Robb Willer

Robb Willer (born 1977) is an American sociologist and social psychologist who studies politics, morality, status, cooperation, and masculinity. He is a professor of sociology, psychology, and organizational behavior at Stanford University[1]. He earned his Ph.D. in sociology at Cornell University[1][2].

Robb Willer
Born1977 (age 42–43)
NationalityAmerican
Alma materCornell University
Scientific career
InstitutionsStanford University University of California, Berkeley
Websitewww.robbwiller.org

Research

Robb Willer has published more than 40 scientific articles in journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, American Journal of Sociology, American Sociological Review, Annual Review of Sociology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, and Psychological Science[3][1]. He has received grants from the California Environmental Protection Agency, and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, and the National Science Foundation[1]. As of July 12, 2017, his Google Scholar h-index was 30 and his i10-index was 49, with 5,402 citations[3].

Much of Willer's research focuses on political psychology and sociology, exploring both sources of political polarization and ways it can be reduced[1][4]. He and Matthew Feinberg developed the idea of "moral reframing"[5]. Based on moral foundations theory, moral reframing is a technique of political persuasion in which a political message draws a connection between a given issue and the audience's assumed moral values[6]. Willer's talk on political communication has been viewed over 1 million times since it was posted on the TED website January 20, 2017[7].

Willer's other research on politics emphasizes the effects of various forms of threat and anxiety on political attitudes, for example, the effects of racial status threats,[8] terror threats,[9] and masculinity threats[10]. He has studied masculine overcompensation, showing that men whose masculinity has been threatened tend to adopt more stereotypically masculine attitudes on issues like war and gay rights[11].

His master's thesis used the text from the Sokal affair to investigate the effects of academic status on the evaluation of unintelligible academic texts, finding that unintelligible texts are evaluated more positively if authored by high status academics.

He contributed research to the best-selling book Modern Romance: An Investigation, by Aziz Ansari and Eric Klinenberg.

Teaching

Prior to moving Stanford, Willer was an assistant professor at UC Berkeley's Sociology Department[1]. Willer was the 2009 recipient of the Golden Apple Award for Outstanding Teaching[12], the only teaching award given by the UC-Berkeley student body.

Media coverage

Willer's research has received widespread media coverage including from the Chicago Tribune[13], CNN[14], Forbes[15], Huffington Post[16][17], LA Times[18], Nature[19], New York Daily News[20], New York magazine[21][22][23], NPR's Morning Edition[24], Pacific Standard[25][26][27], Salon[28], San Francisco Chronicle[29][30], Science[31], Scientific American[32], The Atlantic[33][34][35][36][37][38][39], The Daily Telegraph[40], The New York Times[41][42][43][44], Time[45], USA Today[46][47], Vox[48][49], Wall Street Journal[50][51], and Washington Post[52][53][54].

Selected publications
  • Michael W. Macy and Robb Willer. 2002. "From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling". Annual Review of Sociology. 28:143-66.
  • Damon Centola, Robb Willer, and Michael W. Macy. 2005. "The Emperor's Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self-Enforcing Norms". American Journal of Sociology. 110(4):1009-40.
  • Pat Barclay and Robb Willer. 2007. "Partner Choice Creates Competitive Altruism in Humans". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 274:749-753.
  • Robb Willer, Ko Kuwabara, and Michael W. Macy. 2009. "The False Enforcement of Unpopular Norms". American Journal of Sociology. 115:451-90.
  • Robb Willer. 2009. "Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem". American Sociological Review. 74:23–43.
  • Matthew Feinberg and Robb Willer. 2011. "Apocalypse Soon? Dire Messages Reduce Belief in Global Warming by Contradicting Just World Beliefs." Psychological Science. 22:34-38.
  • Matthew Feinberg, Robb Willer, and Dacher Keltner. 2012. "Flustered and Faithful: Embarrassment as a Signal of Prosociality." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102:81-97.
  • Cameron Anderson, Robb Willer, Gavin Kilduff, and Courtney Brown. 2012. "The Origins of Deference: When do People Prefer Lower Status?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102:1077–1088.
  • Matthew Feinberg, Robb Willer, Jennifer Stellar, and Dacher Keltner. 2012. "The Virtues of Gossip: Reputational Information Sharing as Prosocial Behavior." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  • Matthew Feinberg and Robb Willer. 2013. "The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes". Psychological Science. 24:56-62.
  • Robb Willer, Christabel Rogalin, Bridget Conlon, and Michael T. Wojnowicz. 2013. "Overdoing Gender: A Test of the Masculine Overcompensation Thesis." American Journal of Sociology. 118:980-1022.
  • Stéphane Côté, Julian House, and Robb Willer. 2015. “High Economic Inequality Leads Higher Income Individuals to be Less Generous.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  • Matthew Feinberg and Robb Willer. 2015. "From Gulf to Bridge: When Moral Arguments Facilitate Political Influence." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
gollark: The transit files are a serialized datascript database or something and may be hard for other programs to read. Also, I think it mostly stores data in memory, so you wouldn't see your changes instantly.
gollark: If the probability of false positives is low relative to the number of possible keys, it's probably fine™.
gollark: I don't think you can *in general*, but you'll probably know in some cases what the content might be. Lots of network protocols and such include checksums and headers and defined formats, which can be validated, and English text could be detected.
gollark: But having access to several orders of magnitude of computing power than exists on Earth, and quantum computers (which can break the hard problems involved in all widely used asymmetric stuff) would.
gollark: Like how in theory on arbitrarily big numbers the fastest way to do multiplication is with some insane thing involving lots of Fourier transforms, but on averagely sized numbers it isn't very helpful.

References
  1. "Robb Willer - Department of Sociology". sociology.Stanford.edu. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  2. "Robb Willer". Robb Willer. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  3. "Robb Willer - Google Scholar Citations". scholar.Google.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  4. "Robb Willer". Robb Willer. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  5. University, Stanford (October 12, 2015). "Stanford sociologist shows how to make effective political arguments". Stanford.edu. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  6. Feinberg, Matthew; Willer, Robb (January 1, 2013). "The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes". Psychological Science. 24 (1): 56–62. doi:10.1177/0956797612449177. PMID 23228937.
  7. "How to have better political conversations". TED.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  8. Ehrenfreund, Max (May 13, 2016). "How psychologists used these doctored Obama photos to get white people to support conservative politics". Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via www.washingtonpost.com.
  9. "Current Research in Social Psychology" (PDF). Wix.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  10. "American Journal of Sociology" (PDF). wix.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  11. "Stronger reaction to masculinity threats tied to testosterone, Stanford sociologist says". Stanford.edu. April 16, 2013. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  12. "The coolest professors at Berkeley, according to the Golden Apple Awards - The Daily Californian". dailycal.org. March 11, 2013. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  13. "Some male egos need extra traction". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  14. "Gossip may have social purpose, study says". cnn.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  15. League, Levo. "How can getting embarrassed help get you ahead?". forbes.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  16. Feigelson, Josh (June 28, 2017). "We The People, and We, Our Media". huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  17. Craven, Julia; Grim, Ryan (May 6, 2016). "Here's Actual Evidence That Racial Fear Benefits The Tea Party (And Probably Trump)". Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via Huff Post.
  18. Healy, Melissa (November 23, 2015). "Income inequality makes the rich more Scrooge-like, study finds". Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via LA Times.
  19. Kaplan, Matt (January 4, 2011). "Why dire climate warnings boost scepticism". Nature News. doi:10.1038/news.2011.701. Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via www.nature.com.
  20. "Atheists more compassionate than religious: study". nydailynews.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  21. "How Conservatives Can Sway Liberals, and Vice Versa". nymag.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  22. "Psychologists Are Learning How to Convince Conservatives to Take Climate Change Seriously". nymag.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  23. "How to Win Your Next Political Argument". nymag.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  24. "Is Arguing With Passion The Most Effective Way To Persuade Opponents?". npr.org. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  25. "Economic Inequality Dampens the Generosity of the Wealthy". psmag.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  26. "How to Convince Men to Help the Poor". psmag.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  27. "How Gossip Serves a Greater Good". psmag.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  28. "How to talk to a conservative about climate change". salon.com. July 30, 2013. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  29. "Embarrassment seen as a sign of many virtues". sfgate.com. November 4, 2011. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  30. "Research shows generosity repaid on many levels". sfgate.com. December 24, 2010. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  31. "How To Sell Humvees To Men". sciencemag.org. August 4, 2005. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  32. American, Scientific. "Is Climate Change Too Scary?". scientificamerican.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  33. Friedersdorf, Conor (June 27, 2017). "Working Toward the Same Ends for Different Reasons". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  34. Calamur, Krishnadev (April 21, 2017). "Does Terrorism Sway Elections?". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  35. Khazan, Olga (February 27, 2017). "What Makes a Protest Effective". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  36. Khazan, Olga (February 2017). "The Simple Trick to Getting People to Support Refugees, Immigrants, and Obamacare". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  37. Thompson, Derek (May 13, 2016). "Donald Trump and the Twilight of White America". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  38. Beck, Julie (November 6, 2014). "Have You Heard? Gossip Is Actually Good and Useful". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  39. McElwee, Sean (April 18, 2014). "How to Tap Latent Conservative Support for Climate-Change Policy". theatlantic.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  40. Furness, Hannah (April 26, 2013). "Greed is no longer good, study finds". Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via www.telegraph.co.uk.
  41. Gross, Neil (June 16, 2017). "Opinion - Does Trump Embarrass You?". The New York Times. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  42. Nuwer, Rachel (December 17, 2012). "What's Your Meme? Changing the Climate Change Conversation". nytimes.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  43. "Studies Find That Gossip Isn't Just Loose Talk". The New York Times. June 16, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  44. Revkin, Andrew C. (November 18, 2010). "An Inconvenient Mind". nytimes.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  45. Song, Sora. "The Upside of Gossip: Social and Psychological Benefits". Time. Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via healthland.time.com.
  46. "USATODAY.com - Feds mum on pre-election terror threat". usatoday30.usatoday.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  47. "USATODAY.com - Voters will find their way". usatoday30.usatoday.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  48. "7 psychological concepts that explain the Trump era of politics". vox.com. March 20, 2017. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  49. "Most people are bad at arguing. These 2 techniques will make you better". vox.com. November 23, 2016. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  50. Shea, Christopher (May 3, 2012). "Atheistic Compassion". wsj.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  51. Shea, Christopher (January 21, 2012). "Week in Ideas: Christopher Shea". Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via online.wsj.com.
  52. Ehrenfreund, Max (May 13, 2016). "How psychologists used these doctored Obama photos to get white people to support conservative politics". Retrieved October 5, 2017 – via www.washingtonpost.com.
  53. Juliet Eilperin. "Gloom and doom on climate can backfire, new study says". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
  54. "Will Terror Alert Level Show Its True Colors?". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved October 5, 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.