Popoviciu's inequality

In convex analysis, Popoviciu's inequality is an inequality about convex functions. It is similar to Jensen's inequality and was found in 1965 by Tiberiu Popoviciu,[1][2] a Romanian mathematician.

Formulation

Let f be a function from an interval to . If f is convex, then for any three points x, y, z in I,

If a function f is continuous, then it is convex if and only if the above inequality holds for all x, y, z from . When f is strictly convex, the inequality is strict except for x = y = z.[3]

Generalizations

It can be generalized to any finite number n of points instead of 3, taken on the right-hand side k at a time instead of 2 at a time:[4]

Let f be a continuous function from an interval to . Then f is convex if and only if, for any integers n and k where n ≥ 3 and , and any n points from I,

Popoviciu's inequality can also be generalized to a weighted inequality.[5][6][7]

Notes

  1. Tiberiu Popoviciu (1965), "Sur certaines inégalités qui caractérisent les fonctions convexes", Analele ştiinţifice Univ. "Al.I. Cuza" Iasi, Secţia I a Mat., 11: 155–164
  2. Popoviciu's paper has been published in Romanian language, but the interested reader can find his results in the review Zbl 0166.06303. Page 1 Page 2
  3. Constantin Niculescu; Lars-Erik Persson (2006), Convex functions and their applications: a contemporary approach, Springer Science & Business, p. 12, ISBN 978-0-387-24300-9
  4. J. E. Pečarić; Frank Proschan; Yung Liang Tong (1992), Convex functions, partial orderings, and statistical applications, Academic Press, p. 171, ISBN 978-0-12-549250-8
  5. P. M. Vasić; Lj. R. Stanković (1976), "Some inequalities for convex functions", Math. Balkanica (6 (1976)), pp. 281–288
  6. Grinberg, Darij (2008). "Generalizations of Popoviciu's inequality". arXiv:0803.2958v1 [math.FA].
  7. M.Mihai; F.-C. Mitroi-Symeonidis (2016), "New extensions of Popoviciu's inequality", Mediterr. J. Math., Volume 13, 13 (5), pp. 3121–3133, arXiv:1507.05304, doi:10.1007/s00009-015-0675-3, ISSN 1660-5446
gollark: Eric's question about proportional responsibility, and what criterion do you weigh votes on?
gollark: You just introduced it for some reason.
gollark: I mean in general, not this particular case.
gollark: Do you think the electoral college does not do this?
gollark: > Because in Michigan, those particular cities usually decide the votes due to their high population. I'm going to call it "favouring rural people" if they get more voting power than they would if it was proportional to actual population.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.