Peter Schönemann

Peter Hans Schönemann (July 15, 1929 – April 7, 2010) was a German born psychometrician and statistical expert. He was professor emeritus in the Department of Psychological Sciences at Purdue University. His research interests included multivariate statistics, multidimensional scaling and measurement, quantitative behavior genetics, test theory and mathematical tools for social scientists. He published around 90 papers dealing mainly with the subjects of psychometrics and mathematical scaling. Schönemann’s influences included Louis Guttman, Lee Cronbach, Oscar Kempthorne and Henry Kaiser.

Peter Schönemann
Born
Peter Hans Schönemann

(1929-07-15)July 15, 1929
Perthau, Weimar Republic
DiedApril 7, 2010(2010-04-07) (aged 80)
NationalityGerman
American
EducationUniversity of Munich
University of Göttingen
University of Illinois
Known forCriticism of IQ testing
Scientific career
FieldsPsychometrics
Statistics
InstitutionsPurdue University
ThesisA Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem With Applications to Orthogonal and Oblique Rotation (1964)
Doctoral advisorsK.W. Dickman
Ledyard Tucker
Other academic advisorsRaymond Cattell

Schönemann was a persistent critic of what he considered to be scientifically sanctioned racism in psychology. In particular, he claimed that (1) Arthur Jensen and others routinely confuse the first principal component (PC1) with g as Charles Spearman defined it, and that (2) the high IQ heritability estimates reported in the literature derive from restrictive formal models whose underlying assumptions are rarely tested and usually violated by the data.[1][2][3]

Schönemann died on April 7, 2010.[4]

Education
  • 1953–56 University of Munich (Vordiplom)
  • 1956–59 University of Göttingen (Diplom)
  • 1960–64 University of Illinois (Ph.D. in General Psychology)

Notable work

Schönemann's PhD thesis "A solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem with applications to orthogonal and oblique rotation," proposed a solution to the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Other Schönemann papers include "A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem",[5] "The minimum average correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors",[6] and "Some new results on factor indeterminacy"[7] co-authored with M.M. Wang. Schönemann wrote also numerous book chapters, including the "Psychometrics of Intelligence" chapter in Encyclopedia of Social Measurement and the “Heritability” chapter in Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence.[8]

g theory

Spearman's hypothesis asserts a correlation between the g-loadedness of IQ tests and measures of their hereditability, a concept put to work in Arthur Jensen's discussion of black--white race differences from the 1980s. Schönemann regarded this work as resting on a conceptual confusion.

Schönemann argued for the non-existence of psychometric g. He wrote that there is a fundamental difference between g, first defined by Charles Spearman as a latent one-dimensional variable that accounts for all correlations among any intelligence tests, and a first principal component (PC1) of a positive correlation matrix. Spearman's tetrad difference equation states a necessary condition for such a g to exist.[9] The important proviso for Spearman's claim that such a g qualifies as an "objective definition" of "intelligence", is that all correlation matrices of "intelligence tests" must satisfy this necessary condition, not just one or two, because they are all samples of a universe of tests subject to the same g. Schönemann argued that this condition is routinely violated by all correlation matrices of reasonable size, and thus, such a g does not exist.[10]

Twin studies

In a number of publications, Schönemann argued that the statistical heritability estimates used in most twin studies rest on restrictive assumptions which are usually not tested, and if they are, often are found to be violated by the data.[11] He argued that this was true for the monozygotic twins raised apart vs. together (MZT) studies (Burt, Shields, Jinks and Fulker, Bouchard) as well as for the more widely used MZT vs dizygotic twins raised together studies.[12] For example, the narrow heritabilities of responses to the question "did you have your back rubbed" work out to 0.92 heritable for males and 0.21 heritable for females. Using the statistical models published in Loehlin and Nichols (1976) the question "Did you wear sunglasses after dark?" is 130% heritable for males and 103% for females.[1][13]

gollark: That would be neat, although probably hard to cool and power sensibly since desktop CPUs are very hot.
gollark: At least mine actually has replaceable memory/storage, and adequate cooling.
gollark: Possibly. It might be a mindset thing, inasmuch as I prefer having somewhat upgradeable/repairable hardware and more open/flexible software stacks because I have tons of time to tweak stuff.
gollark: Also, you can get it on sane non-Apple laptops without the hassle.
gollark: No, Linux is probably better in terms of resource efficiency and being able to connect to things.

References
  1. Models and muddles of heritability. Genetica, 99, 97–108 Archived 2008-02-28 at the Wayback Machine
  2. Factorial definitions of intelligence: Dubious legacy of dogma in data analysis. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and why. Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press, 325–374
  3. Schönemann, P. H. (1983). Do IQ tests really measure intelligence? Commentary, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 311–313
  4. Peter Schönemann Obituary
  5. A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1–10.: "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-07. Retrieved 2007-08-18.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. The minimum average correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors. Psychometrika, 36, 21–30.: "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-07. Retrieved 2007-08-18.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  7. Some new results on factor indeterminacy. Psychometrika, 37, 61–69 Archived 2006-09-07 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Peter H. Schönemann (1994). Heritability. In R Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York: McMillan, p. 528–536.
  9. Famous artefacts: Spearman's Hypothesis. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive / Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 665–698:"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-07. Retrieved 2007-08-18.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. Psychometrics of Intelligence. K. Kemp-Leonard (ed.) Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 3, 193–201: "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-07. Retrieved 2011-03-17.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  11. Schönemann, P. H. & Schönemann, R. D. (1994). Environmental versus genetic models for Osborne's personality data on identical and fraternal twins. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive – Current Psychology of Cognition 13, 141–167: "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-02-28. Retrieved 2007-08-20.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  12. Schönemann, P. H.(1994).Heritability. In R Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence. New York: McMillan, p. 528–536.
  13. Totems of the IQ Myth: General Ability (g) and its Heritabilities (h2, HR). 1995 Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.