Pelly (Saskatchewan electoral district)
Pelly is a former provincial electoral district for the Legislative Assembly of the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Located in east-central Saskatchewan, it was centered on the village of Pelly. The riding was created before the 2nd Saskatchewan general election in 1908, and dissolved before the 23rd Saskatchewan general election in 1995. This constituency elected the first woman to the Saskatchewan legislature: Sarah Ramsland.
It is now part of the district of Canora-Pelly.
Members of the Legislative Assembly
| # | MLA | Served | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | John Kenneth Johnston | 1908 – 1917 | Liberal | |
| 2. | Magnus O. Ramsland | 1917 – 19181 | Liberal | |
| 3. | Sarah Katherine Ramsland | 1919 – 1925 | Liberal | |
| 4. | Charles Tran | 1925 – 1929 | Progressive | |
| 5. | Reginald J.M. Parker | 1929 – 1944 | Liberal | |
| 6. | Dan Daniels | 1944 – 1948 | CCF | |
| 7. | John Banks | 1948 – 1952 | Liberal | |
| 8. | Arnold Feusi | 1952 – 1956 | CCF | |
| 9. | Jim Barrie | 1956 – 1964 | Liberal | |
| 10. | Leonard Larson | 1964 – 1967 | CCF | |
| 11. | Jim Barrie | 1967 – 1971 | Liberal | |
| 12. | Leonard Larson | 1971 – 1977 | New Democrat | |
| 13. | Norm Lusney | June 1977 – 1986 | New Democrat | |
| 14. | Rod Gardner | 1986 – 1991 | Progressive Conservative | |
| 15. | Ron Harper | 1991 – 1995 | New Democrat |
Notes
1 Magnus Ramsland died as a result of the worldwide influenza pandemic of 1918. In the 1919 Pelly by-election, he was succeeded by his widow Sarah Ramsland, the first woman ever elected to the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan.
Election results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | John Kenneth Johnston | 363 | 52.31% | – | |
| Provincial Rights | Richard Serle Dundas | 331 | 47.69% | – | |
| Total | 694 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | John Kenneth Johnston | 685 | 50.18% | -2.13 | |
| Conservative | E.J. Johnson | 680 | 49.82% | +2.13 | |
| Total | 1,365 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Magnus O. Ramsland | 2,402 | 63.39% | +13.21 | |
| Conservative | Reginald J.M. Parker | 1,387 | 36.61% | -13.21 | |
| Total | 3,789 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Sarah Katherine Ramsland | 1,703 | 54.29% | -9.10 | |
| Independent | Walter William Whelan | 1,434 | 45.71% | – | |
| Total | 3,137 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Sarah Katherine Ramsland | 1,457 | 33.64% | -20.65 | |
| Nonpartisan League | George Faulds Stirling | 1,038 | 23.97% | – | |
| Independent | Harry W. Slipchenko | 925 | 21.36% | – | |
| Independent Conservative | Charles Tran | 911 | 21.03% | – | |
| Total | 4,331 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive | Charles Tran | 1,946 | 53.58% | +29.61 | |
| Liberal | Sarah Katherine Ramsland | 1,686 | 46.42% | +12.78 | |
| Total | 3,632 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Reginald J.M. Parker | 3,086 | 71.43% | +25.01 | |
| Independent | John Kenneth Johnston | 1,234 | 28.57% | - | |
| Total | 4,320 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Reginald J.M. Parker | 4,835 | 57.78% | -13.65 | |
| Farmer-Labour | Andrew Danyleyko | 1,639 | 19.59% | – | |
| Conservative | Frederick G. Garvin | 1,426 | 17.04% | - | |
| United Front | Walter Ernest Wiggins | 468 | 5.59% | – | |
| Total | 8,368 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Reginald J.M. Parker | 3,936 | 56.04% | -1.74 | |
| CCF | Gertrude S. Telford | 3,088 | 43.96% | +24.37 | |
| Total | 7,024 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCF | Dan Daniels | 3,273 | 51.37% | +7.41 | |
| Liberal | Reginald J.M. Parker | 2,544 | 39.93% | -16.11 | |
| Labor–Progressive | William M. Berezowski | 554 | 8.70% | - | |
| Total | 6,371 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | John Banks | 2,646 | 35.55% | -4.38 | |
| CCF | Dan Daniels | 2,476 | 33.27% | -18.10 | |
| Labor–Progressive | William M. Berezowski | 1,301 | 17.48% | +8.78 | |
| Social Credit | John W. Kowalyshen | 1,020 | 13.70% | – | |
| Total | 7,443 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCF | Arnold Feusi | 3,286 | 49.90% | +16.63 | |
| Liberal | John Banks | 2,727 | 41.41% | +5.86 | |
| Labor–Progressive | William M. Berezowski | 572 | 8.69% | -8.79 | |
| Total | 6,585 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Jim Barrie | 3,568 | 49.52% | +8.11 | |
| CCF | Arnold Feusi | 3,069 | 42.60% | -7.30 | |
| Social Credit | William A. Horocholyn | 568 | 7.88% | - | |
| Total | 7,205 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Jim Barrie | 3,455 | 49.59% | +0.07 | |
| CCF | Peter J. Wlasichuk | 2,921 | 41.93% | -0.67 | |
| Social Credit | George Johnson | 304 | 4.36% | -3.52 | |
| Prog. Conservative | Gordon C. Peters | 287 | 4.12% | - | |
| Total | 6,967 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCF | Leonard Larson | 2,705 | 41.07% | -0.86 | |
| Liberal | Jim Barrie | 2,669 | 40.53% | -9.06 | |
| Prog. Conservative | Bohdan E. Lozinsky | 1,212 | 18.40% | +14.28 | |
| Total | 6,586 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Jim Barrie | 3,002 | 52.16% | +11.63 | |
| NDP | Leonard Larson | 2,753 | 47.84% | +6.77 | |
| Total | 5,755 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | Leonard Larson | 2,905 | 56.08% | +8.24 | |
| Liberal | Jim Barrie | 2,275 | 43.92% | -8.24 | |
| Total | 5,180 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | Leonard Larson | 3,511 | 50.26% | -5.82 | |
| Liberal | Peter E. McDonald | 2,250 | 32.21% | -11.71 | |
| Progressive Conservative | W.J. Ferniuk | 1,150 | 16.46% | - | |
| Independent | George G. Shlakoff | 75 | 1.07% | - | |
| Total | 6,986 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | Norm Lusney | 3,724 | 48.29% | -1.97 | |
| Progressive Conservative | Barrie Johnson | 2,314 | 30.00% | +13.54 | |
| Liberal | Donn Walsh | 1,674 | 21.71% | -10.50 | |
| Total | 7,712 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | Norm Lusney | 3,739 | 56.40% | +8.11 | |
| Progressive Conservative | Donald F. Boyd | 2,130 | 32.13% | +2.13 | |
| Liberal | Rudolph Els | 760 | 11.47% | -10.24 | |
| Total | 6,629 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | Norm Lusney | 3,381 | 48.05% | -8.35 | |
| Progressive Conservative | Mervyn C. Abrahamson | 3,179 | 45.18% | +13.05 | |
| Liberal | Tom Campbell | 476 | 6.77% | -4.70 | |
| Total | 7,036 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Conservative | Rod Gardner | 3,280 | 49.47% | +4.29 | |
| NDP | Norm Lusney | 3,113 | 46.95% | -1.10 | |
| Liberal | A. Ben Ferrie | 237 | 3.58% | -3.19 | |
| Total | 6,630 | 100.00% | |||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDP | Ron Harper | 3,992 | 59.59% | +12.64 | |
| Progressive Conservative | Bernard Rink | 2,055 | 30.68% | -18.79 | |
| Liberal | Louis Sliwa | 652 | 9.73% | +6.15 | |
| Total | 6,699 | 100.00% | |||
gollark: Anyway, this is... somewhat orthogonal to the main point here: that advertising is almost certainly affecting you a bit.
gollark: So if you buy a phone which got 4.5 stars or something, then you see another cheaper one with equally good reviews, you'll send the old one back...?
gollark: How will you actually know if the Voxel was going to work the same as the oPhone, though?
gollark: Let's imagine you're buying a phone or something. Imagine there are two types of phone: the Orange oPhone XIIX+MAX and the Goggle Voxel 4. They might work exactly the same for you, unrealistically, but the Orange oPhone is more expensive. You were influenced a bit because of advertising, and because of that bought an oPhone over a Voxel.
gollark: Or a mildly worse but better-advertised one, because stuff rarely works exactly the same.
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.