Resolution inference

In propositional logic, a resolution inference is an instance of the following rule:[1]

We call:

  • The clauses and are the inference’s premises
  • (the resolvent of the premises) is its conclusion.
  • The literal is the left resolved literal,
  • The literal is the right resolved literal,
  • is the resolved atom or pivot.

This rule can be generalized to first-order logic to:[2]

where is a most general unifier of and and and have no common variables.

Example

The clauses and can apply this rule with as unifier.

Here x is a variable and b is a constant.

Here we see that

  • The clauses and are the inference’s premises
  • (the resolvent of the premises) is its conclusion.
  • The literal is the left resolved literal,
  • The literal is the right resolved literal,
  • is the resolved atom or pivot.
  • is the most general unifier of the resolved literals.

Notes

  1. Fontaine, Pascal; Merz, Stephan; Woltzenlogel Paleo, Bruno. Compression of Propositional Resolution Proofs via Partial Regularization. 23rd International Conference on Automated Deduction, 2011.
  2. Enrique P. Arís, Juan L. González y Fernando M. Rubio, Lógica Computacional, Thomson, (2005).
gollark: I guess.
gollark: No, I mean pick both options and see what it generates afterward.
gollark: I would try this if I had GPT-3 access still, which I do not, since *apparently* the free trial credits aren't valid forever.
gollark: You could prompt it with something like "Cats [should/shouldn't] be allowed to live outside because" and compare the answers.
gollark: I don't know, it just doesn't seem like a very natural way it'd be written in practice.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.