Plant identification

Plant identification is the process of matching a specimen plant to a known taxon. It uses various methods, most commonly single-access keys or multi-access keys.

History
See also: History of botany and History of plant systematics
George Bentham English systematician and botanist

Plant identification has evolved over hundreds of years and depends to a large extent on what criteria and whose system is used. Plant identification implies comparisons of certain characteristics and then assigning a particular plant to a known taxonomic group, ultimately arriving at a species or infraspecific name.

In the history of botany many large systems, useful at the time, were widely used for decades until superseded as taxonomic knowledge progressed.

  • Genera Plantarum[1] was devised by George Bentham (1800–1884) and Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817–1911) who were British botanists working for Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in the latter part of the nineteenth century. They described the system in a three-volume work. A total of 202 groups were described, which they called "orders" - now known as families. The system was renowned for being very practical and the keys were quite accurate.

The study by of plant taxonomy with computer programmes was beginning by the early 1970s,[2] and botanical keys now use numerical computer systems.

Taxonomy
Main article: Plant taxonomy

This is the branch of botany which deals with plant identification, nomenclature and classification. The term, first coined by French botanist A. P. de Candolle (1813). Carl Linnaeus used the term 'Systematics' which now includes identification, nomenclature and evolutionary relationships.

Herbarium
Main article: Herbarium

Reference collections of plant specimens are collected into herbarium and identified. Most plant parts are dried, pressed, mounted on herbarium sheets and stored; succulents and some other types of plants are normally kept in alcohol solution. The sheets are standard size of 16​1⁄2 × 11​1⁄2 inches or 41.25 × 28.75 cm. The identified plant ideally includes all parts including roots, flowers and fruits, strobili, etc. One of the largest herbaria in the world is kept at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew England and has collected an estimated 7 Million specimens.[3]

gollark: You can annoy the predictor and make them need more CPU time by basing your prediction on facts like "what is the least significant bit of the latest block on the bitcoin blockchain" and "what is the value of [SOME STOCK MARKET PARAMETER]", depending on how early they fill the boxoids.
gollark: Regardless of what choice you make, the contents of the boxes are fixed, thus pick mildly more money. This probably sounds unsmart to you, which is either because you (and the server generally) are/is right, or because you fell into one side and now think it's obvious.
gollark: As I said, in general apparently both sides are split pretty evenly, have fairly convincing arguments each way, and both think that their answer is obvious and the other is wrong.
gollark: Perhaps we are HIGHLY smart unlike random internet people and OBVIOUSLY picked the correct® answer, or perhaps we just hold similar philosophical/intellectual/whatever views which make us more inclined to one-box.
gollark: I mean, maybe the average internet rabble is just bad at understanding what "perfect prediction" means, but you could probably argue that it's "rational" at the time of choosing to take both, even if it's... acausally...? worse for you. Nobody here appears to have.

See also

References
  1. Isely, Duane. 1994 One hundred and one botanists Iowa State University Press.
  2. Larry E. Morse (1974), "Computer-Assisted Storage and Retrieval of the Data of Taxonomy and Systematics", Taxon, 23 (1): 29–43, doi:10.2307/1218086, JSTOR 1218086
  3. "entry for RBG Kew", Index Herbariorum, retrieved 21 April 2015

Further reading
  • Tim Jones' (2013) - "A visual identification key utilizing both gestalt and analytic approaches to identification of Carices present in North America (Plantae, Cyperaceae)" in the Biodiversity Data Journal
  • John Shaffner's key (1911) in the Ohio Naturalist
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.