Nobilissimus

Nobilissimus (Latin for "most noble"), in Byzantine Greek nōbelissimos (Greek: νωβελίσσιμος),[1] was one of the highest imperial titles in the late Roman and Byzantine empires. The feminine form of the title was nobilissima.

Coin of Licinius II c. 315 – c. 326, the inscription "LICINIUS IUNior NOBilissimus CAESar" translates as 'Licinius Junior Most Noble Caesar'

History and functions
"Prōtonōbelissimos" from the codicil of the Sicilian admiral Christodulus

The term nobilissimus originated as an epithet to the title of Caesar, whose holder was the Roman and Byzantine emperor's heir-apparent and who would, after Geta in 198, be addressed nobilissimus Caesar.[2] According to the historian Zosimus, Emperor Constantine the Great (r. 306–337) first created the nobilissimus into a separate dignity,[1] so as to honour some of his relatives without implying a claim to the imperial throne. The title thus came to be awarded to members of the imperial family, coming in rank immediately after that of Caesar, and remained so throughout the early and middle Byzantine period, until the mid-11th century.[1] In the Klētorologion of Philotheos, written in 899, the rank's insignia are described as a purple tunic, mantle and belt, indicating the exalted position of its holder. Their award by the emperor in a special ceremony signified the elevation of the recipient to the office.[3]

From the late 11th century, the title was given to senior army commanders, the future Byzantine emperor Alexios Komnenos being the first to be thus honoured.[1] The inflation of its holders during the Komnenian period led to its devaluation, and the new titles of prōtonōbelissimos (πρωτονωβελίσσιμος, "first nobilissimus") and prōtonōbelissimohypertatos (πρωτονωβελισσιμοϋπέρτατος, "supreme first nobilissimus") were created in the 12th century.[1]

Nobilissimi
gollark: > there are examples of discriminationOnly against bad things, like LyricLy.> code formatting issuesMy code is formatted in accordance with the standard.> in the past there have been, well I'll go as far as to say that there have been bugsNope. These are features.
gollark: If ABR is nongood, this must mean it has nongood attributes of some sort, but it doesn't, so you're wrong.
gollark: Wrong.
gollark: <@319753218592866315> Anything to say about my flawless logic?
gollark: If AutoBotRobot was nongood, it wouldn't have features. But it has features, so it is not nongood.

References
  1. Kazhdan 1991, pp. 1489–1490.
  2. Mitthof 1993, pp. 97–111.
  3. Bury 1911, p. 22.

Sources
  • Bury, John Bagnell (1911). The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century - With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos. London: Oxford University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Kazhdan, Alexander (1991). "Nobelissimos". In Kazhdan, Alexander (ed.). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1489–1490. ISBN 0-19-504652-8.
  • Mitthof, Fritz (1993). "Vom ἱερώτατος Καίσαρ zum ἐπιφανέστατος Καίσαρ. Die Ehrenprädikate in der Titulatur der Thronfolger des 3. Jh. n. Chr. nach den Papyri" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik (in German). Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH. 99: 97–111.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.