Resource selection function

Resource selection functions (RSFs) are a class of functions that are used in spatial ecology to assess which habitat characteristics are important to a specific population or species of animal, by assessing the a probability of that animal using a certain resource proportional to the availability of that resource in the environment.[1]

Modeling

Resource Selection Functions require two types of data: location information for the wildlife in question, and data on the resources available across the study area. Resources can include a broad range of environmental and geographical variables, including categorical variables such as land cover type, or continuous variables such as average rainfall over a given time period. A variety of methods are used for modeling RSFs, with logistic regression being commonly used.[2]

RSFs can be fit to data where animal presence is known, but absence is not, such as for species where several individuals within a study area are fitted with a GPS collar, but some individuals may be present without collars. When this is the case, buffers of various distances are generated around known presence points, with a number of available points generated within each buffer, which represent areas where the animal could have been, but it is unknown whether they actually were.[3] These models can be fit using binomial generalized linear models or binomial generalized linear mixed models, with the resources, or environmental and geographic data, as explanatory variables.

Scale

Resource selection functions can be modeled at a variety of spatial scales, depending on the species and the scientific question being studied. (insert one more sentence on scale)

Most RSFs address one of the following scales, which were defined by Douglas Johnson in 1980 and are still used today:[4]

  • First order selection: The entire range of a species
  • Second order selection: The home range of an individual or group of animals
  • Third order selection: Resource or habitat usage within an individual's or group's home range
  • Fourth order selection: The procurement of specific resources, such as food, at specific sites
gollark: I know roughly how the training process works. I just dispute that it can't lead to "intelligence" of some kind.
gollark: And possibly about uses for it.
gollark: Also, how do you know language models don't "know" in some sense that arithmetic is about mathematics? Probably if you mention arithmetic they'll predict somewhat more mathy words afterward.
gollark: Although I do have Codex access if you want me to run some programming tasks past it.
gollark: I don't have access any more, sadly, since my free trial ran out.

References
  1. Boyce, Mark S; Vernier, Pierre R; Nielsen, Scott E; Schmiegelow, Fiona K. A (2002-11-30). "Evaluating resource selection functions". Ecological Modelling. 157 (2–3): 281–300. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.471.8823. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4.
  2. Manly, B. F.; McDonald, L.; Thomas, Dana; McDonald, Trent L.; Erickson, Wallace P. (2007-05-08). Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9780306481512.
  3. Johnson, Chris J.; Nielsen, Scott E.; Merrill, Evelyn H.; Mcdonald, Trent L.; Boyce, Mark S. (2006-04-01). "Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods". Journal of Wildlife Management. 70 (2): 347–357. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[347:RSFBOU]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0022-541X.
  4. Johnson, Douglas H. (1980-02-01). "The Comparison of Usage and Availability Measurements for Evaluating Resource Preference". Ecology. 61 (1): 65–71. doi:10.2307/1937156. ISSN 1939-9170. JSTOR 1937156.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.