Rheumaptera

Rheumaptera is a genus of moths of the family Geometridae erected by Jacob Hübner in 1822.

Rheumaptera
Rheumaptera hastata
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Subfamily:
Tribe:
Genus:
Rheumaptera

Hübner, 1822
Synonyms
  • Coryphista Hulst, 1896
  • Eutriphosa Gumppenberg, 1887
  • Hydria Hübner, 1822

Selected species

  • Rheumaptera acutata D. Y. Xue & F. Meng, 1992
  • Rheumaptera affinis D. Y. Xue & F. Meng, 1992
  • Rheumaptera caucasica (Müller & Viidalepp)
  • Rheumaptera cervinalis (Scopoli, 1763)
  • Rheumaptera exacta (Butler, 1882)
  • Rheumaptera flavipes Ménétriés, 1858
  • Rheumaptera fuegata (Staudinger, 1899)
  • Rheumaptera gudarica Dufay, 1983
  • Rheumaptera hastata (Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Rheumaptera hecate (Butler, 1878)
  • Rheumaptera hedemannaria Oberthür, 1880</s
  • Rheumaptera hyrcana Staudinger, 1871
  • Rheumaptera inanata Christoph, 1880
  • Rheumaptera instabilis Alphéraky, 1883
  • Rheumaptera ithys (L. B. Prout, 1937)
  • Rheumaptera latifasciaria Leech, 1891
  • Rheumaptera montivagata (Duponchel, 1830)
  • Rheumaptera moscardonica Laever, 1983
  • Rheumaptera neocervinalis Inoue, 1982
  • Rheumaptera prunivorata Ferguson, 1955
  • Rheumaptera ravulata Staudinger, 1892
  • Rheumaptera scotaria (Hampson 1907)
  • Rheumaptera subhastata (Nolcken, 1870)
  • Rheumaptera turkmenica (Müller & Viidalepp)
  • Rheumaptera undulata (Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Rheumaptera veternata Christoph, 1880
gollark: Regardless of what choice you make, the contents of the boxes are fixed, thus pick mildly more money. This probably sounds unsmart to you, which is either because you (and the server generally) are/is right, or because you fell into one side and now think it's obvious.
gollark: As I said, in general apparently both sides are split pretty evenly, have fairly convincing arguments each way, and both think that their answer is obvious and the other is wrong.
gollark: Perhaps we are HIGHLY smart unlike random internet people and OBVIOUSLY picked the correct® answer, or perhaps we just hold similar philosophical/intellectual/whatever views which make us more inclined to one-box.
gollark: I mean, maybe the average internet rabble is just bad at understanding what "perfect prediction" means, but you could probably argue that it's "rational" at the time of choosing to take both, even if it's... acausally...? worse for you. Nobody here appears to have.
gollark: It's paradoxical because it breaks decision theories somewhat.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.