Junior had eyelid alterations and fixed remnants of a past broken nose with surgery, and his co-star Kyuhyun (of Super Junior) had a double eyelid surgery following his parents example.[22] It is important to note some of the gender norm challengers. Kim Heechul of Super Junior hosts a show "Lipstick Prince" to cover makeup for both genders, Ren from NU’EST modeled dresses, skirts, and other similar clothing, Lee Hong Ki of FTISLAND both wears and promotes his nail art, Jo Kwon is a queer culture advocate and crossdresser, and Hansol enjoys makeup and has admitted to being non-heterosexual.[16]

Sexualization in YouTube music videos

Given the popularization of K-pop through visual social media such as YouTube,[1] many fans would most recognize sexualization in music videos or recorded performances. The advent of music videos to help brand recognition brought a survival-of-the-fittest attitude to the images of the artists; that is, the sexier artists survived.[3] Therefore, sex was commercialized to capitalize on human reproductive nature, allowing sexualization to flourish.[3] Given the liberalization of sex, sexual content has increased in K-pop music videos. Therefore, a video content analysis was performed by Bohye Song, by taking MelOn Hot 100 chart listings of the most popular Korean music videos of 2004, 2005, 2014, and 2015 to analyze their sexual content and increases over time.[3] Content observed were sexual innuendos, sexual acts, and provocative clothing. The results were broken down into four parts of changes in physical affection, provocative dress, suggestiveness, and gender variance.[3] It was found that displayed physical affections did not change on average, but implicit sex increased, sexual suggestiveness increased, provocative clothing increased, and female lead singers showed a significant increase in provocative display.[3] This means that there is a significant increase in the display, mainly through clothing, of sexualized females and some males, but there is not much of an increase in sexual acts (two people in contact) depicted.[3] This can be exemplified with modern music videos. Examples of K-pop music videos with revealing clothing on a female singer include "Marionette" by Stellar, "Roll Deep" by Hyuna, "Ring My Bell" by Girl's Day, "Wild" by Nine Muses, "Wiggle Wiggle" by Hello Venus, "Like a Cat" by AOA, "Butt" by I-Ren, and "Dr. Feel Good" by BP RaNia, among many others.[30] The female singers sported short skirts, short shorts, cleavage, tight clothing...etc.[30] Correspondingly, male singers have worn see-through shirts and pants, extremely short shorts, and even corsets or skimpy dresses (in drag).[31] Complementary to these are banned-from-broadcast videos, which include, but are not limited to, "MOMMAE" by Jay Park, due to overtly sexualized females; "Abracadabra" by Brown Eyed Girls, for being sexually suggestive; "Mirotic" by TVXQ, for body exposure and explicit language; "One More" by FIESTAR, due to sexual imagery; both "Vibrato" and "Marionette" by Stellar, for sexually suggestive dancing and clothing; "Touch Me" by Ivy, for sexual imagery and suggestive lyrics; "Joker" by Dal Shabet, for sexual choreography; "Shower Later" by Gary, due to sexual innuendos and mature themes; and "Bae Bae" by BIGBANG, for sexual innuendos.[32] Lastly, the transition from innocent to sexualized can be shown by Girls’ Generation music videos.[11] Their video for "Gee" in 2009 maintained schoolgirl innocence, then their video for "Oh!" in 2010 kept their innocence, but added on a prelude to their dark side at the end when it pitted the innocent schoolgirl cheerleaders against sexier, shadowy versions of themselves.[11] Finally, their 2011 video for "The Boys" replaced innocence with mature sexiness.[11]

Controversies

One key controversy of the sexualization and exploitation of K-pop artists involves the disproportionate objectification of female artists in comparison to male artists.

Criticism for showing feminist behavior

Female Korean pop stars have faced strong criticism for expressing feminist opinions.[33] Female K-pop idols are expected to be cute and beautiful while being obedient to public reception. Even showing an interest in female empowerment is considered controversial. When K-pop stars have deviated and raised their voices have been publicly criticized and attacked.[34] For example, Sulli, who was known for being outspoken about feminism and women’s rights, was a rarity among K-pop’s tightly image-controlled stars. Because of this, the star endured years of online harassment and abuse which eventually pushed her into depression and suicide.[35]

Both male and female K-pop artists face sexualization and objectification; however, female K-pop artists seem to experience a disproportionate amount.[9] Women are subjected to the male gaze and being considered exotic and submissive for their fans.[9] Femininity is desired to coincide with the social structure so as to maximize profit; idols are normally forced into this definition in conjunction with Korea's inherently well-defined roll for women.

gollark: NOPE!
gollark: quine.
gollark: ```pythonimport sysprint(open(sys.argv[0]).read())```
gollark: ```pythonimport sysprint(sys.argv)```
gollark: ```phpPHP.```

References
  1. John, Lie (2014-11-24). K-pop : popular music, cultural amnesia, and economic innovation in South Korea. Oakland, California. ISBN 9780520958944. OCLC 893686334.
  2. Kim, Gooyong. "Korean Wave| Between Hybridity and Hegemony in K-Pop's Global Popularity: A Case of "Girls' Generation's" American Debut". International Journal of Communication. 11: 2367–2386.
  3. Song, Bohye (2016). Seeing is Believing: Content Analysis of Sexual Content in Korean Music Videos (PDF) (Masters). Southern Utah University.
  4. Puzar, Aljosa. "Asian Dolls and the Westernized Gaze: Notes on the Female Dollification in South Korea". Asian Women. 27 (2): 81–111.
  5. Kim, Yeran (December 2011). "Idol republic: the global emergence of girl industries and the commercialization of girl bodies". Journal of Gender Studies. 20 (4): 333–345. doi:10.1080/09589236.2011.617604. ISSN 0958-9236.
  6. Epstein, Stephen; Joo, Rachael M. "Multiple Exposures: Korean Bodies and the Transnational Imagination". The Asia-Pacific Journal. 10 (33).
  7. Gigi, Durham, Meenakshi (2009). The Lolita effect : the media sexualization of young girls and what we can do about it. Overlook Press. ISBN 9781590202159. OCLC 488932704.
  8. Leung, Sarah (2012). Catching the K-Pop Wave: Globality in the Production, Distribution, and Consumption of South Korean Popular Music (Batchlors). Vassar College.
  9. Lin, Xi; Rudolf, Robert (2017). "Does K-pop Reinforce Gender Inequalities? Empirical Evidence from a New Data Set". Asian Women. 33 (4): 27–54. doi:10.14431/aw.2017.12.33.4.27.
  10. Saeji, CedarBough T. (December 2013). "Juvenile Protection and Sexual Objectification: Analysis of the Performance Frame in Korean Music Television Broadcasts". Acta Koreana. 16 (2): 329–365. doi:10.18399/acta.2013.16.2.003. ISSN 1520-7412.
  11. Unger, Michael A. (March 2015). "The Aporia of Presentation: Deconstructing the Genre of K-pop Girl Group Music Videos in South Korea". Journal of Popular Music Studies. 27 (1): 25–47. doi:10.1111/jpms.12109. ISSN 1524-2226.
  12. Hazzan, Dave. "K-pop Chords of Sexism" (PDF). Herizons. 30 (2): 44–45.
  13. Sun., Jung (2011). Korean masculinities and transcultural consumption Yonsama, Rain, Oldboy, K-Pop idols. Hong Kong University Press. OCLC 840865016.
  14. Laurel., Kendall (2002). Under construction : the gendering of modernity, class, and consumption in the Republic of Korea. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0824824075. OCLC 46240370.
  15. Soyoung, Kim (October 22, 2013). "Men in K-Pop: From "Flower Boys" to "Beast-dols"". The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on March 25, 2017.
  16. heytoto (November 28, 2017). "8 K-Pop Idols Who Are Challenging Gender Norms In Korea". soompi.
  17. Gabrielle (September 9, 2013). "Piggy Dolls Are Making a Comeback: Why I'm Not Smiling". seoulbeats. Archived from the original on April 6, 2018.
  18. "Piggy Dolls". generasia. Archived from the original on March 29, 2018.
  19. Volodzko, David (April 25, 2016). "K-pop's Gross Double Standard for Women". Public Radio International. Archived from the original on September 8, 2017.
  20. Elfving-Hwang, Joanna (June 16, 2013). "Cosmetic Surgery and Embodying the Moral Self in South Korean Popular Makeover Culture". The Asia-Pacific Journal. 11 (24).
  21. Yuqing., Wang (2015). Behind South Korean cosmetic surgery : its historical causes and its intertwined relationship with Korean pop culture. ISBN 9781321989939. OCLC 934514703.
  22. "8 Idols Who've Discussed Their Plastic Surgery". SBS. March 28, 2018. Archived from the original on November 7, 2018.
  23. Stone, Zara (May 24, 2013). "The K-Pop Plastic Surgery Obsession". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on October 27, 2018.
  24. K., Sandy (April 6, 2016). "The Truth Behind K-pop SNSD Plastic Surgery". PlastyTalk.com. Archived from the original on December 3, 2017.
  25. "K-pop Female Idols Before and After Plastic Surgery". Ranker. Archived from the original on August 30, 2017.
  26. "Haters Accused These Female Idols Of Breast Implants…So They Proved Them Wrong". Koreaboo. March 16, 2018. Archived from the original on November 7, 2018.
  27. "K-Pop band Six Bomb 'celebrate' plastic surgery with before and after videos". BBC. March 17, 2017. Archived from the original on April 28, 2018.
  28. compilation, Kim, Youna, editor of (2013). The Korean wave : Korean media go global. Routledge. ISBN 9780415712781. OCLC 900162636.
  29. Shin, Hyunjoon (December 2009). "Have you ever seen theRain? And who'll stop theRain?: the globalizing project of Korean pop (K-pop)". Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. 10 (4): 507–523. doi:10.1080/14649370903166150. ISSN 1464-9373.
  30. "K-Pop idols' most revealing outfits [Female Edition]". allkpop. May 22, 2017. Archived from the original on January 14, 2018.
  31. "K-Pop idols' most revealing outfits [Male Edition]". allkpop. May 24, 2017. Archived from the original on January 15, 2018.
  32. "10 K-Pop MVs that have been banned for being "Too Sexual"". Koreaboo. January 6, 2017. Archived from the original on November 7, 2018.
  33. Herman, Tamar (26 March 2018). "Female K-Pop Stars Face Criticism for Seemingly Feminist Behavior". Billboard. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  34. "The woman who defied the world of K-pop". BBC News. 18 October 2019. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  35. Fain, M. K. (6 December 2019). "What is Killing K-Pop's Stars?". Medium.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.