Pete Brungardt

Peter F. "Pete" Brungardt (born January 30, 1947) is a former Republican member of the Kansas Senate, representing the 24th district from 2001 to 2013. His previous political experiences include the Salina City Planning Commission (1986–1991), Salina City Commission (1991–1999), and Mayor of Salina (1993–1994, 1998–1999).

Pete Brungardt
Member of the Kansas Senate
from the 24th district
In office
2001–2013
Succeeded byTom Arpke
Personal details
Born (1947-01-30) January 30, 1947
Salina, Kansas
Political partyRepublican
Spouse(s)Rosie Brungardt
ResidenceSalina, Kansas
Alma materPennsylvania College of Optometry
Professionoptometrist

An optometrist,[1] he is married to Rosie Brungardt.

Committee assignments

Brungardt served on these legislative committees:[2]

  • Federal and State Affairs (chair)
  • Joint Committee on State-Tribal Relations (chair)
  • Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight (vice-chair)
  • Ethics and Elections
  • Calendar and Rules
  • Public Health and Welfare

Major donors

Some of the top contributors to Brungardt's 2008 campaign, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics:

Kansas Republican Senatorial Committee, Kansas Bankers Association, Senate Republican Leadership Committee of Kansas, Kansas National Education Association, Kansas Contractors Association, Kansas Association of Realtors

Financial, insurance and real estate companies were his largest donor group.

Elections

2012

Brungardt was defeated by Tom Arpke in the August 7, 2012 Republican primary, by a margin of 5,413 to 4,354. Arpke went on to defeat Democratic nominee Janice Norlin in the general election on November 6, 2012.[3][4][5]

gollark: You don't know that. We can't really test this. Even people who support utilitarian philosophy abstractly might not want to pull the lever in a real visceral trolley problem.
gollark: Almost certainly mostly environment, yes.
gollark: It's easy to say that if you are just vaguely considering that, running it through the relatively unhurried processes of philosophizing™, that sort of thing. But probably less so if it's actually being turned over to emotion and such, because broadly speaking people reaaaallly don't want to die.
gollark: Am I better at resisting peer pressure than other people: well, I'd *like* to think so, but so would probably everyone else ever.
gollark: Anyway, I have, I think, reasonably strong "no genocide" ethics. But I don't know if, in a situation where everyone seemed implicitly/explicitly okay with helping with genocides, and where I feared that I would be punished if I either didn't help in some way or didn't appear supportive of helping, I would actually stick to this, since I don't think I've ever been in an environment with those sorts of pressures.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.