Physautotype

The physautotype (from French, physautotype) was a photographic process, invented by Joseph Nicéphore Niépce and Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre[2] in 1832, in which images were produced by the use of lavender oil residue dissolved in alcohol as the photographic agent.[3][4] The solution was coated onto a silver or glass plate and allowed to dry, after which it had a powdery white appearance. The plate was then exposed in a camera obscura for about 8 hours and developed with petroleum-based spirit vapors,[3] which caused the least strongly exposed areas to become proportionally more transparent, creating a photographic image that was positive when viewed against a darker background.

19th century printed reproduction of a still life believed to be a circa 1832 Niépce physautotype (glass original accidentally destroyed circa 1900)[1]

Brief history

On his way to England, Niépce met in Paris with Louis Daguerre, who had a reputation as camera obscura specialist. Hoping to shorten the exposure time of his bitumen process, Niépce decided in 1829, to associate Daguerre to his research. This association did not bring any noticeable progress to the bitumen process, however, the two partners discovered new photographic processes using as photosensitive agents tree resins and the residue of lavender oil distillation. With those, the exposure time went down to about 8 hours in the sun.

Chemical principle

The resin is melted and a little portion of it is dissolved on alcohol. Then a silver plate, a glass plate or a mirror is coated with the solution and allowed to dry on a tray. Once it's completely dry, the alcohol evaporation leaves a residue of tiny dispersed resin particles that give the plate a white, blurry appearance.

When exposed to the sun, the exposed areas seem to polymerize[5] becoming insoluble, while the unexposed areas are still soluble. The plate is developed over a tray with petroleum-derived spirits like kerosene and turpentine, which washes away the unexposed areas. The process lasts 5 to 10 minutes and the solvent must never touch the plate. If left over the vapors for longer, the plate continues developing itself, with the final product of a clear plate with nothing on it.[6]

Process

The photosensitive agent of this process fine-tuned by Niépce and Daguerre in 1832 was the residue of lavender oil distillation.

  1. Niépce and Daguerre obtained this residue evaporating lavender oil by heating it until they got a dry product. After evaporation, only a dark brown tar desiccated by heat is left, becoming hard and brittle. Nowadays the lavender oil and the evaporation process is usually replaced with the use of Violin Rosin that's melted without any further treatment.
  2. Niépce and Daguerre would then dissolve a small amount of this tar in alcohol, then pour the solution on a well polished silver plate. Modern photographers interested in the process found out that the solution has to be about 1%. Any dirt or grease on the plate will show on the final image.
  3. After the alcohol evaporation, a uniform white deposit remained on the plate. The thus prepared plate was exposed to light in the camera obscura for about 7 to 8 hours.
  4. After exposure, the plate was put upside down above a tray holding oil of white petroleum (something like kerosene or turpentine). The fumes of this kerosene were sufficient to develop the image without any further treatment.

The process gives directly positive images, since the white deposit remains on the plate, at places that were touched by light, while the kerosene fumes render transparent the zones that were not illuminated. However, with the effect of reflections on the metal appearing at places where the white deposit has become transparent, images can be seen as positive or negative.

gollark: I meant there are tons of confounding things with trying to infer the effect of policies from real countries.
gollark: Orbital bombardment.
gollark: * now
gollark: No, I mean you can't just by looking at existing countries noe.
gollark: Plus you can't try out radical ideas.

References
  1. Jean-Louis Marignier. "Identification of the image called "La Table Servie" as a physautotype made by Niepce in 1832 - 1833". Université Paris-Sud. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
  2. "Daguerre and the Invention of Photography (Physautotype)". Photo-museum.org.
  3. "Art & Architecture Thesaurus, s.v. "physautotypes"". Getty.edu. Retrieved 10 December 2007.
  4. Roger Watson, Helen Rappaport (2013). Capturing the Light: A Story of Genius, Rivalry and the Birth of Photography. Pan Macmillan. ISBN 9780230771512.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  5. Turban, Lionel (2011-11-10). "Disactis - Photographie par les Procédés Anciens: Physautotype ou l'avant Daguerreotype". Disactis - Photographie par les Procédés Anciens. Retrieved 2019-02-14.
  6. AlternativePhotography (2012-06-14). "The physautotype process". AlternativePhotography.com. Retrieved 2019-02-14.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.