Seton Pringle

Sidney Seton Pringle OBE (6 July 1879 – 11 November 1955) was an Irish surgeon.

Life

Pringle was born in Clones, County Monaghan, son of John Pringle; he was a first cousin of James Pringle KC, MP. Educated at Campbell College, Belfast, he entered the School of Physic in Trinity College, Dublin. He proved to be a brilliant student, winning a number of awards. He took his B.A. in 1902 and his M. B. and B. Ch. the following year. Two years later he became a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.[1]

He was appointed in 1904 to the surgical staff of Mercer's Hospital. During World War I, as a lieutenant in the RAMC, he worked in the Red Cross hospital in Dublin Castle, as well as other institutions.[1]

In 1918 he joined the Royal City of Dublin Hospital, Baggot St., where his reputation grew. Within the next few years he was appointed consultant to the Drumcondra Hospital, Rotunda Hospital and the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital.[1]

He was president of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland from 1934 to 1936.[1]

He served for many years with the St John Ambulance Brigade of Ireland; having joined before the outbreak of the war, he was promoted to District Superintendent, a rank he held before he left for war. He retired his position as District Surgeon of the St. John Ambulance in 1944. That same year he married Eileen Blandford of Dublin (1887–1978). Blandford joined the St. John Ambulance Brigade in 1913 and in 1914 became District Secretary, working closely with the founder and first commissioner of the Irish District, Dr. John Lumsden (later KBE). Both Blandford and her husband remained attached to the brigade after their marriage. The brigade in Ireland became independent of the brigade in the U.K. for constitutional reasons, during the summer of 1945, subsequently the Council of the St John Ambulance Brigade of Ireland was set up, with both Pringle and Blandford returning to a more active role in St John Ambulance to help oversee this transition.[2]

gollark: People *play the lottery*, too.
gollark: People somehow can't accept positive-sum games.
gollark: > A core proposition in economics is that voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. We show that people often deny the mutually beneficial nature of exchange, instead espousing the belief that one or both parties fail to benefit from the exchange. Across 4 studies (and 7 further studies in the Supplementary Materials), participants read about simple exchanges of goods and services, judging whether each party to the transaction was better off or worse off afterwards. These studies revealed that win–win denial is pervasive, with buyers consistently seen as less likely to benefit from transactions than sellers. Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and naïve realism (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society.
gollark: (linking because I happened to read it recently)
gollark: But look at this: https://psyarxiv.com/efs5y/

References
  1. Obituary, British Medical Journal, 26 November 1955, p. 1332
  2. St John Ambulance Ireland Historical Society


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.