Roll Over, Baby
Roll Over, Baby is the fifth studio album released by blues guitarist, Guitar Shorty (David Kearney). The album was recorded in April and May 1998 and released later that year in August on CD by the label Black Top.
Roll Over, Baby | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Studio album by | ||||
Released | August 11, 1998 | |||
Recorded | April — May, 1998 | |||
Genre | blues blues rock | |||
Length | 55:42 | |||
Label | Black Top | |||
Producer | Hammond Scott Nauman S. Scott | |||
Guitar Shorty chronology | ||||
|
Track listing
- "I Want to Report a Crime" (Williams) — 4:06
- "Roll over, Baby" (Williams) — 4:48
- "Sugar Wugar" (Kearney, Scott) — 4:46
- "You're a Troublemaker" (Kearney, Scott) — 5:21
- "Don't Mess With My Woman" (Kearney) — 4:36
- "Me and You Last Night" (Williams) — 3:20
- "Let's Get Close" (Kearney) — 3:10
- "I Wonder Who's Sleeping in My Bed" (Kearney) — 7:04
- "The Porkchop Song" (Williams) — 2:46
- "I'm Going Back to Houston" (Kearney) — 4:16
- "Hard Time Woman" (Alexander, Kearney) — 4:14
- "Hey Joe" (Roberts) — 7:15
Personnel
- David Torkanowsky — piano, organ (hammond)
- Ernest Youngblood, Jr. — saxophone (tenor)
- Guitar Shorty — guitar, vocals
- Mark "Kaz" Kazanoff — saxophone (baritone, tenor)
- Kenneth Blevins, Shannon Powell, Danny Pucillo Quartet — percussion, drums
- Jamil Sharif, Gary Slechta — trumpets
- Rick Trolsen — trombone
- Lee Allen Zeno — bass, associate producer
Production:
- David Farrell, Steve Reynolds — engineers, editing, mixing, sequencing
- Blake Thompson — production assistant
- Rick Olivier — photography
- Hammond Scott — producer, editing, mixing, sequencing
- Nauman S. Scott — executive producer
- Diane Wanek — design
- Heather West — production coordination
Reception
Review scores | |
---|---|
Source | Rating |
Allmusic |
Allmusic says that "Guitar Shorty keeps it lean, mean and direct on this outing" and that the album "showcases the guitarist's wide-ranging chops and skills."[2]
gollark: Why? You will have less money.
gollark: That's nice.
gollark: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fpuzzlewocky.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F04%2Fnewcombsparadox.jpg%3Fresize%3D639%252C229%26ssl%3D1&f=1&nofb=1
gollark: Here's a "helpful" illustration.
gollark: Consider the scenario: there are two boxes before you. One of the boxes (let us call it "A") is transparent and contains £10000, which you can see. The other box ("B") is opaque. It contains £1000000 if and only if the entity running this weird scenario predicted (beforehand) that you'll take box B and not box A. Historically, it has been right the vast majority of the time about this. Your options are to take both boxes, or just to take B. What do?!
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.