Resolution inference
In propositional logic, a resolution inference is an instance of the following rule:[1]
We call:
- The clauses and are the inference’s premises
- (the resolvent of the premises) is its conclusion.
- The literal is the left resolved literal,
- The literal is the right resolved literal,
- is the resolved atom or pivot.
This rule can be generalized to first-order logic to:[2]
where is a most general unifier of and and and have no common variables.
Example
The clauses and can apply this rule with as unifier.
Here x is a variable and b is a constant.
Here we see that
- The clauses and are the inference’s premises
- (the resolvent of the premises) is its conclusion.
- The literal is the left resolved literal,
- The literal is the right resolved literal,
- is the resolved atom or pivot.
- is the most general unifier of the resolved literals.
Notes
- Fontaine, Pascal; Merz, Stephan; Woltzenlogel Paleo, Bruno. Compression of Propositional Resolution Proofs via Partial Regularization. 23rd International Conference on Automated Deduction, 2011.
- Enrique P. Arís, Juan L. González y Fernando M. Rubio, Lógica Computacional, Thomson, (2005).
gollark: I guess.
gollark: No, I mean pick both options and see what it generates afterward.
gollark: I would try this if I had GPT-3 access still, which I do not, since *apparently* the free trial credits aren't valid forever.
gollark: You could prompt it with something like "Cats [should/shouldn't] be allowed to live outside because" and compare the answers.
gollark: I don't know, it just doesn't seem like a very natural way it'd be written in practice.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.