Piotroski F-score

Piotroski F-score is a number between 0 and 9 which is used to assess strength of company's financial position. The score is used by financial investors in order to find the best value stocks (nine being the best). The score is named after Stanford accounting professor Joseph Piotroski.

Calculation procedure

The score is calculated based on 9 criteria divided into 3 groups.[1]

Profitability
  1. Return on Assets (1 point if it is positive in the current year, 0 otherwise);
  2. Operating Cash Flow (1 point if it is positive in the current year, 0 otherwise);
  3. Change in Return of Assets (ROA) (1 point if ROA is higher in the current year compared to the previous one, 0 otherwise);
  4. Accruals (1 point if Operating Cash Flow/Total Assets is higher than ROA in the current year, 0 otherwise);
    Leverage, Liquidity and Source of Funds
  5. Change in Leverage (long-term) ratio (1 point if the ratio is lower this year compared to the previous one, 0 otherwise);
  6. Change in Current ratio (1 point if it is higher in the current year compared to the previous one, 0 otherwise);
  7. Change in the number of shares (1 point if no new shares were issued during the last year);
    Operating Efficiency
  8. Change in Gross Margin (1 point if it is higher in the current year compared to the previous one, 0 otherwise);
  9. Change in Asset Turnover ratio (1 point if it is higher in the current year compared to the previous one, 0 otherwise);

Some adjustments that were done in calculation of the required financial ratios are discussed in the original paper.[1]

The score is calculated based on the data from financial statement of a company. A company gets 1 point for each met criteria. Summing up of all achieved points gives Piotroski F-score (number between 0 and 9).

Interpretation

A company that has Piotroski F-score of 8–9 is considered to be strong. Alternatively, firms achieving the F-score of 0–2 are considered to be weak.

Average value of Piotroski F-score can be different in different branches of economy (e.g. manufacturing, finance, etc.). This should be taken into consideration when comparing companies with different specializations.

Other notes
  • Some improvements to the Piotroski F-score were suggested in Alpha Architect[2] and American Association of Individual Investors (AAII)[3] official blogs.
gollark: Maybe your password is to become the nontrivial zeroes of the Riemann zeta function then.
gollark: This is acceptable apart from the rounded corners.
gollark: Well, it should be "record" and "play" buttons which are unrounded and flat in color, and then a rectangle to type search queries into.
gollark: 1. rounded corners are actually the enemy of mankind, so you're committing heresy2. see how it lacks a "maximize" button in the topright, and also uses nonnative buttons for some reason?3. perhaps4. heresy²5. too bad, it should not have menus if it can fit stuff directly
gollark: Offer your soul to their obviously superior development team?

See also

References
  1. Piotroski, Joseph D. (January 2002). "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (PDF). The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
  2. "Value Investing Research: Simple Methods to Improve the Piotroski F-Score". Alpha Architect. 2015-05-05. Retrieved 2017-01-19.
  3. Investors, American Association of Individual. "AAII: The American Association of Individual Investors". www.aaii.com. Retrieved 2017-01-19.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.