R v Woodrow
Regina v. Woodrow, 15 M. & W. 404 (Exch. 1846) was a case decided by the English Court of Exchequer Chamber that first adopted a strict liability standard for the criminal offence of selling impure foods.[1]
Decision
The defendant was charged with violating a statute that prohibited possession of adulterated tobacco. The court held the defendant criminally liable even though he had no knowledge or reason to suspect the adulteration. The court justified this adoption of strict liability as being in the interests of convenient prosecution.[2]
This decision overruled Rex v. Dixon, which had included a mens rea requirement.[3]
gollark: Well, I'm not, see.
gollark: If I'm on a connection that high latency I can just use mosh, which does some magic to compensate for it on the client, and continue using nano.
gollark: I heard about a project using a USB/VGA adapter as a bad transmit-only SDR.
gollark: Hello, would you like to hear a TCP joke?Yes, I'd like to hear a TCP joke.OK, I'll tell you a TCP joke.OK, I'll hear a TCP joke.Are you ready to hear a TCP joke?Yes, I am ready to hear a TCP joke.OK, I'm about to send the TCP joke. It will last 10 seconds, it has two characters, it does not have a setting, it ends with a punchline.OK, I'm ready to hear the TCP joke that will last 10 seconds, has two characters, does not have a setting and will end with a punchline.I'm sorry, your connection has timed out... ...Hello, would you like to hear a TCP joke?
gollark: Actually, for Ryzen it has a significant performance impact because the DRAM speed controls the infinity fabric speed.
References
- Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2004, p. 252
- Bonnie, p. 252
- Bonnie, p. 252
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.