Orthonama

Orthonama is a genus of the geometer moth family (Geometridae). It belongs to the tribe Xanthorhoini of the "carpet" subfamily (Larentiinae). Nycterosea is usually included here by modern authors, but may in fact be distinct enough to warrant recognition as an independent genus.[1] The genus was erected by Jacob Hübner in 1825.

Orthonama
Adult oblique carpet (O. vittata)
at Commanster in the Belgian Ardennes
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Subfamily:
Tribe:
Genus:
Orthonama

Hübner, 1825
Type species
Geometra lignata
Hübner, 1799
Species

Several, see text

Synonyms

Numerous, see text

Selected species

Species of Orthonama (sensu lato) include:[2]

  • Orthonama centrostrigaria (Wollaston, 1858) (= O. interruptata, O. latirupta, O. luscinata, O. mediata, O. paranensis)
  • Orthonama dicymanta Prout, 1929
  • Orthonama discataria
  • Orthonama evansi (McDunnough, 1920)
  • Orthonama flavillacea
  • Orthonama obstipata (Fabricius, 1794) gem
  • Orthonama plemyrata
  • Orthonama quadrisecta Herbulot, 1954
  • Orthonama vittata (Borkhausen, 1794) oblique carpet

Synonyms

Junior synonyms of Orthonama are:[3]

  • Nycterocea (lapsus)
  • Nycterosea Hulst, 1896 (but see above)
  • Nyctosia (lapsus; non Hampson, 1900: preoccupied)
  • Orthonoma (lapsus)
  • Percnoptilota Hulst, 1896
  • Plemyria Hübner, 1825a (non Hübner, 1825b: preoccupied)

Footnotes

  1. Pitkin & Jenkins (2004ab), FE (2009ab), and see references in Savela (2001)
  2. FE (2009ab), and see references in Savela (2001)
  3. Pitkin & Jenkins (2004ab), and see references in Savela (2001)
gollark: ...
gollark: It's somewhat important to incentivize people to make things which aren't conveniently sellable physical objects.
gollark: Plants should really have solar-powered microcontrollers with cellular/satellite links so they can receive emails.
gollark: I mean, natural ones yes, artificially designed ones I'm fine with. Although any sufficiently short one is probably going to turn up in some organism somewhere through sheer chance, even if it's not doing the same thing.
gollark: I think intellectual property definitely needs reduction. Copyright lasts waaaaay too long, patent weirdness basically stopped 3D printer development for ages, and trademarking-or-whatever "sky" is ridiculous. Also, you can patent some software stuff you probably shouldn't be able to.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.