Post-racial America

Post-racial United States is a theoretical environment in which the United States is free from racial preference, discrimination, and prejudice.

Origins of the term

One of the earliest uses of the term "post-racial" to describe the United States was in an October 5, 1971, article in The New York Times titled "Compact Set Up for 'Post-Racial' South".[1] The article reported the establishment of a "Southern Growth Policies Board" in Durham, North Carolina, "by some 70 politicians and professors who believe their region of 60 million citizens has entered an era in which race relations are soon to be replaced as a major concern by population increase, industrial development, and economic fluctuations".[1]

2008 presidential election
President Barack Obama

Some Americans saw the presidential candidacy of Barack Obama, and his election in 2008 as the first black president of the United States, as a sign that the nation had, in fact, become post-racial.[2][3] The conservative radio host Lou Dobbs, for example, said in November 2009, "We are now in a 21st-century post-partisan, post-racial society."[4] Two months later, Chris Matthews, an MSNBC host, said of President Obama, "He is post-racial by all appearances. You know, I forgot he was black tonight for an hour."[5]

However, public opinion on whether the United States is post-racial is itself divided starkly by race. In a Washington Post/ABC News poll conducted in December 2014, about 50% of white respondents said they believed that the justice system treats Americans of all races equally, but only 10% of African-Americans said the same.[6] In the spring of 2015, according to a Gallup poll, 13% of black Americans surveyed identified race relations as the most important problem the United States faces, compared with 4% of white Americans.[7]

Arguments that the United States is not post-racial frequently emphasize the treatment of African-Americans and other racial minorities in the criminal justice system and in interactions with the police. Killings of unarmed African-Americans, often by police officers, have been widely publicized. In 2015, according to a study by The Guardian, police officers in the United States killed 7.13 black Americans per million, compared with 2.91 white Americans per million.[8] Additionally:

Young black men were nine times more likely than other Americans to be killed by police officers in 2015, according to the findings of a Guardian study that recorded a final tally of 1,134 deaths at the hands of law enforcement officers this year. Despite making up only 2% of the total US population, African American males between the ages of 15 and 34 comprised more than 15% of all deaths logged this year by an ongoing investigation into the use of deadly force by police. Their rate of police-involved deaths was five times higher than for white men of the same age.[9]

Such killings had a marked effect on public perceptions of race relations in America. The 13 percent of black Americans who called race relations the most pressing problem in the United States in the spring 2015 Gallup poll dwarfed the 3 percent that Gallup reported at the beginning of 2014.[7] And the percentage of white Americans who said race relations were the most important issue rose to 4 percent in 2015 from 1 percent in 2014.[7]

In response to high-profile incidents such as the fatal shootings of Michael Brown, Aiyana Jones, Trayvon Martin, Laquan McDonald, Tamir Rice, and Walter Scott, and the death of Freddie Gray from a spinal-cord injury sustained in police custody, academics[3] and journalists[10] have denounced claims that America is post-racial. Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote in The Atlantic in 2015 that the phrase "post-racial" was "usually employed by talk-show hosts and news anchors looking to measure progress in the Obama era."[10] And Anna Holmes wrote in The New York Times, "Chattel slavery and the legacies it left behind continue to shape American society. Sometimes it seems as if the desire for a 'post-racial' America is an attempt by white people to liberate themselves from the burden of having to deal with that legacy."[11]

Black Lives Matter protester

However, others argue that post-racial politics champions aggressive action to deliver economic opportunity and weed out police misconduct, without the divisive framing of racial identity. Under this view, there is no claim that America has attained a fully post-racial society, however it is argued that news selection is skewed toward amplifying racial conflict, events demonstrating racial harmony are dismissed as non-newsworthy, and that such media conflict-bias acts to undermine trust and impede progress. Rather, any true measure of race relations must gauge the everyday daily experiences of Americans in interacting with people of differing backgrounds. An assumption is that the media will cherry-pick the most outrageous, racially-inflammatory events to cover no matter how infrequently they are occurring, and thus misreport progress toward a post-racial ideal. The central tenet of post-racial problem-solving practice is to seek the "alternative explanation" when conflict arises (presuming non-racist motives in others), in order to find common ground and creatively resolve the conflict. Examples of post-racial framing in attacking misconduct by the criminal justice system are video recording of all police-citizen interactions, creating a Citizens Review Board with investigative powers, and assigning an independent prosecutor. Or, in the educational sphere, creating charters, academies and school choice to turn around under-performing schools. The divide in public opinion on the status of race in America was reflected in reactions to the Black Lives Matter movement. In response to the "black lives matter" rallying cry, some people, including politicians, began using the phrase "all lives matter".[12][13][14] After a sheriff's deputy in Harris County, Texas, was fatally shot while pumping gas in August,[15] Sheriff Ron Hickman claimed that the rhetoric of Black Lives Matter activists had contributed to the killing and said, "We've heard 'black lives matter'. All lives matter. Well, cops' lives matter, too. So why don't we just drop the qualifier and just say 'lives matter', and take that to the bank.'[16]

Detroit, Michigan: Caucasians in red, African-Americans in blue, Hispanics in orange, and Asians in green. A dot represents 25 people.

Supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement criticized the "all lives matter" phrase, arguing that it minimized the systemic threats faced by African-Americans.[17][18][19][20] President Obama said in October, "There is a specific problem that is happening in the African-American community that's not happening in other communities."[21] Andrew Rosenthal wrote, similarly, in The New York Times, "The point of 'Black Lives Matter' is that the lives of African-Americans have come under special and deadly threat since before the birth of this country."[22]

Evidence of continued racial divisions in the United States can also be found in demographics. For instance, African-Americans account for less than 15 percent of the total population of Michigan, but more than 82 percent of the population of the state's largest city, Detroit[23] — and Detroit, like many cities whose residents are predominantly black, has "resegregated schools, dwindling tax bases and decaying public services".[24]

There is a similar dynamic in Louisiana; the state was about 64 percent white as of the 2010 Census,[25] but its largest city, New Orleans, is 60 percent black.[26] Further segregation can be found within New Orleans: the Lower Ninth Ward, for example, is 97 percent black.[27] This was the neighborhood that experienced the most catastrophic flooding after Hurricane Katrina, and the government's response to the disaster has been cited as evidence of the continued presence of racism in the United States.[28][29] Most of the victims were black and poor, and class was a major factor in who survived: Those who lived in areas better protected from flooding, and those who were able to evacuate before the storm, tended to be wealthier.[30] At the time, President George W. Bush acknowledged that this poverty had "roots in the history of racial discrimination, which cut off generations from the opportunities of America".[31]

Political implications

The idea that America is post-racial, or close to it, has played a role in at least one United States Supreme Court decision. In Shelby County v. Holder in 2013, the court invalidated a section of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that had required nine states with particularly severe histories of racial discrimination to obtain federal approval for any change to their election laws.[32] The ruling, written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., said in part, "Our country has changed." It added that in the decades since the Voting Rights Act was passed, "voting tests were abolished, disparities in voter registration and turnout due to race were erased, and African-Americans attained political office in record numbers. And yet the coverage formula that Congress reauthorized in 2006 ignores these developments, keeping the focus on decades-old data relevant to decades-old problems, rather than current data reflecting current needs."[33] Similar issues are involved[34] in Fisher v. University of Texas, a challenge to affirmative action policies on which the court ruled in 2016,[35] upholding the race-based admissions policy of the University of Texas.

gollark: ++apioform
gollark: <@625770657413857310> is the following:
gollark: If there are PCBs, are there PRustBs and PC++Bs?
gollark: Well, obviously all should be bee if this does not impair functionality.
gollark: What do you mean a "bee"? Some sort of bee silkscreen art?

See also

References
  1. Wootens, James T. (October 5, 1971). "Compact Set Up for 'Post-Racial' South" (PDF). The New York Times. Retrieved January 2, 2016.
  2. "A New, 'Post-Racial' Political Era in America". NPR.org. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  3. Dawson, Michael C.; Bobo, Lawrence D. (2009). "One Year Later and the Myth of a Post-Racial Society". Du Bois Review. 6 (2): 247. doi:10.1017/S1742058X09990282. Retrieved 2016-01-01.
  4. "Dobbs calls on listeners to rise above "partisan and racial element that dominates politics"". Media Matters for America. 2009-11-12. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  5. "MSNBC's Matthews On Obama: "I Forgot He Was Black Tonight" | RealClearPolitics". www.realclearpolitics.com. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  6. Balz, Dan; Clement, Scott (2014-12-26). "On racial issues, America is divided both black and white and red and blue". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  7. "Views of Race Relations as Top Problem Still Differ by Race". Gallup.com. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  8. "The Counted: people killed by police in the United States in 2015 – interactive". the Guardian. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  9. Swaine, Jon; Laughl, Oliver; Lartey, Jamiles; McCarthy, Ciara (2015-12-31). "Young black men killed by US police at highest rate in year of 1,134 deaths". the Guardian. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  10. "There Is No Post-Racial America". The Atlantic. 2015-06-23. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  11. Holmes, Anna (2015-06-30). "America's 'Postracial' Fantasy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  12. Rappeport, Alan (2015-06-24). "Hillary Clinton's 'All Lives Matter' Remark Stirs Backlash". The New York Times - First Draft. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  13. "Law Enforcement and the Communities We Serve: Bending the Lines Toward Safety and Justice". FBI. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  14. "Huckabee Says Civil Rights Icon Dr. King Would Be 'Appalled' By Black Lives Matter Movement". ThinkProgress. Archived from the original on 2016-06-19. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  15. Montgomery, David (2015-08-29). "Texas: Sheriff's Deputy Is Fatally Shot at Gas Station". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  16. Fernandez, Manny; Montgomery, David (2015-08-29). "Texas Deputy Killed 'Because He Wore a Uniform,' Sheriff Says". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  17. "Rep. Ellison: 'When You Say All Lives Matter - You Are Ignoring…American Racism'". CNS News. 2015-11-02. Retrieved 2016-01-03.
  18. "What's the Matter with 'All Lives Matter'". The Huffington Post. 2015-08-24. Retrieved 2016-01-03.
  19. Bry, Dave (2015-11-23). "'All lives matter' is and always was racist – the weekend's campaign rally proved it | Dave Bry". the Guardian. Retrieved 2016-01-03.
  20. "The Problem with Saying 'All Lives Matter'". RELEVANT Magazine. Retrieved 2016-01-03.
  21. "Obama Explains The Problem With 'All Lives Matter'". ThinkProgress. Archived from the original on 2016-08-05. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  22. "Mike Huckabee Misses the Point of Black Lives Matter". Taking Note. 2015-08-19. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  23. "Detroit, MI Population by Race and Ethnicity - CLRSearch". CLRSearch. Archived from the original on 2013-03-02. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  24. Sugrue, Thomas J. (2011-03-26). "A Dream Still Deferred". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  25. "Louisiana QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau". quickfacts.census.gov. Archived from the original on 2014-01-19. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  26. "New Orleans (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau". quickfacts.census.gov. Archived from the original on 2016-01-02. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  27. "Lower 9th Ward, New Orleans, LA Population & Demographics". www.areavibes.com. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  28. "Race An Issue In Katrina Response". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  29. "Katrina victims blame racism for slow aid". msnbc.com. 2005-12-07. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  30. Lavelle, Kristen (2006). "Hurricane Katrina: The Race and Class Debate". Monthly Review. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  31. "Bush Calls for Bold Plan to Rebuild Coast". NPR.org. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  32. Liptak, Adam (2013-06-25). "Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  33. Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U. S. ___ (2013). Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  34. "A Colorblind Constitution: What Abigail Fisher's Affirmative Action Case Is Really About". ProPublica. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
  35. Liptak, Adam (2015-12-09). "Supreme Court Justices' Comments Don't Bode Well for Affirmative Action". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-01-02.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.