Schanuel's lemma

In mathematics, especially in the area of algebra known as module theory, Schanuel's lemma, named after Stephen Schanuel, allows one to compare how far modules depart from being projective. It is useful in defining the Heller operator in the stable category, and in giving elementary descriptions of dimension shifting.

Statement

Schanuel's lemma is the following statement:

If 0 → K → P → M → 0 and 0 → K' → P ' → M → 0 are short exact sequences of R-modules and P and P ' are projective, then K ⊕ P ' is isomorphic to K ' ⊕ P.

Proof

Define the following submodule of P ⊕ P ', where φ : P → M and φ' : P ' → M:

X=\{(p,q)\in P\oplus P^{\prime }:\phi (p)=\phi ^{\prime }(q)\}.

The map π : X → P, where π is defined as the projection of the first coordinate of X into P, is surjective. Since φ' is surjective, for any p $\in$ P, one may find a q $\in$ P ' such that φ(p) = φ '(q). This gives (p,q) $\in$ X with π (p,q) = p. Now examine the kernel of the map π :

{\begin{aligned}\ker \pi &=\{(0,q):(0,q)\in X\}\\&=\{(0,q):\phi ^{\prime }(q)=0\}\\&\cong \ker \phi ^{\prime }\cong K^{\prime }.\end{aligned}}

We may conclude that there is a short exact sequence

0\rightarrow K^{\prime }\rightarrow X\rightarrow P\rightarrow 0.

Since P is projective this sequence splits, so X ≅ K ' ⊕ P . Similarly, we can write another map π : X → P ', and the same argument as above shows that there is another short exact sequence

0\rightarrow K\rightarrow X\rightarrow P^{\prime }\rightarrow 0,

and so X ≅ P ' ⊕ K. Combining the two equivalences for X gives the desired result.

Long exact sequences

The above argument may also be generalized to long exact sequences.[1]

Origins

Stephen Schanuel discovered the argument in Irving Kaplansky's homological algebra course at the University of Chicago in Autumn of 1958. Kaplansky writes:

Early in the course I formed a one-step projective resolution of a module, and remarked that if the kernel was projective in one resolution it was projective in all. I added that, although the statement was so simple and straightforward, it would be a while before we proved it. Steve Schanuel spoke up and told me and the class that it was quite easy, and thereupon sketched what has come to be known as "Schanuel's lemma." [2]

Notes

Lam, T.Y. (1999). Lectures on Modules and Rings. Springer. ISBN 0-387-98428-3. pgs. 165–167.
Kaplansky, Irving (1972). Fields and Rings. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics (2nd ed.). University Of Chicago Press. pp. 165–168. ISBN 0-226-42451-0. Zbl 1001.16500.

gollark: Greeituasiohgasf.

gollark: Oh, cool spinoff idea, real world adblockers using selectively opaque-able glasses and computer vision.

gollark: You'd probably have to block visual input, too, hmmm...

gollark: But imagine if advancing technology allowed us to avoid all spoilers ever of any kind anywhere!

gollark: Anyway, you could *probably* work out some sort of system to filter out news-y things on the internet, but of course COVID-19 is quite wideranging so some would likely slip through. And for real life communication you would probably have to... what, block out parts of conversation with constantly on headphone things and dynamically generate replacements? Hard.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Lam, T.Y. (1999). Lectures on Modules and Rings. Springer. ISBN 0-387-98428-3. pgs. 165–167.

[2] Kaplansky, Irving (1972). Fields and Rings. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics (2nd ed.). University Of Chicago Press. pp. 165–168. ISBN 0-226-42451-0. Zbl 1001.16500.