Sangkhla Buri District

Sangkhla Buri (Thai: สังขละบุรี, pronounced [sǎŋ.kʰlàʔ bū.rīː]) is a district (amphoe) in Kanchanaburi Province in western Thailand.

Sangkhla Buri

สังขละบุรี
District location in Kanchanaburi Province
Coordinates: 15°9′20″N 98°27′12″E
CountryThailand
ProvinceKanchanaburi
SeatNong Lu
Area
  Total3,349.4 km2 (1,293.2 sq mi)
Population
 (2005)
  Total40,162
  Density12.0/km2 (31/sq mi)
Time zoneUTC+7 (ICT)
Postal code71240
Geocode7108

Geography

Sangkhla Buri is in the far west of the province, on the Myanmar border. Three Pagodas Pass is the border crossing station to Myanmar. A large part of the district is covered by the Khao Laem Reservoir, an artificial lake formed by the Vajiralongkorn Dam on the Khwae Noi River.

Neighboring jurisdictions are (from the west clockwise) Tanintharyi Division, Mon State and Kayin State of Myanmar, Umphang District of Tak Province, and Thong Pha Phum District of Kanchanaburi.

History

In 1939 the district Wang Ka (วังกะ) was renamed Sangkhla Buri, which was previously the name of the minor district Thong Pha Phum.[1] On 20 May 1941 the district was downgraded to a minor district (king amphoe) and made a subordinate of Thong Pha Phum District. It then consisted of the four tambons: Nong Lu, Prangphle, Laiwo, and Lang Phu Sa.[2] It was again upgraded to full district status on 27 July 1965.[3]

Administration

The district is divided into three subdistricts (tambons), which are further subdivided into 20 villages (mubans). Wang Ka is a township (thesaban tambon) and covers parts of tambon Nong Lu. There are a further three tambon administrative organizations (TAO).

No. Name Thai name Villages Pop.
1.Nong Luหนองลู1030,534
2.Prangphleปรังเผล45,191
3.Laiwoไล่โว่64,437

Uttamanusorn Bridge

A 2014 Bangkok Post article said that the "Uttamanusorn Bridge, better known as Saphan Mon,...built almost 30 years ago by the people, for the people of Ban Wangka, a Mon village" is the most popular tourist landmark in the district".[4]

gollark: [BEES EXPUNGED]
gollark: ```<service-status.osmarks.tk> [BEES EXPUNGED] [07/Jun/2020:08:24:38 +0000] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 301 169 "http://service-status.osmarks.tk/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 9; Mi A1 Build/PKQ1.180917.001; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/74.0.3729.157 Mobile Safari/537.36"<service-status.osmarks.tk> [BEES EXPUNGED] [07/Jun/2020:08:24:39 +0000] "OPTIONS / HTTP/1.1" 301 169 "http://service-status.osmarks.tk/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/76.0.3809.71 Safari/537.36"<osmarks.tk> [BEES EXPUNGED] [07/Jun/2020:08:27:18 +0000] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 6124 "https://service-status.osmarks.tk/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; en-us; Nexus 5 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko; googleweblight) Chrome/38.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19"<osmarks.tk> [BEES EXPUNGED] [07/Jun/2020:08:29:15 +0000] "GET /csproblem/ HTTP/1.1" 200 5477 "https://osmarks.tk/csproblem/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; en-us; Nexus 5 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko; googleweblight) Chrome/38.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19"```
gollark: How did they even *know* about that subdomain? Certificate transparency logs?
gollark: Also, its user agent is different each time.
gollark: It looked at service-status.osmarks.tk, which has literally nothing on it but redirects to osmarks.tk right now.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.