School climate

School climate refers to the quality and character of school life. It has been described as "the heart and soul of the school ... that essence of a school that leads a child, a teacher, and an administrator to love the school and to look forward to being there each school day."[1] A positive school climate helps people feel socially, emotionally and physically safe in schools. It includes students', parents' and school personnel's norms, beliefs, relationships, teaching and learning practices, as well as organizational and structural features of the school.[2] According to the National School Climate Council,[3] a sustainable, positive school climate promotes students' academic and social development.

Many factors can affect the quality and character of school life. There is no consensus on the definition or dimensions of school climate.[4] However, the factors that shape school climate are often grouped into four main dimensions. These dimensions are: safety, teaching and learning (academic climate), relationships (community climate), and the environment.[4] Each dimension is discussed in detail below.

Positive school climate is related to many positive student outcomes. For example, positive school climate is associated to higher academic performance, better mental health, and less bullying.[5] Improving school climate can be used as a preventative approach to reduce disruptive behavior and improve attendance, achievement, and student and parent satisfaction with school.[4] Many assessment tools and interventions have therefore been developed to help school in the climate improve process.

Dimensions

Safety

All humans need to feel safe socially, mentally, and physically.[6] Feeling safe in school influences students' learning and their general development.[7] However, many students do not feel safe in schools. Most students are not necessarily exposed to physical violence, but many students are exposed to social, emotional, and intellectual violence.[7] A positive school climates therefore means feeling physically and emotional safe, and having clear and consistent rules to maintain order and discipline.[4]

  • Physical Safety is the degree to which violence, aggression, and physical bullying are present. It also refers to the strategies used to eliminate violence (e.g., security guards and metal detectors).
  • Identity Safety pertains to a humans titi being an asset in the classroom rather than a barrier. This refers to how a school can promote positive relationships and opportunities to learn where students feel they are welcomed, supported and valued as a member of the learning community.[8]
  • Emotional Safety includes available school-based mental-health services (e.g. counseling services, caring and supportive staff), an absence of verbal bullying, and positive attitudes about individual differences. It is also affected by the students' and staff's attitudes about bullying and their response to it.
  • Order and discipline refers to how often students break the school's rules, and how misbehavior is handled. Schools with a positive climate have low rates of delinquency and clearly communicated rules that students consider to be implemented fairly and consistently.

Academic climate

Academic climate refers to the teaching and learning practices promoted in the school. It is composed of three factors: leadership, teaching and learning, and professional development.[4]

  • Leadership refers to the role of the principal and administration. It is influenced by how well they communicate their vision for the school and how supportive and accessible they are.
  • Teaching and learning refers to the actual methods and instructional practices used by teachers in their classrooms. It entails everything from the curriculum selected, evaluation methods, to how teachers communicate their expectations and give feedback to students. These practices influence student motivation and engagement in the classroom, which in turn affect academic performance.
  • Professional development refers to teacher's access to training programs they find relevant and helpful, and that are in line with the needs of the school. In schools with a positive climate, teachers have ongoing access to training where they can learn new strategies to improve the way they teach.

Community

The quality of relationships between members of a school (teachers, students, and administrators) has an influence on students' behavior and achievement. The relationship between a student and their teacher affects their engagement in the classroom, self-esteem, and grades. The community aspect of school climate refers to the quality of relationships within a school. It also includes the school's connectedness, respect for diversity, and partnerships with other members of the community.[4]

  • Relationships refers the quality and consistency of relationships among students, staff members, and between teachers and students. School climate is affected by how much students and teachers support, trust, respect, and care for each other. The relationships between the adults in a school (e.g. teachers and principals) also has an important influence on school climate.
  • Connectedness refers to students' feelings of attachment and belonging towards the school. Feeling accepted and included by the other members of the school will contribute to a positive school climate.
  • Respect for diversity refers to treating members of any ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or religious affiliation equally. It also means cultivating awareness and appreciation for other cultures in classrooms.
  • Community partnership refers to the involvement of parents and other community members in school life. It involves good communication between parents and school staff, high attendance of school events, the development of mentoring programs, and other initiatives that build relationships between students and the larger community.

Institutional environment

The physical layout, size, and material resources of a school also affect school climate. For instance, environmental variables such as classroom layout and activity schedules can influence how safe students feel and how well they perform in school. Environmental variables include the adequacy of the school setting, the maintenance and infrastructure of the building, and the accessibility and allocation of educational resources.[4]

  • Environmental adequacy refers to the physical characteristics of the school, such as cleanliness, lighting and temperature, and sound control, which all affect teaching and learning.
  • Structural organization is the physical layout of the school itself (size, classroom size, number of unsupervised areas). It also includes organizational aspects, such as start and end times, and whether students are grouped based on ability. These characteristics can influence both feelings of safety and academic performance.
  • Availability of resources refers to how much access students and teachers have to equipment, materials, and supplies that improve teaching (e.g., technology, tools, or books).

Theoretical frameworks

There are several theories of school climate described in the research literature. They are ordered based on the scientific research that has supported them.

Bio-ecological theory

Bronfenbrenner's (1979) bio-ecological framework[9] suggests that human development occurs through the complex, reciprocal interactions that an individual has with others and the surrounding environment. This theory outlines four systems of operations including a microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem and macrosystem, where the self is microsystem and school is part of the mesosystem.[10] It proposes that individuals have ultimate control over their own environments, altering and modifying to their needs, however, this is only possible through self-directed actions that combine biological and environmental attributes. One cannot engage in reconstructing their environment without both of these attributes working together.[11] More depth of this concept can be referenced in the bioecological model. In the context of school climate, individual behaviors are shaped by the school environment, in which each child is embedded. For example, the structure and condition of the school, the use of specific school practices (e.g., disciplinary), and the interpersonal relationships between students and teachers, all play a role in influencing student development.[4]

Risk and resilience perspective

The focus of this model is on identifying protective factors in a child's environment (e.g., supportive relationships) that promote healthy adjustment and reduce negative outcomes, despite the presence of risk.[12][13] A risk factor refers to anything that increases a child's likelihood of experiencing a negative outcome in the future. For example, growing up in poverty is considered a risk factor. Children are considered resilient if they can rely on positive conditions or attributes (e.g., supportive relationships with teachers, academically challenging instruction) to buffer the negative effects of adversity.[14][15] Psychological resilience has been studied since the 1970s and continues to grow in research.

Social cognitive theory

Environmental factors affect how students view themselves as active learners within the classroom.[16] School climate plays a role in student development through the quality of interactions with others. For example, setting appropriate academic expectations, promoting supportive teacher-student relationships, and creating a safe and secure environment where students' feel comfortable taking academic risks, all play a role in student development.[4] Research has shown that people have the natural tendency to affiliate with others. Therefore, students living in a cooperative, helpful class are more likely to feel identity safe as they develop a sense of belonging and contribute to their class community. When students cooperate, it is evident that their learning is increased, and they develop a positive attachment to school. This capacity to work together has been a hallmark of humanity and the basis for building a civil society.[8]

Stage-environment fit theory

According to this theory, behavior, emotions, and thoughts are influenced by personal characteristics and the surrounding environment.[17][18] In the context of school climate, the fit between students' psychological needs and the school environment plays a role in students' motivation for academic success.[19][20] Because of the social nature of learning, the social identities of the teacher and each of the students is important and influences every interaction in the classroom. Students are affected behaviorally and emotionally by every encounter they have in the classroom. Humans have the tendency to conform to others. For example, if the teacher of a classroom has a confident and intelligent persona then the students are more likely to portray these same characteristics in the classroom.[8] Adults from non-Western cultures often identify children's attention to and ability to copy adults actions as a social learning strategy and a sign of intelligence.[21] When this external motivation to conform to others and the internal motivation to succeed tie together, this theory of being influenced by an environment come into play.[8]

Social control theory

According to this theory, delinquency occurs when an individual's feelings of attachment towards others, commitment to current or future activities, involvement (i.e., time spent) in various activities, and commitment to the beliefs/moral value system of society are weakened.[22][23] The quality of a schools' climate is important for promoting students' commitment and involvement in academic activities. A strong bond with the school community strengthens students' attachment to the school and encourages compliance to school norms. The interplay of these factors reduces the likelihood of deviant behavior.[4]

Impact

Mental health and social-emotional well-being

Studies have shown that school climate can directly affect students' mental health and social-emotional well-being. The quality of life within a school setting can promote the healthy social and emotional development of students.[24] Many aspects linked to a positive school climate such as the ones described above (e.g. school belonging, respect for student opinions, and supportive relationships) are factors directly related in student psychological functioning.[4] For instance, in a study that examined adolescents' perceptions of several dimensions of school climate, researchers emotional support from teachers and the promotion of autonomy and discussion were linked to fewer depressive symptoms in adolescents.[25] When students perceive their classroom rules, school discipline, and overall school safety as fair, they are less likely to experience feelings of loneliness, anxiety, and depression (Grapham et al., 2006; Ozer & Weinstein, 2004). A positive school climate can also help students coping with social-emotional issues to develop resiliency.[24]

Research findings have also shown that a negative school climate can have detrimental effects on students' psychological and social-emotional well-being, leading to mental health problems.[24] For example, a higher incidence of conflict in schools is linked to a higher rate of childhood mental health disorders.[26] A negative school climate can also make existing social-emotional difficulties worse,[24] and these effects can be long-term.[27] For example, the severity of a student's mental health problems can increase over time if classroom conditions do not improve.[27] In a study of middle school adolescents' perceptions of school climate and its effect on psychological health, researchers found that dimensions of school climate (safety, relationships, connectedness, sense of belonging, etc.) and psychological and emotional health declined over three years. Additionally, declines in school climate were linked to declines in students' psychological adjustment.[28]

Academic achievement

A positive school climate is also important for student achievement. For example, in a study of elementary student achievement in reading and mathematics, positive teacher characteristics such as setting high but achievable goals, believing in students, and commitment to students' academic success was associated with higher standardized test scores.[29] Research has shown that when teachers perceive themselves as efficacious, the school has effective principal leadership, and relationships between students and peers are positive, student standardized test scores, GPA, and grades are higher.[4] These relationships have been found among students in kindergarten to grade 12.[4]

There is also a relationship between school resource allocation and student achievement. Several research studies highlight the link between student achievement and resources such as teacher education and experience, class size, teacher to student ration, school facilities, classroom materials, and financial expenditures.[4]

Structural features of the school, such as the temperature and age of the building, can affect student performance and school attendance. In a study of students' exposure to adverse school building conditions and absenteeism, researchers found that student absenteeism was associated with visible mold and poor ventilation, among other factors.[30] If students are absent from school, academic achievement can be affected.

Behavioral outcomes

School climate has also been linked to behavioral problems within the school, such as bullying, delinquency, and aggressive behavior.[4] A high-quality academic environment within the school can reduce behavioral problems. For example, both lower student and teacher reports of behavioral problems have been documented in schools where teachers provide feedback on students' homework, assist in student goal-achievement, and encourage students' commitment to academic success.[31][32]

When students perceive that their school has a strong sense of solidarity and belonging, they are more likely to intervene or report when a peer engages in risk activities.[33] Research studies have also shown that reductions in student behavioral problems, aggression, and victimization are associated with positive relationships among school staff and peers.[4]

On teachers

The dimensions of school climate also affect teachers significantly. Teacher retention, or getting teachers to stay in the same school for many years, is an important issue in many schools. However, many factors linked to school climate have been found to affect teacher turnover rates. For instance, poor support from administration, student discipline problems, and not feeling they can contribute to decision making in the school are all conditions that are linked to poor teacher retention.[2] The relationships between teachers and their colleagues and the school administration, also play an important role in teacher's commitment to their profession.[7] In addition, school climate factors can influence teachers' mental health. For instance, poor relationships with students and colleagues and low parental and community involvement are related to emotional exhaustion (burnout) in teachers.[34] A negative school climate is also associated to teachers having more feelings of low personal accomplishment, more cynicism, and depersonalization.[7]

Improvement

The best way to improve school climate is different from school to school.[5] The promotion of a positive school climate is a general process that varies based on an individual school's strengths and weaknesses across different dimensions. Nonetheless, some general guidelines, or key practices, have been found to be effective to facilitate the process. School climate improvement can be defined as an intentional, strategic, collaborative, transparent, and coordinated effort to make school learning environments stronger.[35] Research suggests that engaging all members of the community is crucial for successful school improvement efforts.[35] According to the National School Climate Center,[36] an effective school climate improvement process is one that engages all stakeholders in six key practices:

  1. A collaborative, democratic decision-making process that involves all stakeholders. Stakeholders include not only school personnel and students, but also families and community members. These stakeholders have different roles and perspectives (e.g., teacher, bus driver, administration, maintenance staff, etc.)
  2. Action planning, intervention, and program implementation are driven by both quantitative (e.g., survey) and qualitative (e.g., interviews, focus groups) data, with the goal of continuously improving school climate. Frequent data collection should occur to evaluate and further develop the school improvement process.
  3. The unique needs of the students and school community are used to inform school improvement goals.
  4. Offering school personnel opportunities to learn as teams or to build learning communities so they help each other obtain, improve, and retain the skills and knowledge needed to do their jobs competently.
  5. Scientific research must be used to inform curriculum, instruction, student supports, and interventions. These school practices must also be based on sound cognitive, social-emotional, and ecological theories of youth development. Healthy student development and learning environments are promoted through the implementation of strength- and risk-based practices and programs.
  6. Through the school improvement process, policies and procedures pertaining to the school learning environment, as well as operational infrastructure to facilitate the collection of data, effective planning, implementation, evaluation, and sustainability, are strengthened.[35]

Measures

In schools, obtaining an accurate picture of a climate is an essential component for improving the learning environment. Information about school climate can be collected in many ways; however, surveys are the most common method used by researchers (92%).[4] Conducting interviews and focus groups are other ways to collect information on school climate, with an estimated 8% of research studies making use of these methods.[37][38][39][40] Another, less common, method is the use of observational reports and ratings of school climate.[4] An example of this method of measurement is visiting elementary schools to rate school design patterns of outside space and the condition of bathroom facilities.[41]

As part of the school climate improvement process, these measures can be used to highlight a school's areas of strength and areas in need of improvement. It can also be used to assess changes in school climate over time.[5] School climate can be assessed indirectly through measures such as student attendance, suspensions, teacher turnover, or student mobility. It can also be assessed more directly by gathering information from members of the school.[5]

When gathering information about school climate, it is recommended to gather information from multiple perspectives (e.g., teachers, administrators, students, etc.). For instance, a study comparing parents', teachers', and students' perceptions of school climate found that students reported worse ratings of safety and connectedness than the adults.[42] In addition, some student characteristics also affect their perception of school climate. Therefore, having behavior problems, being held back a grade, coming from a single-parent family, or having a different ethnic background can all influence a student's perception of school climate.[7] This emphasizes the importance of gathering information from different informants when assessing school climate.

Diversity

Students' race and ethnicity can have an influence on their perception of the school's climate.[7] For instance, a study collected information from African American and white middle school students found differences in their perception of racial climate in their school.[43] Therefore, African American, female, and lower income students have a more negative perception of the racial climate than white, middle class, and male students. Another study also conducted with middle school students found that students from a Hispanic/Latino background felt that relationships with teachers played a bigger role in their perception of community climate than relationships with students. In contrast, student relationships was a higher priority for Asian and white students.[44]

Sexual orientation can also have an important effect on students' experiences in school. For instance, a survey of American middle and high school students conducted in 2013 found that more than half the students who identified as gay, bisexual, lesbian, or transgender felt unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation, and more than a third felt unsafe because of their gender expression.[45] The survey suggests that LGBT students' ethnicity also affects their perception of school safety. For example, it was found that LGBT students who had an Asian background reported lower rates of peer victimization directed at their sexual orientation or gender expression.[45] These findings highlight the importance of considering the perspective of students from different cultural and ethnic backgrounds when trying to improve school climate for all.[7]

gollark: I think palaiologos wanted to get around their self-muting by leaving and rejoining. So hi.
gollark: But I think you could say that lots of things which kill you just work by reducing the amount of something or other in your body.
gollark: Well, that's the mechanism apparently, but the effect is that if you drink too much water you die.
gollark: You can overdose on *water*, if you have a lot of water.
gollark: You can overdose on basically anything.

See also

References
  1. Freinerg, H. J. (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press. p. 11.
  2. Cohen, J.; McCabe, E. M.; Michelli, N. M.; Pickeral, T. (2009). "School Climate: Research, Policy, Practice, and Teacher Education". Teachers College Record. 111: 180–213.
  3. National School Climate Council (2007). The School Climate Challenge: Narrowing the gap between school climate research and school climate policy, practice guidelines and teacher education policy. www.schoolclimate.org/climate/policy.php: National Center for Learning and Citizenship, Education Commission of the States.
  4. Wang, Ming-Te; Degol, Jessica L. (2016). "School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes". Educational Psychology Review. 28 (2): 315–352. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1.
  5. Thomas, A; Grimes, J (2002). Best Practices in School Psychology IV. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. pp. 929–947.
  6. Maslow, A.H. (1943). "A theory of human motivation". Psychological Review. 50 (4): 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346.
  7. Thapa, A.; Cohen, J.; Guffey, S.; Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). "A Review of School Climate Research". Review of Educational Research. 83 (3): 357–385. doi:10.3102/0034654313483907. hdl:10818/10104.
  8. Steele, D. M., & Cohn-Vargas, B. (2013). Identity safe classrooms: Places to belong and learn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, a Sage Company.
  9. Bronfenbrenner, Urie (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  10. "Urie Bronfenbrenner and Child Development". Retrieved 2018-12-06.
  11. Edinente, Maria Rosa (December 2013). "Urie Bronfenbrenner's Theory of Human Development: Its Evolution From Ecology to Bioecology" (PDF). Journal of Family Theory and Review. 5 (4): 243–258. doi:10.1111/jftr.12022.
  12. Rutter, Michael (2006). "Implications of resilience concepts for scientific understanding" (PDF). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1094: 1–12. doi:10.1196/annals.1376.002. PMID 17347337.
  13. Zimmerman, Marc A.; Arunkumar, Revathy (1994). "Resiliency research: Implications for schools and policy". Social Policy Report. 8 (4): 1–18. doi:10.1002/j.2379-3988.1994.tb00032.x.
  14. Brooks, Jean E. (2006). "Strengthening resilience in children and youths: Maximizing opportunities through the school". Children & Schools. 28 (2): 69–76. doi:10.1093/cs/28.2.69.
  15. Fraser, M. W.; Galinsky, M. J.; Richman, J. M. (1999). "Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice". Social Work Research. 23 (3): 131–143. doi:10.1093/swr/23.3.131.
  16. Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  17. Eccles, J. S.; Midgley, C. (1989). "Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents". In Ames, R.; Ames, C. (eds.). Research on motivation in education. 3. New York: Academic Press.
  18. Eccles, J. S.; Lord, S. E.; Roeser, R. W. (1996). "Round holes, square pegs, rocky roads, and sore feet: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools". In Cicchetti, D.; Toth, S. (eds.). Adolescence: Opportunities and challenges. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
  19. Eccles, J. S.; Midgley, C.; Wigfield, A.; Buchanan, C. M.; Reuman, D.; Flanagan, C.; Mac Iver, D. (1993). "Development during adolescence: The impact of stage environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families". American Psychologist. 48 (2): 90–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.
  20. Roeser, R. W.; Eccles, J. S. (1996). "Adolescents' perceptions of middle school: Relation to longitudinal changes in academic and psychological adjustment". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 8: 123–158. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0801_6.
  21. Wen, Nicole J. (2017). Smart conformists- Children and adolescents associate conformity with intelligence across cultures. p. 9. PMID 28836660.
  22. Agnew, R. (1993). "Why do they do it? An examination of the intervening mechanisms between Bsocial control variables and delinquency". Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 30 (3): 245–266. doi:10.1177/0022427893030003001.
  23. Hirschi, T (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  24. McGiboney, Garry Wade (2016). The psychology of school climate. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 9781443896689.
  25. Wang, Ming-Te (2009). "School climate support for behavioural and psychological adjustment: Testing the mediating effect of social competence". School Psychology Quarterly. 24 (4): 240–251. doi:10.1037/a0017999.
  26. Kasen, S. N.; Johnson, J.; Cohen, P. (1990). "The impact of social emotional climate on student psychopathology". Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 18 (2): 165–177. doi:10.1007/BF00910728. PMID 2348030.
  27. Somersalo, H.; Solantaus, T.; Almqvist, F. (2002). "Classroom climate and the mental health of primary school children". Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 56 (4): 285–290. doi:10.1080/08039480260242787. PMID 12470320.
  28. Way, N.; Reddy, R.; Rhodes, J. (2007). "Students' perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment". American Journal of Community Psychology. 40 (3–4): 194–213. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9143-y. PMID 17968655.
  29. Goddard, R. D.; Sweetland, S. R.; Hoy, W. K. (2000). "Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis". Educational Administration Quarterly. 36 (5): 683–702. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.952.7476. doi:10.1177/00131610021969164.
  30. Simons, E.; Hwang, S. A.; Fitzgerald, E. F.; Kielb, C.; Lin, S. (2010). "The impact of school building conditions on student absenteeism in upstate New York". American Journal of Public Health. 100 (9): 1679–1686. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.165324. PMC 2920982. PMID 20634471.
  31. Kasen, S.; Cohen, P.; Brook, J. S. (1998). "Adolescent school experiences and dropout, adolescent pregnancy, and young adult deviant behavior". Journal of Adolescent Research. 13 (1): 49–72. doi:10.1177/0743554898131004. PMID 12348538.
  32. Wang, M. T.; Dishion, T. J. (2012). "The trajectories of adolescents' perceptions of school climate, deviant peer affiliation, and behavioral problems during the middle school years". Journal of Research on Adolescence. 22 (1): 40–53. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00763.x. PMC 3399661. PMID 22822296.
  33. Syvertsen, A. K.; Flanagan, C. A.; Stout, M. D. (2009). "Code of silence: students' perceptions of school climate and willingness to intervene in a peer's dangerous plan". Journal of Educational Psychology. 101 (1): 219–232. doi:10.1037/a0013246. PMC 2745177. PMID 20126300.
  34. Grayson, J.L.; Alvarez, H.K. (2008). "School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model". Teaching & Teacher Education. 24 (5): 1349–1363. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.06.005.
  35. Ice, M.; Thapa, A.; Cohen, J. (2015). "Recognizing community voice and a youth-led school–community partnership in the school climate improvement process" (PDF). School Community Journal. 25: 9–28.
  36. "National School Climate Centre". April 5, 2017.
  37. Bryant, V. C.; Shdaimah, C.; Sander, R. L.; Cornelius, L. J. (2013). "School as haven: transforming school environments into welcoming learning communities". Children and Youth Services Review. 35 (5): 848–855. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.02.001.
  38. Gittelsohn, J.; Merkle, S.; Story, M.; Stone, E. J.; Steckler, A.; Noel, J.; Ethelbah, B. (2003). "School climate and implementation of the pathways study". Preventive Medicine. 37 (6 Pt 2): S97–S106. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.08.010. PMID 14636814.
  39. Griffith, J. (1999). "School climate as "social order" and "social action": A multi-level analysis of public elementary school student perceptions". Social Psychology of Education. 2 (3/4): 339–369. doi:10.1023/A:1009657422344.
  40. McGuire, J. K.; Anderson, C. R.; Toomey, R. B.; Russell, S. T. (2010). "School climate for transgender youth: a mixed method investigation of student experiences and school responses". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 39 (10): 1175–1188. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9540-7. PMID 20428933.
  41. Tanner, C. K. (2000). "The influence of school architecture on academic achievement". Journal of Educational Administration. 38 (4): 309–330. doi:10.1108/09578230010373598.
  42. Ramsey, C.M.; Spira, A.P.; Parisi, J.M.; G.W., Rebok (2016). "School climate: perceptual differences between students, parents, and school staff". School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 27 (4): 629–641. doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1199436. PMC 5473611. PMID 28642631.
  43. Watkins, N.D.; Aber, M.S. (2009). "Exploring the relationships among race, class, gender, and middle school students' perceptions of school racial climate". Equity & Excellence in Education. 42 (4): 395–411. doi:10.1080/10665680903260218.
  44. Schneider, S.H.; Duran, L. (2010). "School climate in middle schools: A cultural perspective". Journal of Research in Character Education. 8: 25–37.
  45. Kosciw, J. G.; Greytak, E. A.; Palmer, N. A.; Boesen, M. J. (2014). The 2013 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation's schools (PDF). New York: GLSEN.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.