Performance Rights Act

On February 4, 2009, Congressman John Conyers, Jr. introduced H.R. 848, the Performance Rights Act in the U.S. House of Representatives, 111th Congress. The Bill was referred to the House Judiciary Committee and on December 14, 2010, it was placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405. Under this Bill's version, performance rights was broadly designed to protect the civil rights of minority, religious, rural, and small communities with components to public access and education.

Performance Rights Act
Long titleA bill to provide fair compensation to artists for use of their sound recordings.
Acronyms (colloquial)Performance Rights Act
Legislative history

Musician George Clinton has spearheaded the H.R. 848 initiative through his foundation, Mothership Connection Education Foundation, with public awareness educational campaigns on copyright recapturing and reclaiming royalties for children of civil rights era musical performers.

The Performance Rights Act is an amendment to United States copyright law proposed by Senator Patrick Leahy. The bill would expand the protection for public performances of copyrighted sound recordings.[1]

Under the Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act, sound recordings have a limited public performance right in digital transmissions, such as webcasting.[2] This bill would expand the performance right to cover terrestrial broadcasts, such as AM/FM radio. The bill is both strongly contested and supported.[1] Artists who support the bill argue that it properly compensates performing artists.[3] Broadcasters who oppose the bill argue that the performance right is unnecessary and overly burdensome.[4]

Previous Bills

In 2007, Howard Berman proposed legislation (H.R.4789) entitled the Performing Rights Act. That bill included a provision to establish a flat fee for non-profit radio stations, or stations that make less than $1.25 million in gross revenue. Still, broadcasters opposed this bill because of the potential increase in transaction costs for operating a radio station.[5]

gollark: ++choose 1000 gollark ¬gollark
gollark: It uses algorithms and coding, see.
gollark: See? It has highly intelligent intelligence.
gollark: ++choose 1000 gollarkbad lyricbad
gollark: Ah, they have equal weight.

References
  1. Sanner, Ann (2010-03-02). "Warwick Wants Performers Paid for Radio Play". ABC News. Retrieved 2010-03-11.
  2. Peters, Marybeth (1995-06-28). "Statement of Marybeth Peters The Register of Copyrights before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property Committee on the Judiciary". Retrieved 2010-03-11.
  3. Christman, Ed (2010-02-02). "Artist Push Performance Rights Act During Grammy Week". Billboard. Retrieved 2010-03-11.
  4. Bush, Debbie (2010-02-11). "Taking A Stand: Protecting local radio stations". 14WFIE. Retrieved 2010-03-11.
  5. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-03-05. Retrieved 2010-02-24.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) 5 Reasons Why the Performance Rights Act is a Bad Idea


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.