Scirtothrips dorsalis

The chilli thrips[derivation 1] or yellow tea thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood, is an extremely successful invasive species of pest-thrips[1] which has expanded rapidly from Asia over the last twenty years, and is gradually achieving a global distribution. It has most recently been reported in St. Vincent (2004) Florida (2005), Texas (2006), and Puerto Rico (2007). It is a pest of economic significance with a broad host range, with prominent pest reports on crops including pepper, mango, citrus, strawberry, grapes, cotton, tea, peanuts, blueberry, and roses.[2] Chilli thrips appear to feed preferentially on new growth, and infested plants usually develop characteristic wrinkled leaves, with distinctive brown scarring along the veins of leaves, the buds of flowers, and the calyx of fruit. Feeding damage can reduce the sale value of crops produced, and in sufficient numbers, kill plants already aggravated by environmental stress. This thrips has also been implicated in the transmission of three tospoviruses, but there is some controversy over its efficiency as a vector.[3]

Scirtothrips dorsalis
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Thysanoptera
Family:
Thripidae
Subfamily:
Thripinae
Genus:
Scirtothrips
Species:
S. dorsalis
Binomial name
Scirtothrips dorsalis
Hood, 1919
Synonyms
  • Heliothrips minutissimus Bagnall, 1919
  • Anaphothrips andreae Karny, 1925
  • Neophysopus fragariae Girault, 1927
  • Scirtothrips padmae Ramakrishna, 1942

This thrips has a rapid life cycle, and can develop from egg to adult in slightly less than two weeks under optimal weather conditions.

Identification

A tentative (but inconclusive) field identification can be made of this thrips by searching for the following traits under low power magnification: small size (under a millimeter in length), yellow coloration, dark antennae, and dark striping on the lower abdomen.[4][5][6]

It can be specifically identified and confirmed through the presence of forked sense cones on antennal segments III and IV, antennomeres I-II are pale and III to IX are dark; there are three discal setae on the lateral margins of abdominal tergites, with pronotal posteromarginal seta II nearly one and a half times the length of I or III, a complete posteromarginal comb on tergite VII; and three ocellar setae with III between posterior ocelli.[4][7][8]

Recent research concludes that S. dorsalis does represent a species complex of three or more disparate species who are morphologically similar but genetically distinct.[9][10]

Biology

Like all thrips of suborder Terebrantia, S. dorsalis undergoes two nymphal stages followed by two "false" pupal stages,[11] and under optimal conditions, this thrips may reach adulthood in approximately two weeks.[12] However, research has shown that the length of these life-history stages are flexible within a group depending on an individual's access to nutrients[13] and temperature.[12] Nymphs entering the metamorphic process drop off of the plant during the first of two propual stages, and then complete their development in loose soil or leaf litter at the base of their host - but have been observed to pupate in any dark and humid crevice low on the plant, including bark and the folds of tightly packed lower leaves[14] or flowers. The pupal process can range from two days to a full week.[12] In temperate regions where the temperature falls below the critical lower threshold, non-diapausing adults are reported to overwinter in the soil or apical buds.[15][16][17] Colder temperatures may even drive pupation, but this has not been experimentally confirmed.

Post-emergence, females have a pre-oviposition period of one to two days.[12] Using their ovipositor, females lay single eggs within the plant tissue,[18] and may lay an average of forty eggs during their lifetime.[12] Females of S. dorsalis prefer to lay their eggs inside of young leaves and buds at the apical meristem of plants, but as populations increase, will lay their eggs within the surface of mature leaves.[11][19] Depending on temperature, eggs may gestate for one to three weeks.[12] After hatching, larvae will migrate from older leaves to the newer growth at terminals.[20] Like many thrips, S. dorsalis appears to prefer feeding on new growth and young plants,[6][11][15] and is often found on the newer top leaves on smaller plants, although individual plant morphology and chemistry may result in some distributional differences.[15]

Nymph populations will continue to increase so long as new shoots are allowed to grow,[21] and adults are permitted to land.[22] Physically manipulating the host by removing preferred feeding sites has been shown to reduce thrips density on the plant, but also to increase the relative rate of between-plot dispersal.[21][23]

History of Expansion

Molecular evidence currently suggests that the point of biogeographical origin for the thrips is in Southeast Asia or on the Indian subcontinent,[10] the original host remains unknown. Chili peppers did not arrive in India until the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with Portuguese traders,[24] so the host upon which S. dorsalis was first described cannot be the point of origin. Given S. dorsalis’ broad polyphagy and long history of pestilent behavior, it has been speculated that a weed such as castor that was adopted for agriculture may have been one of several hosts of origin, and that the thrips adapted and began to exploit other hosts as they became available in the changing agricultural landscape.

It spread rapidly throughout the contiguous region of southeastern Asia fairly early, and there are many historical instances of these thrips attacking key crops on a regular basis. In India, it has been described as a pest of castor,[19] pepper,[25] cotton,[26] tea,[11][27] mango, and peanut.[28] Outside of India, it has been reported as pest in China on tea and fruits like litchi,[29] in Taiwan on citrus and vegetable,[30] on citrus and tea in Japan,[17][31] many vegetable and fruit crops in Thailand,[32] peppers and mango in Vietnam, and even seasonally on the Korean peninsula.[33]

Under the pressures of globalization and trade, this thrips has continued to expand its range,[1] and in 1997 EPPO[34] recognized this pest as one with significant potential for global expansion. By that point it had already become fairly established beyond its precinctive range, had been intercepted at South African ports in 1986,[35] noted as a pest in Kenya by 1997,[36] and infesting cotton in Côte d'Ivoire by 1999.[37] It has been described as a pest in Australia on cashew in 1998,[38] and on strawberry and tea only a few years later.[8][39]

It was only a matter of time before S. dorsalis was intercepted in the United States and the Caribbean region. While the thrips had been reported from port interceptions in Florida in 1995 and in Texas in 2000, surveys failed to detect any established populations or other sightings of the thrips.[40][41] However, interceptions of this insect at a Miami port under the calyces of pepper from St. Vincent in 2003[40] inspired the USDA to act in order to predict and prevent the pest's arrival.[42] APHIS and the University of Florida responded with investigations of islands in the Caribbean.[5][6] They found the pest already distributed throughout the Caribbean, and speculated that it had almost certainly already spread throughout South and Central America.[43]

In late 2005, S. dorsalis was reported as a significant pest on Palm Beach County ornamental roses, and reports from other counties on the Knock Out cultivar of rose and pepper rapidly followed thereafter.[41] By January 2007, the thrips had been found in more than thirty counties from Alachua to Monroe, and has been detected in southern Georgia.[44] It has been spotted several times on retail roses in south Texas, and anecdotal evidence suggests that the expansion into Texas counties is probably underreported. Models of climatological and host potential suggest that this thrips has the potential to expand its range to cover much of the southeast, the gulf coast region, and the western seaboard.[45][46]

Impact

The characteristic feeding damage of S. dorsalis was recognized as "Murda disease"[47][48] on chili long before the thrips was associated with and then determined to be the cause of the blight. Prolonged feeding by thrips curls tender leaves and buds, and will turn fruits and flowers from bronze to black in color, rendering the plant material unmarketable. Even slightly damaged or scarred vegetables or inflorescences are often viewed as unmarketable, and these damaged commodities will fetch a lower price, reducing a grower's return on their investment. Insects feeding in new growth limits and stunts overall plant growth, and may induce abortion of fruit.[36] When thrips feed in high enough densities, or in sufficiently dry climates, this process results in the eventual desiccation and death of their host plant. Even low densities of thrips can contribute to the decline in fruit production and plant health, especially during times of drought.[49][50]

S. dorsalis has been implicated in the transmission of several separate tospoviruses,[3] but recent experiments have cast some doubt on the efficiency at which S. dorsalis actually transmits the virus to its hosts. It may be a member of a class described in a near relative, Thrips palmi Karny: an infected non-transmitter with detectable levels of virus.[51]

Control

Chilli thrips are known to develop resistance to pesticides extremely quickly . This is thought to be a consequence of the short timespan and large capacity of their reproductive cycle, drawing comparisons to spider mites. In addition, they have an extremely wide host range, providing population reservoirs even after the most thorough pesticide application.

Only the insecticides spinosyn and abamectin are known to be effective against this pest. Neem based products are considered effective synergists. Product rotation is integral to resistance prevention programs. Insecticidal soaps and horticultural oils are both effective, but only in very frequent, sometimes impractical spray schedules (at least once a week). Systemic neonicotinoids such as imidacloprid were once considered to be sparing of beneficial insects and natural predators, and recommended for integrated pest management of chilli thrips, especially when used as a soil soak or drip irrigation product. The past decade has revealed that neonicotinoids can seriously impact beneficial insects, especially bees, through effects that are not immediately apparent - even at trace concentrations.

Entomopathogenic fungi are an emerging control method being used against a variety of insects, including chilli thrips. Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium spp. have both attracted research for this use. Multiple such products are available for use in Asian countries. Only one Beauveria bassiana product is registered as an insecticide in the United States. Tests of these products show that they are mediocre control agents, but may be useful in rotation with other insecticides or in combination with spray oils. Unfortunately, these agents are broad spectrum insecticides, and do not spare natural predators or desirable insects such as bees and butterflies.

Footnotes
  1. This is the more common international spelling of "chilli" outside of the United States. This spelling has been preserved in the common name for the insect by entomologists in the United States in deference to the body of literature already published for this species by international authors.
gollark: Use uxterm?
gollark: Protocol μ is to be initiated.
gollark: <@319753218592866315> Consume apioforms.
gollark: Did palaiologos do apiocity?
gollark: What happened?

References
  1. Morse, JG; Hoddle, MS (2005). Invasion biology of thrips. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 67 – 89.
  2. University of Florida webpage on Chilli thrips
  3. Whitfield AE, Ullman DE, German TL (2005). Tospovirus-thrips interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 43: 459–89.
  4. Skarlinsky, T. 2004. Identification Aid for Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood, 1919, pp. 6. In USDA [ed.]. unpublished.
  5. Seal, D; Ciomperlik, MA (2004). Surveys of St. Lucia and St. Vincent for Scirtothrips dorsalis (Hood), Jan. 14-23, 2004. USDA APHIS PPQ, Technical Report. 19 pp.
  6. Seal, D; Ciomperlik, MA; Richards, ML; Klassen, W (2006). Distribution of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in pepper fields and on pepper plants in St. Vincent. Florida Entomologist 89: 311 – 320.
  7. Mound, L. A., and J. M. Palmer. 1981. Identification, distribution and host-plants of the pest species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 71: 467–479.
  8. Hoddle, M. S., and L. A. Mound. 2003. The genus Scirtothips in Australia (Insecta, Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Zootaxa 268: 1 - 40.
  9. Hoddle, M. S., J. M. Heraty, P. F. Rugman-Jones, L. A. Mound, and R. Stouthamer. 2008. Relationships Among Species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae, Thripinae) Using Molecular and Morphological Data. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101: 491 – 500.
  10. Dickey AM, Kumar V, Hoddle MS, Funderburk JE, Morgan JK, Jara-Cavieres A. 2015. "The Scirtothrips dorsalis Species Complex: Endemism and Invasion in a Global Pest." PLoS ONE. 10(4): e0123747. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123747
  11. Dev, H. N. 1964. Preliminary studies on the biology of the Assam thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood, on tea. Indian Journal of Entomology 26: 184–194.
  12. Tatara, A. 1994. Effect of temperature and host plant on the development, fertility, and longevity of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 29: 31 - 37.
  13. Mound, L. A. 2005. Thysanoptera: diversity and interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 50: 247–269.
  14. Okada, T., M. Otaishi, and T. Kaneko. 1981. Diurnal change in activity of adults of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 48: 44 - 46.
  15. Shibao, M., F. Tanaka, and F. Nakasuji. 1990. Seasonal changes and infestation sites of the chillie thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on grapes. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 34: 145–152.
  16. Okada, T., and I. Kudo. 1982. Overwintering sites and stages of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Tea fields. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 26: 177–182.
  17. Okada, T., and I. Kudo. 1982. Relative abundance and phenology of Thysanoptera in a Tea field. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 26.
  18. Lewis, T. 1973. Thrips. Their biology, ecology and economic importance. Academic Press, London, GB.
  19. Raizada, U. 1965. Life history of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood with detailed external morphology of the immature stage. Bulletin of Entomology 6: 30 - 49.
  20. Onkarappa, S., and B. Mallik. 1998. Distribution and management of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on rose, pp. 165–167. In P. P. Reddy, N. K. Kumar and A. Verghese [eds.], Advances in IPM for horticultural crops. Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, India.
  21. Shibao, M., F. Tanaka, K. Fujisaki, and F. Nakasuji. 1993. Effects of lateral shoot cutting on population density of the chillie Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on Grape. Applied Entomology and Zoology 28: 35 - 41.
  22. Shibao, M. 1996. Effects of a Vinyl Film Cover on the Population Density of the Chillie Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), on Grape. Applied Entomology and Zoology 31: 174–177.
  23. Shibao, M. 1997. Effects of Resource Availability on Population Density of the Chillie Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), on Grape. Applied Entomology and Zoology 32: 413–415.
  24. Collingham, E. 2006. Curry: A Tale of Cooks and Conquerors. Oxford University Press.
  25. Varadharajan, S., and R. Veeravel. 1995. Population dynamics of chilli thrips Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood in Annamalainagar. Indian Journal of Ecology 22: 27 - 30.
  26. Panickar, B. K., and J. R. Patel. 2001. Population dynamics of different species of thrips on chilli, cotton, and pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Entomology 63: 170–175.
  27. Mukhopadhyay, A., S. Sannigrahi, and G. Biswas. 1997. Colonization and utilization of young tea plants by some insects and mites in Darjeeling foothills. Ecology and evolution of plant-feeding insects in natural and man-made environments.: 59 69.
  28. Wheatley, A. R. D., J. A. Wightman, J. H. Williams, and S. J. Wheatley. 1989. The influence of drought stress on the distribution of insect on four groundnut genotypes grown near Hyderabad, India. Bulletin of Entomological Research 79: 567–578.
  29. Li, J.-M., G.-W. Liu, and R.-B. Peng. 2004. Bionomics and control of the yellow tea thrips, Scirothrips dorsalis infesting litchi. Entomological Knowledge 41: 172–173.
  30. Chang, N. T. 1995. Major pest thrips in Taiwan, pp. 105–108. In B. L. Parker, M. Skinner and T. Lewis [eds.], Thrips Biology and Management. Plenum Press, New York.
  31. Tatara, A., and K. Furuhashi. 1992. Analytical Study on Damage to Satsuma Mandarin Fruit by Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera : Thripidae), with Particular Reference to Pest Density. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 36: 217–223.
  32. Bansiddhi, K., and S. Poonchaisri. 1995. Thrips of vegetables in Thailand, pp. 109–110. In B. L. Parker, M. Skinner and T. Lewis [eds.], Thrips Biology and Management. Plenum Press, New York.
  33. Lee, G.-S., J.-H. Lee, S.-H. Kang, and K.-S. Woo. 2001. Thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in winter season and their vernal activities on Jeju Island, Korea. . Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 4: 115–122.
  34. EPPO. 1997. Scirtothrips dorsalis, pp. 1425. In I. M. Smith, D. G. McNamara, P. R. Scott and M. Holderness [eds.], Quarantine Pests for Europe, 2nd Edition. CABI/EPPO, Wallingford.
  35. Gilbert, M. J. 1986. First African record of Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) a potential pest of citrus and other crops in southern Africa. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 49: 159–161.
  36. Lewis, T. 1997. Thrips as crop pests. CAB International, Oxon, GB.
  37. Bournier, J.-P. 1999. Deux Thysanoptères, nouveaux déprédateurs du cotonnier en Côte d'Ivoire. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 35: 275-281.
  38. Peng, R. K., K. Christian, and K. Gibb. 2004. Implementing ant technology in commercial cashew plantations and continuation of transplanted green ant colony monitoring, pp. 1 - 42. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia.
  39. Chin, D., H. Brown, M. Neal, and B. M. Thistleton. 2007. Mango flower insects and their effect on fruit quality in the Northern Territory, pp. 25 - 33. In P. Industries [ed.].
  40. Skarlinsky, T. L. 2003. Survey of St. Vincent pepper fields for Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood, pp. 5. USDA-APHIS-PPQ, Miami, Florida.
  41. Silagyi, A. J., and W. N. Dixon. 2006. Assessment of Chili thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood, pp. 9. Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida.
  42. Meissner, H., A. Lemay, D. Borchert, B. Nietschke, A. Neeley, R. Magarey, M. Ciomperlik, C. Brodel, and T. Dobbs. 2005. Evaluation of Possible Pathways of Introduction for Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) from the Caribbean into the Continental United States, pp. 125. In USDA [ed.]. Plant Epidemiology and Risk Assessment Laboratory, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  43. Klassen, W., D. R. Seal, M. A. Ciomperlik, and D. A. Fieslemnann. 2008. The chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis: current status in the greater Caribbean region. Proceedings of the Caribbean Food Crops Society 44.
  44. Diffie, S., G. B. Edwards, and L. A. Mound. 2008. Thysanoptera of Southeastern U.S.A.: A checklist for Florida and Georgia. Zootaxa 1787: 45 – 62.
  45. Venette, R. C., and E. E. Davis. 2004. Chilli thrips/ yellow tea thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Mini Pest Risk Assessment. University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
  46. Nietschke, B. S., D. M. Borchert, R. D. Magarey, and M. A. Ciomperlik. 2008. Climatological potential for Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) establishment in the United States. Florida Entomologist 91: 79 - 86.
  47. Kulkarni, G. S. 1922. The "Murda" disease of chilli (Capsicum). Agricultural Journal of India 22: 51 - 54.
  48. Ramakrishna Ayyar, T. V. 1932. Bionomics of some thrips injurious to cultivated plants in South India. Agriculture and Livestock of India 2: 391–403.
  49. Kolb, T. E., L. H. McCormick, and D. L. Shumway. 1991. Physiological responses of pear thrips-damaged sugar maples to light and water stress. Tree Physiology 9: 401–413.
  50. Fournier, F., G. Bovin, and R. K. Stewart. 1995. Effect of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on yellow onion yields and economic thresholds for its management. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 1401–1407.
  51. Nagata, T., A. K. Inoue-Nagata, J. C. van Lenteren, R. Goldbach, and D. Peters. 2002. Factors determining vector competence and specificity for transmission of Tomato spotted wilt virus. Journal of General Virology 83: 663–671.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.