Penelope Mountjoy
Penelope Anne Mountjoy FSA is an archaeologist specialising in ceramics.
Penelope Mountjoy FSA | |
---|---|
Academic background | |
Alma mater | University of Bristol |
Academic work | |
Discipline | Archaeology |
Sub-discipline | |
Institutions | British School at Athens |
Career
Mountjoy undertook a BA in Classics at the University of Bristol and a MPhil from the University of London before returning to Bristol for her PhD.[1] She is a member of the British School at Athens.[2][1]
Mountjoy was a recipient of a Seymour Gitin Distinguished Professor Fellowship from the Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in 2014 to study Mycenaean decorated pottery in Cyprus and the South Levant.[3]
She was elected as a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London on 5 May 1988.[4]
Select publications
- 1983. (with Kunze, Emil) Orchomenos V: Mycenaean pottery from Orchomenos, Eutresis and other Boeotian sites (Abhandlungen 89).
- 1985. The Archaeology of cult: the sanctuary at Phylakopi (British School of Archaeology at Athens 18). London, British school of archaeology at Athens.
- 1999. Regional Mycenaean decorated pottery. Berlin, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut,
- 2008. The Mycenaean and the Minoan Pottery: the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Collections. Weisbaden.
gollark: Immediately undergo exponentiation modulo 7, then.
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- scienceâ„¢ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
References
- "Penelope-Anne Mountjoy". CYAthens. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
- "Penelope A. Mountjoy. The British School at Athens 2010 Grant Recipient". Harvard University. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
- "Fellows and their Projects Class of 2014-2015". Albright Institute of Archaeological Research. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
- "Fellow's Directory: Dr Penelope Mountjoy". Society of Antiquaries of London. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.