Peters v Collinge

Peters v Collinge [1993] 2 NZLR 554 is a case regarding illegal contracts at common law, involving the unenforceability of contracts interfering with the democratic process.

Peters v Collinge
CourtHigh Court of New Zealand
Full case nameWinston Peters v John Collinge
Decided1993
Citation(s)[1993] 2 NZLR 554
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingFisher J
Keywords
illegal contracts

Background

Winston Peters was a maverick National Party MP in 1992, and the Party was going through the process of expelling him. Peters was MP for Tauranga, comfortably held the seat, and it was anticipated that he would retain it no matter which party he stood for. In the run up to the 1993 general election, in order to retain Tauranga, the party required Peters to sign a form agreeing to not stand in any electorate for any political party other than the National Party. This was somewhat problematic for Peters, as he would soon start the new political party New Zealand First.[1]

Peters subsequently filed in court an interim injunction to have this declared invalid. John Collinge was named as the defendant, as he was the president of the National Party.

Held

The High Court ruled that this term interfered with the democratic process, making it illegal under common law, thus was legally unenforceable.

gollark: I've heard that their support and warranty is not actually very good unless you pay even more.
gollark: Yes, that would be even more of a waste of money.
gollark: It's probably *possible*, with work, to run other general-purpose software on a DS. It's much easier with fairly standard x86 machines.
gollark: Very fast calculators with better I/O, yes.
gollark: What?

References
  1. Walker, Campbell (2004). Butterworths Student Companion Contract (4th ed.). LexisNexis. p. 160. ISBN 0-408-71770-X.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.