Prime Obsession

Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics (2003) is a historical book on mathematics by John Derbyshire, detailing the history of the Riemann hypothesis, named for Bernhard Riemann, and some of its applications.

Prime Obsession
Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics by John Derbyshire
AuthorJohn Derbyshire
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SubjectMathematics, History of science
GenrePopular science
PublisherJoseph Henry Press
Publication date
2003
Pages442
ISBN0-309-08549-7

The book was awarded the Mathematical Association of America's inaugural Euler Book Prize in 2007.[1]

Overview

The book is written such that even-numbered chapters present historical elements related to the development of the conjecture, and odd-numbered chapters deal with the mathematical and technical aspects.[2] Despite the title, the book provides biographical information on many iconic mathematicians including Euler, Gauss, and Lagrange.[3]

In chapter 1, "Card Trick", Derbyshire introduces the idea of an infinite series and the ideas of convergence and divergence of these series. He imagines that there is a deck of cards stacked neatly together, and that one pulls off the top card so that it overhangs from the deck. Explaining that it can overhang only as far as the center of gravity allows, the card is pulled so that exactly half of it is overhanging. Then, without moving the top card, he slides the second card so that it is overhanging too at equilibrium. As he does this more and more, the fractional amount of overhanging cards as they accumulate becomes less and less. He explores various types of series such as the harmonic series.

In chapter 2, Bernhard Riemann is introduced and a brief historical account of Eastern Europe in the 18th Century is discussed.

In chapter 3, the Prime Number Theorem (PNT) is introduced. The function which mathematicians use to describe the number of primes in N numbers, π(N), is shown to behave in a logarithmic manner, as so:

where log is the natural logarithm. In chapter 5, the Riemann Zeta Function is introduced:

In chapter 4, Derbyshire gives a short biographical history of Carl Friedrich Gauss and Leonard Euler, setting up their involvement in the Prime Number Theorem.

In chapter 7, the sieve of Eratosthenes is shown to be able to be simulated using the Zeta function. With this, the following statement which becomes the pillar stone of the book is asserted:

Following the derivation of this finding, the book delves into how this is manipulated to expose the PNT's nature.

Audience and reception

According to reviewer S. W. Graham, the book is written at a level that is suitable for advanced undergraduate students of mathematics.[3] In contrast, James V. Rauff recommends it to "anyone interested in the history and mathematics of the Riemann hypothesis".[4]

Reviewer Don Redmond writes that, while the even-numbered chapters explain the history well, the odd-numbered chapters present the mathematics too informally to be useful, failing to provide insight to readers who do not already understand the mathematics, and failing even to explain the importance of the Riemann hypothesis.[2] Graham adds that the level of mathematics is inconsistent, with detailed explanations of basics and sketchier explanations of material that is more advanced. But for those who do already understand the mathematics, he calls the book "a familiar story entertainingly told".[3]

Notes

  1. "The Mathematical Association of America's Euler Book Prize". Retrieved 2007-03-28.
  2. Redmond, Don (2004). "Review of Prime Obsession". Mathematical Reviews. MR 1968857.
  3. Graham, S. W. (August 2003). "Review of Prime Obsession". MAA Reviews.
  4. Rauff, James V. (April 2004). "Review of Prime Obsession". The Mathematics Teacher. 97 (4): 301–302. JSTOR 20871596.
gollark: That would be acceptable.
gollark: If I can make lyricly demote me *now*, I don't have to worry about the review!
gollark: I didn't write rule 7.
gollark: Well, that means I don't feel worried deleting your messages, see.
gollark: > 7. Judgement on whether you have broken a rule and the fitting punishment are at the discretion of the staff members with the authority to give out those punishments.So I can randomly judge *anything* as breaking a rule since I have the authority to delete things.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.