Pleasant Stay hotel case

The Pleasant Stay hotel case was a sensational case against Jayalalithaa, the late Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, a state in South India during her tenure in 1991-96. Jayalalitha and her ministerial colleague, T. M. Selvaganapathy, were charged of misusing office to allow Pleasant Stay Hotel in Kodaikanal to build seven floors against the norms. The case and chargesheet were filed during the following DMK (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam) government headed by Karunanidhi in 1996. Jayalalitha and T. M. Selvaganapathy were convicted in the lower court, which sentenced her to one year imprisonment to the two and three others involved. The case had political implications as the aftermath violence created furore in the state. The statewide violence resulted in the burning of five buses, damaging fifty buses and leaving 40 people injured. Three girls students of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University were burnt alive in a bus in Dharmapuri .[1] The three AIADMK party workers were convicted in the case, received a death sentence in the case in 2007, but it was commuted to life imprisonment.[2]

Pleasant Stay hotel case
Date10 June 1999 (1999-06-10)
LocationChennai
ParticipantsJ.Jayalalithaa, T. M. Selvaganapathy
ChargesMisuse of office, Corruption, Criminal conspiracy
VerdictSupreme Court: Acquitted of all charges, High Court: Acquitted of all charges Trial Court: One year imprisonment for all six
ConvictionsHigh Court: none; Trial Court: 5
Litigation7 years

The Madras High Court acquitted her and other four accused in the case of all the charges on 4 December 2001 along with the TANSI land acquisition case. The Supreme Court upheld the order of Madras High Court on 24 November 2003 on grounds of lack of evidence. She came back to power winning the 2002 Tamil Nadu assembly by-election from Andipatti constituency in March 2002.

Background

Jayalalithaa Jayaram (born 24 February 1948), commonly referred to as Jayalalithaa, is an Indian politician and three time Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu during various times from 1991–96, 2002–06 and 2011–14, 2015-2016.

During April 1991, Mittal was permitted to construct two floors of his hotel named Pleasant Stay in Kodaikanal. In January 1992, he submitted a revised plan seeking permission to build seven floors altogether. His petition was rejected by Kodaikanal township and he filed an appeal. Not waiting for the appeal, he started constructing four floors of the hotel. Palani Hills Conservation Council (PHCC) obtained a stay from Madras High Court during December 1997. There was a legal tangle between the hotel and PHCC, which PHCC won. On 13 May 1994, the Jayalalithaa government passed a Government Order, G.O. Ms. No.126, which permitted Mittal to build five extra floors in a total of seven floors against the norms. Jayalalitha, Local Administration Minister Selvaganapathy, Municipal Administration and Water Supply secretary H.M. Pandey, executive director of the hotel Rakesh Mittal, and Chairman and managing director of the hotel Palai N. Shanmugham were the five accused in the case. It was quoted that P.C. Cyriac, who was the Secretary of Municipal Administration and Water supply did not authorise the construction was transferred and was replaced by Pandey. It was also inferred that the GO was passed by Jayalalitha, Selavaganapathy and Pandey, against the Architectural and Aesthetics Aspects Committee (AAAC) headed by the Chief secretary of the Government of Tamil Nadu. On 6 December 1994, the government passed another order G.O., Ms. No.317 with effect from 13 May 1994, preventing buildings from provisions of the Development Control Rules. on 31 March 1994, Mittal was ordered by Madras High Court not to use any floor other than the zero and first floors. He went on higher appeal, which was quashed along with the G.O. of 13 May 1994.[3]

Trial

The trial was held in a trial court in Chennai and was presided over by a special judge named Radhakrishnan. The prosecution team was headed by N. Natarajan, Senior Special Public Prosecutor for corruption cases against Jayalalitha, conducted by Special Public Prosecutors S. Ramasamy and K.E. Venkataraman, Special Public Prosecutor R. Karunakaran and advocate Sunder Mohan. The judge noted that the First Investigation Report (FIR) was filed only two years after the incident on account of the higher officials and politicians involved. He also noted that there was pecuniary advantage to the hotel management, though it was not proved that the passing of G.O. in favour of the hotel management has no reciprocal benefit for the government officials involved. It quoted that Pandey, who knew the details about the case, did not follow the Secretarial functions of passing the file directly to Jayalalitha via Selavaganapathy. On 2 February 2000, the five were convicted and Jayalalithaa was sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment and levied a fine of ₹2,000 on charges of criminal conspiracy and criminal misconduct by a public servant. The judge in his order stated, "We have sufficient circumstantial evidence which proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Jayalalithaa, Selvaganapathy and Pandey committed criminal misconduct abetted by Rakesh and Palani, and all were party to the criminal conspiracy. Hence I am inclined to impose the minimum sentence contemplated under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act".[3] On 9 February 2000, the Madras High Court suspended the implementation of the sentence on appeal from Jayalalitha.

Aftermath

The supporters of Jayalalithaa were angered by the verdict, which led to statewide protests and violence, including damage to public property by AIADMK members.[4] Two AIADMK cadres committed suicide by setting themselves ablaze. The violence resulted in burning five buses, damaging fifty buses and leaving 40 people injured. Major violence took place in the state capital Chennai where 22 buses of the state run MTC buses were damaged, leaving 27 people with injuries. The state bus transport was suspended for 24 hours and the police arrested 400 people across the state, with 317 from Chennai alone.[5]

The major violence was that of 2000 Dharmapuri bus burning, where three girls were killed. On 2 February 2000, seventy students from the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, were returning from a study tour in two buses. They were stopped by mob, who forced the students to alight. One of the men threw a petrol bomb, setting fire to a bus before all of the students got out. Three girls, Hemalatha from Chennai, V. Gayathri from Virudhachalam and Kokilavani from Namakkal were burned to death, and 16 others sustained injuries.[6] The scenes of the bus burning were captured and broadcast the following day on Sun TV.[7] The incident caused anger amongst the student community. Schools and colleges were asked to shut for a week, and students across the state held silent processions and protest marches condemning the act.[8] The three AIADMK men who were charged in the act, went on to be sentenced by the High Court to death on 5 December 2007, confirming the lower court order. There were 25 other cadre of AIADMK who were convicted on lesser charges and sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment.[9]

The verdict came at a time when the Tamil Maanila Congress, which was in alliance with DMK during the 1996 parliamentary elections, was supporting the AIADMK in the upcoming by-elections. DMK was alleging that it was the handiwork of AIADMK cadre, while AIADMK demanded a CBI (Central Buruea of Investigation) probe in the issue questioning the presence of DMK supported Sun TV crew during the time of burning.[5]

Timeline
  • April 1991 - Mittal was allowed to construct two floors of Pleasant Stay Hotel in Kodaikanal.
  • 13 May 1994 Jayalalithaa government passed a Government Order, G.O. Ms. No.126, which permitted Mittal to build five extra floors in a total of seven floors against the norms.
  • 6 December 1994 - The government passed another order G.O., Ms. No.317 with effect from 13 May 1994, preventing buildings from provisions of the Development Control Rules.
  • 31 March 1994 - Mittal was ordered by Madras High Court not to use any floor other than the zero and first floors. He went on higher appeal, which was quashed along with the G.O. of 13 May 1994.
  • 18 January 1997 - Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) files chargesheet against the five accused
  • 2 February 2000 - Jayalalitha and the other four accused, Local Administration Minister Selvaganapathy, Municipal Administration and Water Supply secretary H.M. Pandey, executive director of the hotel Rakesh Mittal, and Chairman and managing director of the hotel Palai N. Shanmugham, were sentenced to one year imprisonment.
  • Wide spread violence in the state, three college students were burnt alive in a bus.
  • May 2001 - AIADMK led by Jayalalithaa sweeps polls (earlier Jayalilathaa disqualified from contesting)
  • 14 May 2001 - Jayalalithaa assumes office amid controversy. Governor Fathima Beevi administers oath of confidence.[10]
  • 1 July 2001 - Fathima Beevi, the then governor of Tamil Nadu resigns after being asked to step down by the union ministry.
  • 21 September 2001 - Supreme Court disqualifies Jayalalithaa
  • 4 December 2001 - Madras High Court acquits Jayalalithaa of all her charges in the two cases.[11]
  • March 2002 - Jayalalithaa becomes the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.
  • 24 November 2003 - Supreme Court of India upholds the verdict of High Court along with TANSI land acquisition case.[12]
  • 15 February 2007 - Trial court sentences three AIADMK cadre to death involved in bus burning incident and 25 others get seven years rigorous imprisonment.[13]
  • 5 December 2007 - High court confirms death to the three AIADMK cadre involved in bus burning incident killing three girls.

Notes
  1. "HOTEL CASE VERDICT: AIADMK volunteers go berserk". The Hindu. 3 February 2000. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
  2. "Dharmapuri bus burning: SC commutes death sentence to life imprisonment". Business Standard. 11 March 2016. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
  3. "The conviction of Jayalalitha". 17 (4). Frontline. 3 March 2000. Retrieved 1 January 2014. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. "HOTEL CASE VERDICT: AIADMK volunteers go berserk". The Hindu. 3 February 2000. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  5. Arun, Kalyan (11 February 2000). "Jayalalitha convicted, supporters go on rampage". India Abroad. Archived from the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 1 November 2015 – via HighBeam Research.
  6. "3 burnt alive". The Hindu. 3 February 2000. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 8 August 2009.
  7. "Sun TV news editor deposes in bus-burning trial". The Hindu. 22 June 2005. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  8. "Schools and colleges ordered shut in Tamil Nadu". Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  9. "High court upholds death penalty to 3 AIADMK men". News Wire. New Delhi: Hindustan Times. 6 December 2007. Archived from the original on 17 November 2018. Retrieved 1 November 2015 – via HighBeam Research.
  10. "Jayalalitha sworn in as Tamil Nadu CM despite indictment in 3 cases". India Today. 28 May 2001. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  11. Singh, Onkar (24 November 2003). "SC acquits Jaya in Tansi land deal case". Rediff. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
  12. "Jayalalitha files nomination papers from Andipatti constituency". Newswire. New Delhi: Hindustan Times. 15 April 2006. Archived from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2015 – via HighBeam Research.
  13. "Three AIADMK workers get death for students' murder". News Wire. Salem, Tamil Nadu: Hindustan Times. 16 February 2007. Archived from the original on 17 April 2016. Retrieved 1 November 2015 – via HighBeam Research.
gollark: ++delete <@715487485643194378>
gollark: ```c#define BOOL int#define FALSE 0#define TRUE 1#define FILE_NOT_FOUND 2```
gollark: loAD™
gollark: * if you ok generate it now thanks
gollark: ... it doesn't even keep your number if you roll?

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.