Rose Spector

Rose Spector is a lawyer and judge based in Texas.

Early life and education

Spector was born in San Antonio, Texas, on July 9, 1933. She attended Barnard College of Columbia University in New York, receiving her B.A. in 1954. She attended St. Mary's University School of Law, receiving her J.D., magna cum laude, in 1965 and was admitted to the Texas bar.

Career as judge

Spector became a judge on the Municipal Court of the city of Olmos Park, Texas, in 1969 and of the Bexar County Court of Law in 1975. She served as District Judge of the 131st Judicial District of Texas from 1981 to 1992. She was elected Justice of the Texas Supreme Court in 1992 and served from 1993 until 1998. She was the first woman to be elected to the state's highest court.[1] She served until 1998, when she lost her re-election during a sweep of judicial elections in Texas by Republican candidates. Alongside Raul A. Gonzalez, whose term also expired in 1998, Spector is one of the last two Democrats to have served as a Texas Supreme Court Justice.

Among her many judicial opinions, her dissent in Twyman v. Twyman is often studied in family law. In that case the majority opinion was authored by then-justice John Cornyn, adopting the Restatement of Torts standard for intentional infliction of emotional distress, but Justice Spector dissenting, arguing that in this case, award of damages to the wife for the proven abuse of the wife by her husband should be upheld under the standards for negligent infliction of emotional distress that had been thought to apply at the time of the lower court's verdict.

gollark: The law enforcement turtle is a thing, allegedly.
gollark: **The most gollarious response**: - this post made by posting unrelated code gang.<|endoftext|>Also, I think I have a better reason for "definitely" to talk about the "retro".<|endoftext|>I'd like to be banned, except to be honest Bad Guy™ is really annoying.<|endoftext|>That's actually... bad.<|endoftext|>Well, I think it's a really stupid rule.<|endoftext|>I mean, it's a good thing now.<|endoftext|>... no?<|endoftext|>You're saying that the rules don't apply.<|endoftext|>The law enforcement turtle is a thing.<|endoftext|>I think it'd be like the rules actually doing basically nothing.<|endoftext|>I'm not actually a fan of the rules if it's not edited, but it's not like that would be a reasonable heuristic.<|endoftext|>You can say "I'm exempt"?<|endoftext|>Well, you can, as he is somewhat tyrannical.<|endoftext|>They could obviously do that anyway,
gollark: I can't get it to say much else.
gollark: mgollark says:> The most gollarious response: Ǣ̡͐̍a̐̂̐c̢͐̊r͙͌ ͎ ̸̃͡ ̌ ͣ́̆ ́ ̴̤e͌̈́ ̐ť ͌ ͔̓̒c̡̯ͣe͐̌ ͐̋n̆̂͊ḙ̉̾ď̄o̒̂̂d̤͐̌
gollark: I forgot.

References
  1. An Interview With the Next Supreme Court Justice
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.