Rescission bill

A rescission bill is a type of bill in the United States that rescinds funding that was previously included in an appropriations bill. Rescission bills proposed by the President of the United States are considered under an expedited process that cannot be filibustered in the Senate, allowing it to pass with 51 votes instead of 60. The procedure was introduced in 1974 as a replacement for impoundment. It was widely used between its introduction and 2000, but then fell into disuse until 2018.

Procedure

The rescission process is described in 2 U.S.C. ch. 17B, subch. II. The process begins with the president submitting a rescission proposal to the House Committee on Appropriations and Senate Committee on Appropriations. Each committee has 25 days to approve or disapprove the proposal; if a committee takes no action the bill becomes subject to a discharge petition. Each House considers the bill under an expedited procedure that does not allow a filibuster in the Senate. The bill must be passed within 45 days after the original proposal to be enacted, and the budget authority is delayed during these 45 days.[1][2]

In practice, rescission proposals have usually been incorporated into larger appropriations bills considered through the normal process rather than passed as standalone bills using the expedited process.[3] In addition to the presidential rescission procedure, Congress may initiate rescissions as part of a normal appropriations bill.[4][5]

History

The rescission process was instituted by the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. It was replacement for the broad impoundment authority that was removed by the bill. The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987 prohibited repeatedly submitting identical or similar rescission proposals to extend the 45-day window for delaying the budget authority.[3]

Between 1974 and 2000, presidents submitted 1178 rescission proposals totaling $76 billion, of which Congress accepted 461 totaling $25 billion.[4] The last presidential rescission proposal was made for fiscal year 2000 during the Clinton administration.[3] No presidential rescission proposals were requested during the presidencies of George W. Bush or of Barack Obama,[1][4] although George W. Bush proposed "cancellations" of funding in the 2007 federal budget through a message that did not use the formal presidential rescission procedure.[3]

In April 2018, President Donald Trump announced his intention to develop a rescission proposal in response to the large funding increases contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, which had passed the previous month.[6][7] The proposal was scaled back, however, after pushback by Congressional leadership to include $15 billion in rescissions mainly targeting funds that were already unspent. In June 2018, the bill, the Spending Cuts to Expired and Unnecessary Programs Act (H.R. 3), passed the House 210–206 but failed in the Senate 48–50.[8][9]

gollark: Which one?
gollark: There are lots of valid somewhat different ways to do base32 encoding, yes.
gollark: I mean, boring algorithmically.
gollark: There were lots of ways for matrix multiplication, but almost everyone did it boringly too.
gollark: Well, they pass the test cases, so yes.

References
  1. Hoagland, Bill (2018-04-10). "Rescission, What's That?". Bipartisan Policy Center. Retrieved 2018-04-12.
  2. 2 U.S.C. § 688
  3. McMurty, Virginia A. (2008-03-14). "Rescission Actions Since 1974: Review and Assessment of the Record". U.S. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 2018-04-11.
  4. "Impoundment Control Act: Use and Impact of Rescission Procedures". U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2009-12-16. Retrieved 2018-04-11.
  5. Tollestrup, Jessica (2015-09-02). "Across-the-Board Rescissions in Appropriations Acts: Overview and Recent Practices" (PDF). U.S. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 2018-04-11.
  6. Bresnahan, John; Everett, Burgess (2018-04-03). "Trump, McCarthy look to cut billions from budget deal they just passed". Politico. Retrieved 2018-04-12.
  7. DeBonis, Mike (2018-04-09). "Key Senate Republicans warn White House against pursuing spending cuts". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2018-04-12.
  8. Bryan, Bob (2018-05-08). "Trump is attempting to use an obscure tactic to cut $15 billion from programs — including children's health insurance". Business Insider. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
  9. Cam, Orhan (2018-06-20). "Senate Rejects Bill to Rescind $15 Billion From Federal Agencies". Government Executive. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.