Indianmeal moth

The Indianmeal moth (Plodia interpunctella), also spelled as Indian meal moth and Indian-meal moth, is a pyraloid moth of the family Pyralidae. Alternative common names are weevil moth, pantry moth, flour moth or grain moth. The almond moth (Cadra cautella) and the raisin moth (Cadra figulilella) are commonly confused with the Indian-meal moth due to similar food sources and appearance. The species was named after being noted for feeding on Indian-meal or cornmeal and it does not occur natively in India as the usage Indian mealmoth would suggest. It is also not to be confused with the Mediterranean flour moth (Ephestia kuehniella), another common pest of stored grains.

Indianmeal moth
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Lepidoptera
Family:
Pyralidae
Tribe:
Phycitini
Genus:
Plodia

Guenée, 1845
Species:
P. interpunctella
Binomial name
Plodia interpunctella
(Hübner, [1813])
Synonyms

Many, see text

P. interpunctella larvae (caterpillars) are commonly known as waxworms. It is important to note that they are not the same species as the waxworms often bred as animal feed. Rather, they are a common grain-feeding pest found around the world, consuming cereals, fruits, and similar products. Substantial efforts have been taken in the United States to control the moth's damage to grain crops.[1]

The larvae of this species have the ability to bite through plastic and cardboard; thus, even sealed containers may be infested.[2] Once found, the moths are difficult to eradicate. The last instar larvae is also able to travel long distances before pupating; thus, a given infestation site may be located a great distance from the nearest pupation site.[3] In addition to food sources, this species can reproduce and pupate on articles of clothing and any source of clothing must be inspected to prevent reinfestation.

Pantry moth life cycle, reproducing in a single cotton T-shirt inside a drawer

Distribution and habitat

Plodia interpunctella has been found on every continent in tropical habitats, excluding Antarctica.[4] Within the United States, the moth is most commonly found in Florida, where it thrives in the tropical habitat.[3] The moth lives in a wide range of conditions, making it a persistent pest. It is often found at food storage facilities worldwide, specifically in grain bins or grain storage buildings.[5]

Taxonomy and etymology

The Indian-meal moth is the only known living species of the genus Plodia. It is closely related to the genera Cadra and Ephestia, which include other pest species like E. kuehniella, also known as the "flour moth".[6][7]

The species has been described under a number of junior synonyms, which may occasionally still be found in non-entomological sources.[7]

  • Ephestia glycinivora Matsumura, 1917
  • Ephestia glycinivorella Matsumura, 1932 (unjustified emendation)
  • Plodia castaneella (Reutti, 1898)
  • Plodia glycinivora (Matsumura, 1917)
  • Plodia interpunctalis (Hübner, 1825)
  • Plodia latercula (Hampson, 1901)
  • Plodia zeae (Fitch, 1856)
  • Tinea castaneella Reutti, 1898
  • Tinea interpunctalis Hübner, 1825
  • Tinea interpunctella Hübner, [1813]
  • Tinea zeae Fitch, 1856
  • Unadilla latercula Hampson, 1901

The common name, "Indian-meal moth", for this species was coined by Asa Fitch, an entomologist employed by the state of New York in the 19th century. In a report published in 1856, Fitch discussed the species, noting that the larvae had been observed to infest stores of cornmeal, which at the time was referred to as "Indian meal".[8]

Description

Adults are 8–10 mm in length with 16–20 mm (~​3⁄4-inch) wingspans. The distal two thirds of their forewings are generally reddish brown in color with a copper luster. They can also be bronze or dark gray. The more proximal parts of the wings are yellow-gray or white-gray, with a dark band at the intersection between the proximal and distal regions. The hindwings, in general, are uniformly gray.[9]

The eggs of the Indian-meal moth are white, ovate, and very small. It is difficult to see them with the naked eye. Newly-hatched larvae are equally difficult to see. They are mostly off-white in color, have brown heads,and develop through five to seven larval instars. When these larvae mature, they measure about 12–14 mm long. Larvae also have three sets of legs near the head and five sets of prolegs protruding from the abdomen. The legs help the larvae move over long distances in order to find pupation sites.[9]

Food resources

Indian-meal moths feed on a large range of plants, grains, and other human food products.

Plant-based foods

Moths feed on many plant-based foods. These foods include dry pet food (plant based), birdseed, cereal, soup mixes, bread, pasta, rice, flour, spices, dried fruits and nuts. There is strong evidence that the northern Manitoba wheat supports the development of the moth. Other optimal diets include sultanas, American yellow corn and almonds. Groundnuts and maize meal, on the other hand, result in a longer development time for the moths.[10]

Non-plant foods

Indian-meal moths are also known to cannibalize larvae. However, this often leads to viral granulosis infections spreading through an Indian-meal moth population, though healthy larvae are picked more often than unhealthy larvae for cannibalism.[11] Typically, cannibals do not eat closely related individuals, which might share genes with them, but when given the choice between siblings and unrelated individuals, caterpillars tend to cannibalize their siblings.[12]

Foraging flights

Though Indian-meal moths generally do not migrate over long distances, they do engage in long-distance foraging flights. These flights take place during the twilight hours during which blue light (400–475 nm) rather than UV light (10–400 nm) is dominant and attracts the moths. To add to this, blue light's role in the Indian-meal moth foraging behavior has recently been developed as a form of pest control since it is attractive to the moth.[13]

Life history

Eggs

Usually, the life cycle of an Indian-meal moth colony starts in a location where grain is present. The temperature within a grain bin must exceed 50 °F (10 °C). The eggs of the moth are grayish white and have a length between 0.3 and 0.5 mm. Eggs can be laid directly on the food source either singly or in groups of between 12 and 30. A mature female may lay between 100 and 300 eggs at a time.[1]

Larvae

Larvae begin to hatch in approximately two to fourteen days. The larvae have between five and seven instars. Newly hatched larvae feed on grain while more mature larvae feed on grain germ. The larvae are an off-white color, but can be pink, brown, or greenish. They are about 12 mm long and have prolegs for movement purposes. Fully-grown larvae are able to spin webs and leave silk threads in their path of travel. Mature larvae that make silk also make threaded cocoons.[1]

Adults

The pupae are often seen on grain surfaces and on the walls of grain bins. The adults emerge in four to ten days. They then mate and the cycle begins again.[1] The entire life cycle of this species may take 30 to 300 days. A typical life cycle takes 50 days. Under optimal conditions a life cycle can be as short as 28 days but cooler winter months prohibit this from happening. There is a potential for seven to nine generations of moths to live in a year.[3][9]

Diapause

Diapause is defined as a delay in animal development due to certain external factors.[14] It can end once the adverse environmental conditions wear off. Thus, the duration of diapause varies. This kind of behavior is witnessed in Indian-meal moths. It is especially prevalent late in the breeding season. During the egg stage, if the temperature of the moth's environment exceeds 25 °C (77 °F), it can cause a delay in hatching. Additionally, in the moth's early larval stage, temperatures of below 20 °C (68 °F) can cause a similar diapause. Different strains of P. interpunctella have differing tendencies to enter diapause.[15]

  • Mating adults
  • Freshly laid eggs
  • Larva on sprinkles
  • Empty pupal case

Enemies

Predators

Parasites
  • Habrobracon hebetor is a parasitoid wasp that is commonly used in biological control. A biological control involves the use of other organisms to control pests. The gut enzymes that are released by this parasite into the Indian-meal moth larvae denature blood proteins and digest it. This, along with the larvae eating the moth, leads to its death.[16]

Diseases
  • Baculoviruses are double-stranded DNA viruses which are commonly used as biological control agents for the Indian-meal moth and are considered parasites. They come from a family of viruses that are limited to insects as hosts. Baculovirus isolates have been often isolated from other Lepidoptera. At sub-lethal dosages, baculoviruses decrease reproductive capacity in terms of egg viability and production.[17]

Immunity

Since there are regulations preventing the use of many pesticides near food sources, these pests are highly suitable for control with natural predators.[18]

Indian-meal moths are developing a resistance to many kinds of biological agents that are used such as the granulosis virus. Use of such pest control agents can cause the resistance to these agents to be selected for in populations of Indian-meal moths. In populations that were exposed to the granulosis virus, it was found that the moths were 96 times more resistant to the virus. This led to the prohibition of many such biological agents.[19]

Mating

Male-male interactions

Sperm competition

Females of the species mate multiple times, meaning sperm competition could be an important aspect of male-male competition for being reproductively successful. Additionally, males have a very limited number of sperm and therefore allocate it depending on various factors. Male Indian-meal moths ejaculate a greater amount of sperm to females that had previously mated multiple times. This is predicted to ensure a greater chance of success in sperm competition in the females' storage organs. Males also ejaculate more sperm when mating with a younger female.[20]

Food and pupation site competition

The most common type of competition in Indian-meal moths is due to a lack of sufficient food. This competition can change the timing of male and female emergence, reducing the chance of early males finding females to mate with, which could encourage emigration.[21] This is considered a form of male-male competition because the males that emerge at an appropriate time are more likely to be reproductively successful with the surrounding females.

Males are also involved in finding pupation sites. If the larvae do not find pupation sites in the food layer, they may wander long distances to find one. Though this competition to find a pupation site affects males more than it does females, it indirectly impacts them as well because it results in a delayed population of males to mate with.[21]

Female-male interactions

Female pheromones

In the Indian-meal moth, mating occurs a few days after the adult moth emerges from the silk cocoon. Mating rituals are largely limited to pheromones release by the female. There are four primary pheromones that have been identified (via mass spectrometry techniques) in the female pheromone blend: (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate, (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienal, (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienol, and (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate. The pheromone is an attractant to male Indian-meal moths. Removing any one component of the blend reduces the activity of the pheromone and the number of males attracted. Though other components of the pheromone blend are also known, their functions are unclear. It has been suggested that the reason for having so many components to the pheromone is that it ensures species specificity.[22]

Male pheromones

Male Indian-meal moths also release pheromones. After approaching the female from the back, the male releases a pheromone from wing glands which are located at the base of each forewing. These pheromones induce the female to remain stationary in the acceptance posture (raised abdomen between wings) which facilitates copulation.[23]

Copulation and multiple mating

Indian-meal moths are known to mate multiple times. For males, it is vital to ensure paternity after copulation. To ensure this trait, males who mate with a female first (before any other males) will insert a large package of spermatophore, accessory gland fluids, and nutrients into the bursa copulatrix of the female during copulation. Other donations after the first mating are smaller in size. Even so, there is no change in postcopulatory behavior in females after this large donation (with respect to pheromone production and calling behavior).[24]

Changes in fecundity

It has been observed in many insects that vital resources are tracked using odor plumes.[25] However, for the Indian-meal moth, such odors have other effects as well. The Indian-meal moth's fecundity and fertility was found to be enhanced in the presence of the odor of vital nutrients. This effect is thought to be genetic since it is not related to parental generations or previous experiences in the lifetime of the moth. Females also show a strong preference towards laying their batches of eggs near the site of the odor. It was observed that without antennae, this effect is lost, suggesting that there are olfactory receptors in the antennae.[26]

Interspecific courting

The Indian-meal moth often takes part in interspecific courtship especially with the almond moth (Cadra cautella). However, successful mating between the species does not happen due to multiple isolation mechanisms. The main mechanism that has been identified is the male sex pheromone. This pheromone is a strong species recognition signal. It allows the almond moth to differentiate between members of its own species and members of the Indian-meal moth species. There are also mechanical barriers to insemination that render the species incompatible. Their courtship behaviors are also relatively incompatible. Thus, copulation rarely occurs.[27]

Even when courtship does continue to a later stage, the female of the other species rejects the male due to the wrong pheromone being released at the wrong time from scent scales. Even with these fail safes, some male almond moths are still excited by Indian-meal moth females. They may be able to successfully copulate, but insemination is not possible.[27]

Pest status and pest control
Damage to sunflower seeds

Status

Indian-meal moth larvae can infest a wide range of dry foodstuffs of vegetable origin, such as cereal, bread, pasta, rice, couscous, flour, spices, dried fruits, and nuts. More unusual recorded foods include crushed red pepper, chocolate and cocoa beans, coffee substitute, cookies, dried mangelwurzel, and even the toxic seeds of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium). They have also been known to infest commercial pet food, such as cracked corn used for bird feed. They often leave webbing in the food they infest.[3][28]

Control
Hidden inside a single cotton T-shirt, pantry moths can pupate to adult form.

After larvae or moths have been found, it is important to throw out all food sources not in very tightly sealed containers. Moth larvae can chew through plastic bags and thin cardboard, so even unopened packages may become infested.[2] They are also notoriously difficult to get rid of, and can crawl on ceilings and spin cocoons in rooms other than the kitchen or pantry where they hatched. Last instar larvae are able to travel significant distances before they pupate. When seeking the source of an infestation, the search thus cannot be limited to the immediate area where pupae are discovered.[3] Pantry moths can use areas inside clothing (remaining hidden) to reproduce and pupate, so it is important to inspect any source of clothing material.

None of the stages of the organism (eggs, larvae, adults) are very temperature tolerant and all can be killed by a week of freezing or by brief heating in a microwave or conventional oven when such treatment is practical.[9] Scrubbing infested areas with a mixture of soap and water or vinegar is also effective.[29]

Nontoxic traps are also available to monitor outbreaks. One type of trap is a triangular box with a pheromone lure and sticky walls inside. These traps are generally known as pheromone traps. In this case, male moths are attracted inside by the female pheromone (the lure) and then get stuck against the sticky walls inside the box.[30]

Moths often do not even need a lure, as common glue traps sometimes work well to reduce the number of adults. However, the efficiency of such traps is highly doubtful as they only capture males, and usually only a fraction of them, while adult females, eggs and larvae are unaffected, enabling a possible reinfestation. Moths can be deterred from an area by using nontoxic pantry moth spray. It is most effective to treat the infestation by eliminating the source and any affected food items, interrupting their mating processes, and repelling them from the areas where dried food and grains are kept. Thus it is recommended to first eliminate the source of infestation followed by larvae, eggs, and eventually moths.[31]

The caterpillars are parasitized by Habrobracon hebetor, a braconid wasp which is a potential biological control agent.[32]

Additionally, blue to violet light can be very effective in drawing moths, which suggests that the deployment of violet light could become yet another pest control tactic for Indian-meal moths.[13]

gollark: Hmm, what things are there which are very widely used, mostly ignored, and require maintenance... I could look at some arch package update logs.
gollark: I thought that had lots of contributors.
gollark: It's probably something incredibly boring and yet important.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/746820118788440166Purchase "peace" on amazon.
gollark: Sure, why not.

References
  1. "Indian Meal Moth (Department of Entomology)". Department of Entomology (Penn State University). Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  2. "National Pesticide Information Centre". Retrieved 1 September 2016.
  3. Fasulo, Thomas R. & Knox, Marie A. (2009): University of Florida Featured Creatures – Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella Hübner. Version of December 2009.
  4. Mohandass, S; Arthur, F; Zhu, K; Throne, J (2007). "Biology and management of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in stored products". Journal of Stored Products Research. 43 (3): 302–311. doi:10.1016/j.jspr.2006.08.002. ISSN 0022-474X.
  5. Fasulo, Thomas; Knox, Marie (November 2015). "indianmeal moth". Featured Creatures. university of Florida. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
  6. Horak, M. (1994). "A Review of Cadra Walker in Australia: Five New Native Species and the Two Introduced Pest Species (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae)". Australian Journal of Entomology. 33 (3): 245–262. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.1994.tb01226.x.
  7. References in Savela, Markku (2009): Markku Savela's Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms – Plodia. Version of 9 April 2010. Retrieved 10 April 2010.
  8. Fitch, Asa (1856) First and Second Report on the Noxious, Beneficial and other Insects of the State of New York. C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, USA.
  9. Lyon, William F. (2006): Ohio State University Insect and Pest Fact Sheets – HYG-2089-97: Indianmeal Moth. Version of 31 August 2006.
  10. Williams, Gwyneth (June 1964). "The life-history of the Indian meal-moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lep. Phycitidae) in a warehouse in Britain and on different foods". Annals of Applied Biology. 53 (3): 459–475. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1964.tb07259.x.
  11. Boots, Michael (1 May 1998). "Cannibalism and the stage-dependent transmission of a viral pathogen of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella". Ecological Entomology. 23 (2): 118–122. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00115.x. ISSN 1365-2311.
  12. Boots, M. "Kinship and cannibalism in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella: No evidence of kin discrimination". Evolutionary Ecology Research. 2: 119–128.
  13. Cowan, Thomas; Gries, Gerhard (1 May 2009). "Ultraviolet and violet light: attractive orientation cues for the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 131 (2): 148–158. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00838.x. ISSN 1570-7458.
  14. Frederick), Chapman, R. F. (Reginald (1998). The insects : structure and function (4th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521570480. OCLC 37682660.
  15. Tzanakakis, M. E. (1 November 1959). "An ecological study of the Indian-meal moth Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) with emphasis on diapause". Hilgardia. 29 (5): 205–246. doi:10.3733/hilg.v29n05p205. ISSN 0073-2230.
  16. "Biological Control of Stored-Product Pests" Midwest Biological Control News (University of Wisconsin)
  17. Sait, Begon (July 1994). "The Effects of a Sublethal Baculovirus Infection in the Indian Meal Moth, Plodia interpunctella". Journal of Animal Ecology. 63 (3): 541–550. doi:10.2307/5220. JSTOR 5220.
  18. du Rand, Nicolette (July 2009). Isolation of Entomopathogenic Gram Positive Spore Forming Bacteria Effective Against Coleoptera (PhD thesis). Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal. hdl:10413/1235.
  19. Boots, M.; Begon, M. (1993). "Trade-Offs with Resistance to a Granulosis Virus in the Indian Meal Moth, Examined by a Laboratory Evolution Experiment". Functional Ecology. 7 (5): 528–534. doi:10.2307/2390128. JSTOR 2390128.
  20. Cook, Penny A.; Gage, Matthew J. G. (1995). "Effects of Risks of Sperm Competition on the Numbers of Eupyrene and Apyrene Sperm Ejaculated by the Moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 36 (4): 261–268. doi:10.1007/s002650050148. JSTOR 4601073.
  21. Podoler, H. (1974). "Effects of Intraspecific Competition in the Indian Meal-Moth (Plodia interpunctella Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) on Populations of the Moth and its Parasite Nemeritis canescens (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)". Journal of Animal Ecology. 43 (3): 641–651. doi:10.2307/3528. JSTOR 3528.
  22. Zhu, Junwei; Rikard Unelius, C.; Ryne, Camilla; Valeur, Peter G.; Löfstedt, Christer (August 1999). "Reidentification of the female sex pheromone of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella: evidence for a four-component pheromone blend". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 92 (2): 137–146. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00533.x.
  23. Grant, G. G.; Brady, U. E. (1 June 1975). "Courtship behavior of phycitid moths. I. Comparison of Plodia interpunctella and Cadra cautella and role of male scent glands". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 53 (6): 813–826. doi:10.1139/z75-095. ISSN 0008-4301.
  24. Ryne, Camilla; Zhu, Jun-Wei; Van Dongen, Stefan; Christer, Löfstedt (2001). "Spermatophore Size and Multiple Mating: Effects on Reproductive Success and Post-Mating Behaviour in the Indian Meal Moth". Behaviour. 138 (8): 947–963. doi:10.1163/156853901753286506.
  25. Cardé, Ring T.; Willis, Mark A. (1 July 2008). "Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 34 (7): 854–866. doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5. ISSN 0098-0331. PMID 18581182.
  26. Deseő, K.V. (1 January 1976). The Oviposition of the Indian Meal Moth (Plodia Interpunctella Hbn., Lep., Phyticidae) Influenced by Olfactory Stimuli and Antennectomy. The Host-Plant in Relation to Insect Behaviour and Reproduction. pp. 61–65. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4274-8_8. ISBN 978-1-4613-4276-2.
  27. Grant, G. G.; Smithwick, E. B.; Brady, U. E. (1 June 1975). "Courtship behavior of phycitid moths. II. Behavioral and pheromonal isolation of Plodia interpunctella and Cadra cautella in the laboratory". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 53 (6): 827–832. doi:10.1139/z75-096. ISSN 0008-4301.
  28. Grabe, Albert (1942): Eigenartige Geschmacksrichtungen bei Kleinschmetterlingsraupen ["Strange tastes among micromoth caterpillars"]. Zeitschrift des Wiener Entomologen-Vereins 27: 105–109 [in German]. PDF fulltext
  29. "How to Get Rid of Pantry Moths". Learn to Get Rid Of... 19 February 2015. Archived from the original on 27 March 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2015.
  30. Klass, Carolyn (2009) Pesticide Management Education Program – Indian Meal Moth. Version of February 2009.
  31. Cranshaw, Whitney (2011): Indian Meal Moth. Colorado State University Extension. Version 4/03. Reviewed 3/08.
  32. Phillips, Tom (1995) Biological Control of Stored-Product Pests Archived 15 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine. Midwest Biological Control News Online 2(10).
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.