Selective auditory attention

Selective auditory attention or selective hearing is a type of selective attention and involves the auditory system. Selective hearing is characterized as the action in which people focus their attention intentionally on a specific source of a sound or spoken words. When people use selective hearing, noise from the surrounding environment is heard by the auditory system but only certain parts of the auditory information are chosen to be processed by the brain.[1] Most often, auditory attention is directed at things people are most interested in hearing.[2] In an article by Krans, Isbell, Giuliano, and Neville (2013), selective auditory attention is defined as the ability to acknowledge some stimuli while ignoring other stimuli that is occurring at the same time. An example of this is a student focusing on a teacher giving a lesson and ignoring the sounds of classmates in a rowdy classroom (p. 53). This is an example of bottlenecking which means that information cannot be processed simultaneously so only some sensory information gets through the "bottleneck" and is processed. A brain simply cannot process all sensory information that is occurring in an environment so only the most relevant and important information is thoroughly processed by the brain.[3] There have been some models that theorize the pathway of selective auditory attention, notably the early selection model, late selection model, and attenuation model. Selective hearing is not a physiological disorder but rather it is the capability of humans to block out sounds and noise. It is the notion of ignoring certain things in the surrounding environment.

History

Early researches on selective auditory attention can be traced back to 1953, when Colin Cherry introduced the "cocktail party problem".[4] At the time, air traffic controllers at the control tower received messages from pilots through loudspeakers. Hearing mixed voices through a single loudspeaker made the task very difficult.[5] In Cherry's experiment, mimicking the problem faced by air traffic controllers, participants had to listen to two messages played simultaneously from one loudspeaker and repeat what they heard.[4] This was later termed the dichotic listening task.[6]

Though introduced by Colin Cherry, Donald Broadbent is often regarded as the first to systematically apply dichotic listening tests in his research.[7] Broadbent used the method of dichotic listening to test how participants selectively attend to stimuli when overloaded with auditory stimuli; Broadbent used his findings to develop the filter model of attention in 1958.[8] Broadbent theorized that the human information processing system has a "bottleneck" due to limited capacity and that the brain performs an "early selection" before processing auditory information.[9] Broadbent proposed that auditory information enters an unlimited sensory buffer and that one stream of information is filtered out and passes through the bottleneck to be cohesive, while all others that are not selected quickly decay in salience and are not processed.[10] Broadbent's model contradicts with the cocktail party phenomenon because Broadbent's model predicts that people would never respond to their names from unattended sources since unattended information is discarded before being processed.

Deutsch & Deutsch's late selection model that was proposed in 1963 is a competing model to Broadbent's early selection model.[11] Deutsch & Deutsch's model theorizes that all information and sensory input are attended to and processed for meaning.[11] Later in the processing routine, just before information enters the short-term memory, a filter analyzes the semantic characteristics of the information and lets stimuli containing relevant information pass through to short-term memory and removes irrelevant information. Deutsch & Deutsch's model for selective auditory attention suggests that weak response to unattended stimuli comes from an internal decision on informational relevance, where more important stimuli are prioritized to enter the working memory first.

In 1964, Anne Treisman, a graduate student of Broadbent, improved Broadent's theory and proposed her own attenuation model.[12] In Treisman's model, unattended information is attenuated, tuned down compared to attended information, but still processed. For example, imagine that you are exposed to three extraneous sources of sound in a coffee shop while ordering a drink (chatter, coffee brewer, music), Treisman's model indicates that you would still pick up on the latter three sounds while attending to the cashier, just that these extraneous sources of noise would be muffled as if their "volumes" were turned down. Treisman also suggests that a threshold mechanism exists in selective auditory attention in which words from the unattended stream of information can grab one's attention. Words of low threshold, higher level of meaning and importance, such as one's name and "watch out", redirects one's attention to where it is urgently required.[12]

Recent research

Recently, researchers have attempted to explain mechanisms implicated in selective auditory attention. In 2012, an assistant professor in residence of the Neurological Surgery and Physiology in the University of California San Francisco examined the selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multiple-talker speech perception. Edward Chang and his colleague, Nima Mesgarani undertook a study that recruited three patients affected by severe epilepsy, who were undergoing treatment surgery.[13] All patients were recorded to have normal hearing. The procedure of this study required the surgeons to place a thin sheet of electrodes under the skull on the outer surface of the cortex. The activity of electrodes was recorded in the auditory cortex. The patients were given two speech samples to listen to and they were told to distinguish the words spoken by the speakers. The speech samples were simultaneously played and different speech phrases were spoken by different speakers. Chang and Mesgarani found an increase in neural responses in the auditory cortex when the patients heard words from the target speaker. Chang went on to explain that the method of this experiment was well-conducted as it was able to observe the neural patterns that tells when the patient's auditory attention shifted to the other speaker. This clearly shows the selectivity of auditory attention in humans.

The development of selective attention has also been examined. Jones and Moore for instance, studied how well children across various age groups could hear and respond to a target sound when it was masked by other auditory stimuli. They discovered that 9– to 11-year-old children became as adept as adults at paying attention only to the target sound and filtering out the masking sound (2015, p. 366). This shows that research on selective auditory information is important to continue as it allows us to better understand our world.[14]

Prevalence

The prevalence of selective hearing has not been clearly researched yet. However, there are some that have argued that the proportion of selective hearing is particularly higher in males than females. Ida Zündorf, Hans-Otto Karnath and Jörg Lewald carried out a study in 2010 which investigated the advantages and abilities males have in the localization of auditory information.[15] A sound localization task centered on the cocktail party effect was utilized in their study. The male and female participants had to try to pick out sounds from a specific source, on top of other competing sounds from other sources. The results showed that the males had a better performance overall. Female participants found it more difficult to locate target sounds in a multiple-source environment. Zündorf et al. suggested that there may be sex differences in the attention processes that helped locate the target sound from a multiple-source auditory field. While men and women do have some differences when it comes to selective auditory hearing, they both struggle when presented with the challenge of multitasking, especially when tasks that are to be attempted concurrently are very similar in nature (Dittrich, and Stahl, 2012, p. 626).[16]

Disorder status

Selective hearing is not known to be a disorder of the physiological or psychological aspect. Under the World Health Organization (WHO), a hearing disorder happens when there is a complete loss of hearing in the ears. It means the loss of the ability to hear. Technically speaking, selective hearing is not "deafness" to a certain sound message. Rather, it is the selectivity of an individual to attend audibly to a sound message. The whole sound message is physically heard by the ear but the brain systematically filters out unwanted information to focus on relevant important portions of the message. Therefore, selective hearing should not be confused as a physiological hearing disorder.[17] Selective auditory attention is a normal sensory process of the brain, and there can be abnormalities related to this process in people with sensory processing disorders such as attention deficit hyperactive disorder,[18] post traumatic stress disorder,[19] schizophrenia,[20] selective mutism,[21] and in stand-alone auditory processing disorders.[22]

gollark: You *will* have an event. it is mandatory.
gollark: µhahahaha.
gollark: ?remind 1h15m miss it
gollark: Wait, someone is presenting heavlisp?
gollark: An unknown network error has occurred.

See also

References
  1. Acoustical Society of America (2012). "Scientists tuning in to how you tune out noise". ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 17, 2012.
  2. Bess FH, Humes L (2008). Audiology: The Fundamentals. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Karns CM, Isbell E, Giuliano RJ, Neville HJ (June 2015). "Auditory attention in childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study of spatial selective attention to one of two simultaneous stories". Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 13: 53–67. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.03.001. PMC 4470421. PMID 26002721.
  4. Cherry C (5 May 1953). "Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears" (PDF).
  5. Kantowitz BH, Sorkin RD (1983). Human factors : understanding people-system relationships. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-09594-X. OCLC 8866672.
  6. Revlin R (2013). Cognition : theory and practice. New York, NY: Worth Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7167-5667-5. OCLC 793099349.
  7. Hugdahl K (2015). "Dichotic Listening and Language: Overview". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier. pp. 357–367. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.54030-6. ISBN 978-0-08-097087-5.
  8. Moray N (1995). "Donald E. Broadbent: 1926-1993". The American Journal of Psychology. 108 (1): 117–21. PMID 7733412.
  9. Goldstein S, Naglieri JA. Handbook of Executive Functioning. New York, NY. ISBN 978-1-4614-8106-5. OCLC 866899923.
  10. Broadbent DE. Perception and communication. Oxford, England. ISBN 978-1-4832-2582-1. OCLC 899000591.
  11. Deutsch JA, Deutsch D (January 1963). "Some theoretical considerations". Psychological Review. 70: 80–90. doi:10.1037/h0039515. PMID 14027390.
  12. Treisman AM (May 1969). "Strategies and models of selective attention". Psychological Review. 76 (3): 282–99. doi:10.1037/h0027242. PMID 4893203.
  13. Mesgarani N, Chang EF (May 2012). "Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception". Nature. 485 (7397): 233–6. Bibcode:2012Natur.485..233M. doi:10.1038/nature11020. PMC 3870007. PMID 22522927.
  14. Moore DR (2015). "Development of auditory selective attention: Why children struggle to hear in noisy environments". Developmental Psychology. 51 (3): 353–369. doi:10.1037/a0038570.supp. PMID 25706591.
  15. Zündorf IC, Karnath HO, Lewald J (June 2011). "Male advantage in sound localization at cocktail parties". Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 47 (6): 741–9. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.08.002. PMID 20828679. S2CID 206983792.
  16. Dittrich K, Stahl C (June 2012). "Selective impairment of auditory selective attention under concurrent cognitive load". Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 38 (3): 618–27. doi:10.1037/a0024978. PMID 21928926.
  17. "Deafness and hearing impairment". World Health Organization. WHO. 2012.
  18. Vlcek P, Bob P, Raboch J (2014-07-14). "Sensory disturbances, inhibitory deficits, and the P50 wave in schizophrenia". Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 10: 1309–15. doi:10.2147/ndt.s64219. PMC 4106969. PMID 25075189.
  19. Javanbakht A, Liberzon I, Amirsadri A, Gjini K, Boutros NN (October 2011). "Event-related potential studies of post-traumatic stress disorder: a critical review and synthesis". Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders. 1 (1): 5. doi:10.1186/2045-5380-1-5. PMC 3377169. PMID 22738160.
  20. Vlcek P, Bob P, Raboch J (2014-07-14). "Sensory disturbances, inhibitory deficits, and the P50 wave in schizophrenia". Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 10: 1309–15. doi:10.2147/ndt.s64219. PMC 4106969. PMID 25075189.
  21. Arie, Miri; Henkin, Yael; Lamy, Dominique; Tetin-Schneider, Simona; Apter, Alan; Sadeh, Avi; Bar-Haim, Yair (February 1, 2007). "Reduced Auditory Processing Capacity During Vocalization in Children With Selective Mutism". Biological Psychiatry. 61 (3): 419–421. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.020. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  22. American Academy of Audiology. "Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory" (PDF). Retrieved 16 January 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.