Ronald A. Lindsay

Ronald A. Lindsay was president and CEO of the Center for Inquiry and of its affiliates, the Council for Secular Humanism and the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. He held this position June 2008 – 2016.

Ronald A. Lindsay
Ron Lindsay giving a lecture on his book, "The Necessity of Secularism."
NationalityAmerican
EducationPhD Georgetown University, JD University of Virginia
Ron Lindsay at Reason Rally in March 2012

Philosophical work

Lindsay has a PhD in philosophy from Georgetown University, with a concentration in bioethics. He is the author of the book Future Bioethics: Overcoming, Taboos, Myths, and Dogmas (Prometheus: 2008).[1] The book was favorably reviewed by the journal Nature, which described it as “reasoned, readable, and accessible.” [2] In the book Lindsay argues for, among other things, legalization of assisted suicide and a removal of restrictions on embryonic stem cell research. He has published a number of articles in peer-reviewed journals, including the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal and the American Journal of Bioethics. These articles, like his book, focus on topics in bioethics, including the morality of assisted suicide and human enhancement technology.[3][4][5][6] Lindsay also wrote the essay on Euthanasia for the International Encyclopedia of Ethics (Wiley-Blackwell: 2013).[7]

Lindsay has also written several articles on ethical issues for Free Inquiry, the publication of the Council for Secular Humanism. These articles include a vigorous defense of equal rights for LGBT individuals, and a discussion of the foundation for a nonreligious ethics.[8]

Lindsay’s latest book is The Necessity of Secularism: Why God Can’t Tell Us What to Do (Pitchstone 2014).[9] In this book, Lindsay argues that for democratic discourse to be successful, religious doctrines need to be kept out of public policy discussions, since these doctrines are meaningful only to members of particular religions.

In addition to his PhD in philosophy, Lindsay has a law degree from the University of Virginia. Before joining the Center for Inquiry, he practiced law for twenty-six years with the law firm of Seyfarth Shaw LLP. He concentrated in employment law and his appellate cases indicate he represented employers.[10][11]

Lindsay, however, also represented clients pro bono in church-state matters, which is where he made his acquaintance with atheist and humanist leaders. He represented the well-known atheist Madalyn Murray O'Hair in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of chaplains in Congress. Although O’Hair initially received a favorable decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, her case was later mooted by the Supreme Court decision in Marsh v. Chambers.[12]

Lindsay subsequently represented humanist leader, and founder of the Center for Inquiry, Paul Kurtz in a lawsuit, Kurtz v. Baker,[13][14] that challenged certain aspects of Congress’s practice of having official chaplains that had not been addressed by the decision in Marsh v. Chambers. Specifically, Kurtz argued that the Senate chaplain used his government-funded opening prayers to attack nontheists. Kurtz also challenged the chaplains’ refusal to allow him to open a Senate or a House session as a “guest” who would deliver solemn, nonreligious remarks. The federal district court judge who reviewed the prayers was troubled by the Senate chaplain’s remarks. This claim was resolved when the Senate chaplain wrote an apology to Kurtz and pledged to refrain from disparaging nonbelievers.[15] The second claim was ultimately dismissed on appeal with the appellate court finding that Kurtz lacked standing.

Lindsay also submitted amicus briefs on behalf of the Center for Inquiry or the Council for Secular Humanism in various Supreme Court cases, such as the Ten Commandments case, McCreary County v. ACLU.[16]

Ronald Lindsay "Why Skepticism?" at CSICon Las Vegas in 2016

Lindsay's tenure at the Center for Inquiry

In March, 2011, the Center for Inquiry launched an advertising campaign in various cities, with billboards and subway ads proclaiming "You don't need God–to hope, to care, to love, to live." The campaign received significant media attention. A second phase of the campaign was launched in the fall of 2011 based on donor support for the campaign.[17][18]

In August, 2011, the Center for Inquiry and its affiliate, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, submitted petitions to the Food and Drug Administration, authored by Lindsay and Barry Karr, Executive Director of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. The petitions requested the agency to require homeopathic drugs to be tested for efficacy.[19]

Along with the leaders of other secular organizations, Lindsay spoke at the Reason Rally, held on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. on March 24, 2012.[20]

In 2014, the Center for Inquiry launched a web-based campaign to “Keep Health Care Safe and Secular,”[21] focusing on reproductive rights, the dangers in alternative medicine, and the importance of vaccination.

Also in 2014, the Center for Inquiry prevailed in an appellate court case in which it sought equal rights for nonbelievers. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled in Center for Inquiry v. Marion Circuit Court Clerk[22] that nonreligious individuals have the right to choose secular celebrants to officiate at their weddings.

In January 2015, the Center for Inquiry carried out a corporate consolidation, merging with its two affiliates, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and the Council for Secular Humanism.[23]

Lindsay and Center for Inquiry founder Paul Kurtz had disagreements over the operation of the organization which drew the attention of The New York Times.[24] Kurtz eventually resigned all his positions with the Center for Inquiry and its affiliates in May 2010. Both Kurtz and Lindsay were interviewed in October 2010 by the blogger Eric Veith.[25][26] These interviews provide more detail about their differing perceptions of their conflict.

gollark: Blame it on loose bees in the circuits or something.
gollark: Pretend that the laptop slowed down and can't run anything but TempleOS.
gollark: Install TempleOS.
gollark: Why would "neighbors" be *scared* of you?
gollark: If you have at least two laptops/tablets per person, that probably wont' happen!KLLNKJ

References
  1. Lindsay, Ronald (15 July 2008) Future Bioethics: Overcoming, Taboos, Myths, and Dogmas Prometheus
  2. "Bioethics laid bare" 23 October 2008 Nature
  3. Lindsay, Ronald Enhancements and Justice: Problems in Determining the Requirements of Justice in a Genetically Transformed Society March 2005 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
  4. Lindsay, Ronald Slaves, Embryos, and Nonhuman Animals: Moral Status and the Limitations of Common Morality Theory December 2005 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
  5. Lindsay, Ronald A. (2002). "Should We Impose Quotas? Evaluating the "Disparate Impact" Argument Against Legalization of Assisted Suicide". The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 30 (1): 6–16. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00714.x. PMID 11905270.
  6. March 2009 American Journal of Bioethics
  7. International Encyclopedia of Ethics (Wiley-Blackwell: 2013).
  8. Lindsay, Ronald "How Morality Has the Objectivity that Matters—Without God"
  9. Lindsay, Ronald 2014 The Necessity of Secularism: Why God Can’t Tell Us What to Do
  10. Summers v. Howard University Open Jurist
  11. White, Gaskins v. BFI Waste Services
  12. Murray v. Buchanan Open Jurist
  13. Kurtz v. Baker Open Jurist
  14. Kurtz v. Baker Leagle
  15. "Letter from the Senate chaplain"
  16. McCreary County v. ACLU, Center for Inquiry
  17. Esmonde, Donn; 18 September 2011 "A billboard nonbelievers can believe in" The Buffalo News
  18. Wingrove, Rick; 22 September 2011 "Living Without Religion" The Washington Post
  19. Petition Seeks FDA Review of Homeopathic Drugs
  20. Video of Ronald Lindsay speaking at the 2012 Reason Rally in Washington, DC.
  21. Keep Health Care Safe and Secular
  22. Center for Inquiry v. Marion Circuit Court Clerk
  23. "A Unified Center for Inquiry, Stronger Than Ever"
  24. Oppenheimer, Mark; 1 October 2010 "Closer Look at Rift Between Humanists Reveals Deeper Divisions" The New York Times
  25. Departure from CFI Dangerous Intersection
  26. Responds to Claim of Kurtz Dangerous Intersection
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.