Pangeran Pekik

Pangeran Pekik (or Prince Pekik, died in 1659) was a Javanese prince, and son of the last Duke of Surabaya, Jayalengkara.[2][3] After the Mataram conquest of Surabaya he was forced to live in Mataram court.[1] He was executed in 1659 under the orders of Mataram's King Amangkurat I, who suspected him of conspiracy.[1]

Pangeran

Pekik
Died1659
Mataram Sultanate
Cause of deathAssassinated by Amangkurat I[1]
Parent(s)
  • Jayalengkara, Duke of Surabaya (father)
RelativesAmangkurat I (son-in-law), Amangkurat II (grandson)
FamilyHouse of Surabaya

Family and ancestry

Pangeran Pekik was born into the ruling house of the Duchy of Surabaya. His father, Jayalengkara (r. ?–1625), was the Duke of Surabaya at the time of Surabaya's conquest by Mataram (1625).[3] The House of Surabaya claimed to be descendants of Sunan Ampel (1401–1481), one of the nine saints (wali songo) credited with the spread of Islam in Java.[4][2][5] However, de Graaf wrote that there was no evidence for this claim although he considered it likely that the ruling family were distantly related to Sunan Ampel.[2][5]

Biography

Fall of Surabaya
Main article: Mataram conquest of Surabaya

At the time of Mataram's campaign of conquest against Surabaya (1619–1625), Pekik's father the duke was already blind and aged.[3] Pekik was one of the leader of the defending forces and mobilised Surabaya's allies against Mataram.[6] After several years of war, Surabaya surrendered in 1625.[7] Pangeran Pekik was exiled to an ascetic life at the grave of Sunan Ngampel-Denta near Surabaya.[8][7][9]

Move to Mataram court

In 1633, Mataram's Sultan Agung recalled Pangeran Pekik from Ampel.[9] Pekik married Agung's sister and henceforth lived at court, while Agung's son and heir (later Amangkurat I) married Pekik's daughter.[9] While at court, he "did much to civilize the Court" of Mataram, according to Dutch historian H. J. de Graaf.[3] He brought culture from the court of Surabaya, which had been a centre of culture and Islamic Old Javanese literature since the second half of the 16th century, to the relatively new court of Mataram.[2] Agung's decision to institute the Javanese calendar was probably the result of Pekik's influence.[9]

Campaign against Giri

In 1636, Pekik was ordered by Sultan Agung to lead a Mataram army in a reconquest of Giri.[9][10] Giri was a religious site, ruled by religious men who traced their lineage to Sunan Giri, one of the nine wali (saints) credited with spreading Islam in Java, and became a centre of opposition against Mataram.[10] Agung hesitated to attack it, and he might have been worried that his men would not be willing to fight the holy men of Giri.[11] Pekik's standing and his family's relation to the line of Sunan Ampel, a more senior wali than Sunan Giri, provided legitimacy to this campaign and help ensure the soldiers' loyalty.[12] The fortified town of Giri was taken by Mataram troops under Pekik in 1636.[13]

Amangkurat I's reign and assassination

Sultan Agung died in 1646 and was succeeded by Amangkurat I, who was married to one of Pekik's daughters.[14] Around 1649, she died soon after giving birth to her third child, who was designated the crown prince (he later became King Amangkurat II).[1] In 1659 Amangkurat I suspected that Pangeran Pekik was leading a conspiracy against his life.[1] Subsequently, Pekik and his relatives, including those living in Surabaya, were killed under Amangkurat I's order.[1]

The massacre of Pekik's family, East Java's most important princely house, created a rift between Amangkurat and his East Javanese subjects. It also caused a conflict with his son, the crown prince, who was close to Pekik (his maternal grandfather) and the rest of his mother's family.[1][15]

gollark: Social networks without E2E don't say "yes, we're not very secure, but [list of features that that allows us to provide we couldn't otherwise]".
gollark: That never happens.
gollark: I only really do software, hardware is expensive and slower to iterate on.
gollark: I mean, sure, it wouldn't exist without users abstractly speaking, but some users are just bad and wrong.
gollark: Except the mobile phone system, which seems to be a horrible convoluted insecure mess.

References

Citations
  1. Pigeaud 1976, p. 66.
  2. Pigeaud 1976, p. 16.
  3. Pigeaud 1976, p. 40.
  4. Akhmad Saiful Ali 1994, p. 34.
  5. Pigeaud 1976, p. 36.
  6. Akhmad Saiful Ali 1994, p. 48.
  7. Akhmad Saiful Ali 1994, p. 65.
  8. Ricklefs 2008, p. 48.
  9. Reid 2010.
  10. Ricklefs 2008, p. 51.
  11. Ricklefs 2008, p. 52.
  12. Ricklefs 2008, pp. 51–52.
  13. Pigeaud 1976, p. 46.
  14. Pigeaud 1976, p. 54.
  15. Ricklefs 2008, p. 89.

Bibliography
  • Akhmad Saiful Ali (1994). Ekspansi Mataram terhadap Surabaya Abad ke-17 (Thesis) (in Indonesian). Surabaya: Islamic Institute of Sunan Ampel.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Ricklefs, M.C. (2008-09-11). A History of Modern Indonesia Since C.1200. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-05201-8.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Pigeaud, Theodore Gauthier Thomas (1976). Islamic States in Java 1500–1700: Eight Dutch Books and Articles by Dr H. J. de Graaf. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. ISBN 90-247-1876-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Reid, Anthony (2010). "Islam in South-East Asia and the Indian Ocean littoral, 1500–1800: expansion, polarisation, synthesis". In Morgan, David O.; Reid, Anthony (eds.). The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 3: The Eastern Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85031-5.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.