Recusatio

A recusatio is a poem (or part thereof) in which the poet says he is supposedly unable or disinclined to write the type of poem which he originally intended to, and instead writes in a different style.

The recusatio is something of a topos in ancient and Renaissance literature.[1] Its use has often been interpreted as a persona deliberately adopted by the poet, allowing him to assert himself in the guise of ironic self-deprecation or feigned humility.[2]

Ancient Greek origins

The topos of recusatio was introduced by Callimachus in his Aetia fr. 1.21-4,[3] and employed in his refusal to write a major epic, preferring slighter poetic forms.[4] Anacreon’s work contains many similar examples.[5]

Examples from Latin Literature

In Augustan Rome, pressure to write an epic celebration of the emperor’s achievement was felt by almost all poets. Virgil in his Eclogue VI.3ff offered an exemplary recusatio,[6] which at the same time held out the prospect of his ‘advancing’ to epic in the fullness of time.[7] By contrast Propertius (I. 7ff; II.34 lines 59-66; III.3 lines 39ff) and Horace (Ode I.6; Ode II.12) made more permanent objections;[8] while Ovid (Amores I.1; II.18 ) also presented himself as an elegist unable to reach to the heights of traditional epic.[9]

In the Silver Age, recusatio was used by poets to write epics but to avoid the subject of emperors themselves by disclaiming their ability to write of imperial deeds.[10] The third century AD saw recusatio employed again by Nemesianus in his Cynegetica (lines 15 - 47)[11]

Early modern/Postmodern
  • Bob Dylan placed himself in the elegist tradition of recusation in his song Blind Willie McTell, with its refrain’s self-contradictory claim that “nobody can sing the blues like Blind Willie McTell”.[13]
gollark: Possibly Java.
gollark: Worst practical, you say…
gollark: How about "I wish for the concept of killing me to be substituted for the concept of giving me £100000 within the minds of all genies or other entities capable of effectively granting wishes".
gollark: You never specified that. No changey ruley.
gollark: Immortality for everyone (subject to the usual fixes to issues the genie might add, I can probably pull those from the open source wish project).

See also

References
  1. P Cheney, Marlowe’s Counterfeit Profession (London 1997) p. 278
  2. G D Williams, Banished Voices (Cambridge 1994) p. 33
  3. L Smolenaas, Flavian Poetry (2006) p. 21
  4. J Boardman ed, The Oxford History of the Classical World (Oxford 1991) p. 361-2
  5. See Rosenmeyer, P. (1992) Poetics of Imitation p. 96ff.
  6. Thomas, R (1985) From Recusatio to Commitment PLLS 5 (1985), p. 61
  7. P Cheney, Marlowe’s Counterfeit Profession' (London 1997) p. 74
  8. J Boardman ed, The Oxford History of the Classical World (Oxford 1991) p. 600-4
  9. G D Williams, Banished Voices (Cambridge 1994) p. 33 and p. 196
  10. L Smolenaas, Flavian Poetry (2006) p. 28
  11. See Jakobi, R. (2014) Nemesianus >Cynegetica< Edition und Kommentar, p.66; Conte, G.B. (trans Solodow) (1994), Latin Literature:A History, p. 613
  12. P Cheney, Marlowe’s Counterfeit Profession (London 1997) p. 33 and 74
  13. Quoted in N. Corcoran ed., Do You, Mr Jones? (London 2002) p. 215


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.