Package-merge algorithm

The package-merge algorithm is an O(nL)-time algorithm for finding an optimal length-limited Huffman code for a given distribution on a given alphabet of size n, where no code word is longer than L. It is a greedy algorithm, and a generalization of Huffman's original algorithm. Package-merge works by reducing the code construction problem to the binary coin collector's problem.[1]

The coin collector's problem

Suppose a coin collector has a number of coins of various denominations, each of which has a numismatic value unrelated to its denomination. The coin collector has run out of money and needs to use some of his coin collection to buy something of cost N. He wishes to select a subset of coins from his collection of minimum numismatic value whose denominations total N.

The binary version of this problem is that all denominations are powers of 2, that is, 1, 1/2, 1/4, etc. dollars.

Description of the package-merge algorithm

Assume that the largest denomination is 1 dollar, and that N is an integer. (The algorithm works even if these assumptions do not hold, by trivial modifications.) The coin collector first separates his coins into lists, one for each denomination, sorted by numismatic value. He then packages the smallest denomination coins in pairs, starting from the pair of smallest total numismatic value. If there is one coin left over, it will be the coin of highest numismatic value of that denomination, and it is set aside and ignored henceforth. These packages are then merged into the list of coins of the next smallest denomination, again in order of numismatic value. The items in that list are then packaged in pairs, and merged into the next smallest list, and so forth.

Finally, there is a list of items, each of which is a 1 dollar coin or a package consisting of two or more smaller coins whose denominations total 1 dollar. They are also sorted in order of numismatic value. The coin collector then selects the least value N of them.

Note that the time of the algorithm is linear in the number of coins.

Reduction of length-limited Huffman coding to the coin collector's problem

Let L be the maximum length any code word is permitted to have. Let p1, …, pn be the frequencies of the symbols of the alphabet to be encoded. We first sort the symbols so that pi ≤ pi+1. Create L coins for each symbol, of denominations 2−1, …, 2−L, each of numismatic value pi. Use the package-merge algorithm to select the set of coins of minimum numismatic value whose denominations total n − 1. Let hi be the number of coins of numismatic value pi selected. The optimal length-limited Huffman code will encode symbol i with a bit string of length hi. The canonical Huffman code can easily be constructed by a simple bottom-up greedy method, given that the hi are known, and this can be the basis for fast data compression.[2]

Performance improvements and generalizations

With this reduction, the algorithm is O(nL)-time and O(nL)-space. However, the original paper, "A fast algorithm for optimal length-limited Huffman codes", shows how this can be improved to O(nL)-time and O(n)-space. The idea is to run the algorithm a first time, only keeping enough data to be able to determine two equivalent subproblems that sum to half the size of the original problem. This is done recursively, resulting in an algorithm that takes about twice as long but requires only linear space.[1]

Many other improvements have been made to the package-merge algorithm to reduce the multiplicative constant and to make it faster in special cases, such as those problems having repeated pis.[3] The package-merge approach has also been adapted to related problems such as alphabetic coding.[4]

Methods involving graph theory have been shown to have better asymptotic space complexity than the package-merge algorithm, but these have not seen as much practical application.

gollark: I don't believe in objective evil and I subscribe to the view that asking whether something is "evil" or not is not very useful because it's a very fuzzy word/category.
gollark: /are doing
gollark: Oh, or let's say you have some kind of anxiety disorder and constantly worry that you did badness.
gollark: No, I mean that you might worry about the ethicality of everyday actions or something.
gollark: I think this would be likely to cause you to do stuff you consider possibly-bad more than someone who does *not* think about it much and just relies on ethical instincts gained from whatever.

References
  1. Larmore, Lawrence L.; Hirschberg, Daniel S. (1990). "A fast algorithm for optimal length-limited Huffman codes". Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 37 (3): 464–473. doi:10.1145/79147.79150.
  2. Moffat, Alistair; Turpin, Andrew (Oct 1997). "On the implementation of minimum redundancy prefix codes". IEEE Transactions on Communications. 45 (10): 1200–1207. doi:10.1109/26.634683.
  3. Witten, Ian H.; Moffat, Alistair; Bell, Timothy Clinton (1999). Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and indexing documents and images (2 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. ISBN 978-1-55860-570-1. 1558605703.
  4. Larmore, Lawrence L.; Przytycka, Teresa M. (1994). "A Fast Algorithm for Optimal Height-Limited Alphabetic Binary-Trees". SIAM Journal on Computing. 23 (6): 1283–1312. doi:10.1137/s0097539792231167.
  • Baer, Michael B. (2006). "Twenty (or so) Questions: D-ary Length-Bounded Prefix Coding". arXiv:cs.IT/0602085.
  • Moffat, Alistair; Turpin, Andrew; Katajainen, Jyrki (March 1995). Space-Efficient Construction of Optimal Prefix Codes. IEEE Data Compression Conference. Snowbird, Utah, USA. doi:10.1109/DCC.1995.515509.
  • An implementation of the package-merge algorithm ""
  • A fast entropy coder that uses package-merge algorithm
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.