Revolutions in Mathematics

Revolutions in Mathematics is a collection of essays in the history and philosophy of mathematics.

Contents
  • Michael J. Crowe, Ten "laws" concerning patterns of change in the history of mathematics (1975) (15–20);
  • Herbert Mehrtens, T. S. Kuhn's theories and mathematics: a discussion paper on the "new historiography" of mathematics (1976) (21–41);
  • Herbert Mehrtens, Appendix (1992): revolutions reconsidered (42–48);
  • Joseph Dauben, Conceptual revolutions and the history of mathematics: two studies in the growth of knowledge (1984) (49–71);
  • Joseph Dauben, Appendix (1992): revolutions revisited (72–82);
  • Paolo Mancosu, Descartes's Géométrie and revolutions in mathematics (83–116);
  • Emily Grosholz, Was Leibniz a mathematical revolutionary? (117–133);
  • Giulio Giorello, The "fine structure" of mathematical revolutions: metaphysics, legitimacy, and rigour. The case of the calculus from Newton to Berkeley and Maclaurin (134–168);
  • Yu Xin Zheng, Non-Euclidean geometry and revolutions in mathematics (169–182);
  • Luciano Boi, The "revolution" in the geometrical vision of space in the nineteenth century, and the hermeneutical epistemology of mathematics (183–208);
  • Caroline Dunmore, Meta-level revolutions in mathematics (209–225);
  • Jeremy Gray, The nineteenth-century revolution in mathematical ontology (226–248);
  • Herbert Breger, A restoration that failed: Paul Finsler's theory of sets (249–264);
  • Donald A. Gillies, The Fregean revolution in logic (265–305);
  • Michael Crowe, Afterword (1992): a revolution in the historiography of mathematics? (306–316).

Reviews

The book was reviewed by Pierre Kerszberg for Mathematical Reviews and by Michael S. Mahoney for American Mathematical Monthly. Mahoney says "The title should have a question mark." He sets the context by referring to paradigm shifts that characterize scientific revolutions as described by Thomas Kuhn in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. According to Michael Crowe in chapter one, revolutions never occur in mathematics. Mahoney explains how mathematics grows upon itself and does not discard earlier gains in understanding with new ones, such as happens in biology, physics, or other sciences. A nuanced version of revolution in mathematics is described by Caroline Dunmore who sees change at the level of "meta-mathematical values of the community that define the telos and methods of the subject, and encapsulate general beliefs about its value." On the other hand, reaction to innovation in mathematics is noted, resulting in "clashes of intellectual and social values".

gollark: Our defense is defended by defensive defence arrays.
gollark: Well, that would make absolutely no sense, since a "wire" isn't an atomic unit, but a bunch of copper/whatever atoms in a cylinder.
gollark: Our defence systems use a variant of space-filling curves to occupy all space in all dimensions in all GTech™ facilities simultaneously.
gollark: Ah, so the be doesn't realize the inevitability of failure, I *see*.
gollark: The defense systems would immediately shunt you into a decoy universe.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.