PICO process

The PICO process (or framework) is a mnemonic used in evidence based practice (and specifically Evidence Based Medicine) to frame and answer a clinical or health care related question.[1] The PICO framework is also used to develop literature search strategies, for instance in systematic reviews.[2] The PICO acronym stands for[3][4]

  • P  Patient, Problem or Population
  • I  Intervention
  • C  Comparison, control or comparator[5]
  • O  Outcome(s) (e.g. pain, fatigue, nausea, infections, death)

Alternatives such as SPICE and PECO (among many others) can also be used. Some authors suggest adding T and S, as follows:

Examples

Clinical question: "In children with headache, is paracetamol more effective than placebo against pain?"

  • Population = Children with headaches; keywords = children + headache
  • Intervention = Paracetamol; keyword = paracetamol
  • Compared with = Placebo; keyword = placebo
  • Outcome of interest = Pain; keyword = pain

Pubmed (health research database) search strategy: children headache paracetamol placebo pain

gollark: Irrelevant. Haskell is lazy.
gollark: You mean JavaScript?
gollark: C as C preprocessor when?! I mean, this would be terrible as C makes string ops apioforms and would make ASTs bad but still.
gollark: Learning them would take time and the benefit isn't substantial.
gollark: I never learned any precedence rules so all is bracketed.

References

  1. Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D (2006). "Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions" (PDF). AMIA Annu Symp Proc: 359–63. PMC 1839740. PMID 17238363.
  2. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P (2007). "Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions". BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 7: 16. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16. PMC 1904193. PMID 17573961.
  3. "Asking a Good Question (PICO)". 17 November 2004. Retrieved 2010-05-18.
  4. Richardson, WS (1995). "The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence based-decisions". APC Journal Club. 123, 3: A12–A13.
  5. "Chapter 2. Systematic Review Methods -- AHRQ Technical Reviews and Summaries -- NCBI Bookshelf". Retrieved 2010-05-18.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.